1887
Volume 7 Number 2
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Active-passive voice alternation is central to scientific writing, addressed both in journal style guidelines — often simplistically — and in academic writing instruction, which highlights its rhetorical complexity. Despite existing linguistic descriptions of the passive’s discourse functions, more applied research is needed on how novice writers use it in developing academic writing. This study examines how medical students employ the passive in research article introductions, using systemic functional linguistics theory to analyse variation according to process type, Agent role and rhetorical move. Results show that in Introduction sections, passives are mostly Agent-less relational processes with categorising or literature-review functions and that ergativity — rather than transitivity — better explains passive use in scientific English. They also show how writers align with discourse conventions while simultaneously displaying individual stylistic variation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00086.fre
2026-04-03
2026-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Banks, David
    2017 The extent to which the passive voice is used in the scientific journal article, 1985–2015. Functional Linguistics4(12). 10.1186/s40554‑017‑0045‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-017-0045-5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baratta, Alexander M.
    2009 Revealing stance through passive voice. Journal of Pragmatics411. 1406–1421. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartlett, Tom
    2025 Transitivity. 50th International Systemic Functional Linguistics Congress, Pre-conference Institute, 6 July 2025, University of Glasgow.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Christiansen, Stacy L. & American Medical Association
    2020AMA manual of style: A guide for authors and editors / JAMA network editors, 11th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ding, Daniel D.
    2002 The passive voice and social values in science. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication32(2). 138–154. 10.2190/EFMR‑BJF3‑CE41‑84KK
    https://doi.org/10.2190/EFMR-BJF3-CE41-84KK [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferreira, Fernanda
    2020 In defense of the passive voice. American Psychologist76(1). 145–153. 10.1037/amp0000620
    https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000620 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gardner, Sheena
    2012 Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes11(1). 52–63. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gardner, Sheena, Hilary Nesi & Douglas Biber
    2019 Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics40(4). 646–674. 10.1093/applin/amy005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1978Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2008 Working with meaning: Towards an appliable linguistics. InJonathan Webster (ed.), Meaning in context: Implementing intelligent applications of language studies, 7–23. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  12. Herrando-Rodrigo, Isabel
    2022 ‘Is voice inevitable in written texts?’ Animate agents followed by active verbs as writers’ (de)voicing mechanisms in knowledge dissemination practices. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación901. 81–94. 10.5209/clac.81309
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.81309 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hyland, Ken
    2008 Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. English Text Construction1(1). 5–22. 10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl [Google Scholar]
  14. Hyland, Ken & Carmen Sancho Guinda
    (eds.) 2012Stance and voice in written academic genres. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137030825
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
    2023 Exploring authorial voice across academic genres: A multidimensional perspective. Written Communication40(1). 210–237. 10.1177/07410883221128876
    https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221128876 [Google Scholar]
  16. Konopasky, Abigail W. & Kimberly M. Sheridan
    2016 Towards a diagnostic toolkit for the language of agency. Mind, Culture, and Activity23(2). 108–123. 10.1080/10749039.2015.1128952
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1128952 [Google Scholar]
  17. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    2012 Systemic functional linguistics as appliable linguistics: Social accountability and critical approaches. DELTA28 (Especial). 435–471. 10.1590/S0102‑44502012000300002
    https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502012000300002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & M. A. K. Halliday
    2009[1997]Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Winfred Wenhui Xuan
    2024 System networks as a resource in L2 writing education. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL)63(1). 95–120. 10.1515/iral‑2024‑0064
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2024-0064 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mhilli, Olga
    2023 Authorial voice in writing: A literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open81. 100550. 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100550
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100550 [Google Scholar]
  21. Millar, Neil, Brian Budgell & Keith Fuller
    2013 ‘Use the active voice whenever possible’: The impact of style guidelines in medical journals. Applied Linguistics34(4). 393–414. 10.1093/applin/ams059
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams059 [Google Scholar]
  22. Minton, Timothy D.
    2015 In defense of the passive voice in medical writing. The Keio Journal of Medicine64(1). 1–10. 10.2302/kjm.2014‑0009‑RE
    https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.2014-0009-RE [Google Scholar]
  23. Parkinson, Jean
    2024 The use of the passive voice in science students’ writing. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4935317 or 10.2139/ssrn.4935317
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4935317 [Google Scholar]
  24. Parkinson, Jean & Lisa Woods
    2025 The use of the passive voice in science students’ writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes771. 101561. 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101561
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101561 [Google Scholar]
  25. Rodríguez-Vergara, Daniel
    2017 A systemic functional approach to the passive voice in English into Spanish translation: Thematic development in a medical research article. Open Linguistics31. 1–17. 10.1515/opli‑2017‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sarasso, Elisabetta, Federica Agosta, Noemi Piramide, Andrea Gardoni, Elisa Canu, Michela Leocadi, Veronica Castelnovo, Silvia Basaia, Andrea Tettamanti, Maria Antonietta Volontè & Massimo Filippi
    2021 Action observation and motor imagery improve dual task in Parkinson’s disease: A clinical/fMRI study. Movement Disorders36(11). 2569–2582. 10.1002/mds.28717
    https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28717 [Google Scholar]
  27. Swales, John
    1990Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2004Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
  29. Swales, John M. & Christine B. Feak
    2012Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.2173936
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173936 [Google Scholar]
  30. Tarone, Elaine, Sharon Dwyer, Susan Gillette & Vincent Icke
    1998 On the use of the passive and active voice in astrophysics journal papers: With extensions to other languages and other fields. English for Specific Purposes17(1). 113–132. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(97)00032‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00032-X [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, Yiming
    2025 ‘X can be classified into …’: A local grammar of classification in academic discourse and its implications for EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes731. 101466. 10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101466
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101466 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00086.fre
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00086.fre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agency; medical academic writing; SFL; voice
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error