1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language, Context and Text
  4. Volume 6, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The Bayeux Tapestry, which strictly speaking is not a tapestry at all but a piece of embroidery, was produced in the late 11th century, probably commissioned by Odo, bishop of Bayeux, William the Conqueror’s half-brother. Its objective is to support William’s invasion and conquest of England. It can thus be seen as a piece of 11th century propaganda. It tells the story of Harold’s oath to support William’s claims to the English crown, his subsequent acceptance of the crown himself, followed by William’s invasion of England and Harold’s death at the Battle of Hastings in 1066. The images in the Tapestry are accompanied by a text in Latin. This paper analyses the transitivity of those clauses in this text where Harold and William occur. This shows how both of these protagonists are represented through the transitivity selections of the text. While both occur as Actor to the same extent, Harold functions as Affected much more frequently than William (including ultimately, getting killed!). In addition, William functions as Sayer more frequently than Harold, and usually with verbs that indicate his authority. Thus William is painted as an effective, authoritative ruler. Thus the text of the tapestry underlines the power of William following his conquest and enhances the empowerment which success in battle bestowed on him.

© 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00079.ban
2024-12-03
2025-01-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/langct.00079.ban
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Asp, Elissa & Jessica de Villiers
    2019 Clinical linguistics. InGeoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 587–619. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316337936.025
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.025 [Google Scholar]
  2. Banks, David
    1992 Men, Women and Transitivity in To the Lighthouse and A Farewell to Arms. InYvon Tosser & Patrick Galliou (eds.), Mirroirs de la Femme dans la Littérature d’Expression Anglaise, Mélanges Offerts à Colette Caraës, 23–36. Brest: Groupe de Recherche sur le Roman et la Nouvelle de Langue Anglaise, Université de Bretagne Occidentale.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 2008 The development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 2016 On the (non)necessity of the hybrid category behavioural process. InDonna R. Miller & Paul Bayley (eds.), Hybridity in systemic functional linguistics: Grammar, text and discursive context, 21–40. Sheffield: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 2017 The birth of the academic article. Le Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions 1665–1700, Sheffield, Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 2019 A systemic functional grammar of English: A simple introduction. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429467844
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467844 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2021 “Un projet de justice et de progrès social”: President Macron’s 2020 new year message to the nation. A linguistic viewpoint. Text & Talk42(3). 303–325. 10.1515/text‑2020‑0050
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-0050 [Google Scholar]
  8. Benson, James D., William S. Greaves & Glen Stillar
    1995 Transitivity and ergativity in “The Lotus-Easters”. Language and Literature4(1). 31–48. 10.1177/096394709500400102
     https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709500400102 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Lily
    2005 Transitivity in media texts: Negative verbal process sub-functions and narrator bias. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching43(1). 33–52. 10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.33
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.33 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cummings, Michael
    2010 An introduction to the grammar of Old English. A systemic functional approach. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1973 Explorations in the functions of language, London: Edward Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 2002[1971] Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. InM. A. K. Halliday, Linguistic studies of text and discourse, volume 2 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 88–125. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin
    1993 Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1989 Linguistics, language and verbal art (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 2007 Private pleasure, public discourse: Reflections on engaging with literature. InDonna R. Miller & Monica Turci (eds.), Language and verbal art revisited: Linguistic approaches to the study of literature, 13–40. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Ji, Yinglin & Dan Shen
    2004 Transitivity and mental transformation: Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook. Language and Literature13(4). 335–348. 10.1177/0963947004046284
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947004046284 [Google Scholar]
  18. Karimi, Neda, Alison Moore & Annabelle Lukin
    2018 Cancer care as an integrated practice: Consultations between an oncologist and patients with advanced, incurable cancer. InAkila Sellami-Baklouti & Lise Fontaine (eds.), Perspectives from systemic functional linguistics, 315–337. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315299877‑16
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315299877-16 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lemagnen, Sylvette
    2015 La Tapisserie de Bayeux. Une découverte pas à pas. Bayeux: OREP Editions.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Lepelley, René
    1964 Contribution à l’étude des inscriptions de la Tapisserie de Bayeux. Annales de Normandie14(3). 313–321. 10.3406/annor.1964.6523
     https://doi.org/10.3406/annor.1964.6523 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lewin, Beverly A., Jonathan Fine & Lynne Young
    2001 Expository discourse. A genre-based approach to social science research texts. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Lewis, Michael John
    2007 Identity and status in the Bayeux Tapestry: The iconographic and artefactual evidence. Anglo-Norman Studies291. 100–120.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Martínez, Iliana A.
    2001 Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure. English for Specific Purposes20(3). 227–247. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00013‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller, Donna R.
    2019 Language and literature. InGeoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 690–714. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316337936.028
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.028 [Google Scholar]
  25. Noxon, Gerald
    1968 The Bayeux Tapestry. Cinema Journal71. 29–35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1224876
     [Google Scholar]
  26. O’Halloran, Kay L.
    2005 Mathematical discourse, language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Pagano, Adriana & Annabelle Lukin
    2015 Exploring language in verbal art: A case study in K. Mansfield’s ‘Bliss’. InSonia Starc, Carys Jones & Arianna Maiorani (eds.), Meaning making in text: Multimodal and multilingual functional perspectives, 92–108. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137477309_6
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137477309_6 [Google Scholar]
  28. Riss, Anne-Marie
    2015 Une apparition intempestive dans la Broderie de Bayeux Essai d’élucidation, L’apparition dans les œuvres d’art, Caen, France. hal-02904505.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle
    The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (trans. G. N. Garmonsway) 1954 (2nd edition). London: Dent.
  30. Thompson, Victoria
    1999 Kingship-in-death in the Bayeux Tapestry. Reading Medieval Studies251. 107–121. https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/85265/
     [Google Scholar]
  31. van Kempen, Ad F. J.
    2009 The Mercian connection, Harold Godwineson’s ambitions, diplomacy and channel-crossing, 1056–1066, History94(313). 2–19. 10.1111/j.1468‑229X.2009.00439.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-229X.2009.00439.x [Google Scholar]
  32. van Kempen, Ad J. F.
    2016 ‘A mission he bore — to Duke William he came’: Harold Godwineson’s Commentum and his covert ambitions. Historical Research89(246). 1–22. 10.1111/1468‑2281.12147
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2281.12147 [Google Scholar]
  33. Xiang, Qiujian
    2022 Transitivity analysis of Joe Biden’s Inaugural Address from the perspective of systemic functional grammar. Theory and Practice in Language Studies12(1). 165–169. 10.17507/tpls.1201.20
     https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1201.20 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00079.ban
Loading
The text of the Bayeux Tapestry
Language, Context and Text 6, 446 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00079.ban
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00079.ban
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00079.ban
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bayeux Tapestry; propaganda; systemic functional linguistics; transitivity

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error