1887
Volume 7 Number 2
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the code of conduct and ethics of the second most prestigious public university in Mexico, the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP). These regulations are meant to officially represent the ethical stance of the entire university with more than 95,000 members. The study aims to identify prevalent textual characteristics of the document through a systemic functional linguistic (SFL) analysis of the textual metafunction, including the identification of tendencies in Marked and Unmarked Themes and MOOD (Halliday and Matthiessen 2014). The findings could provide an insight into the nature of such regulatory texts as well as providing guidance towards their improvement as the university moves towards the new 2030 Agenda of the United Nations (Naciones Unidas 2018).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00090.jua
2026-04-03
2026-05-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arús Hita, Jorge
    2017 Theme in Spanish. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 194–212. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arús Hita, Jorge & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2024 Systemic functional linguistics: Accessibility and visibility across languages, academic profiles and disciplines. Epos Revista de filología401. 3–34. 10.5944/epos.40.2024.43268
    https://doi.org/10.5944/epos.40.2024.43268 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bello, Iria
    2016 Cognitive implications of nominalizations in the advancement of scientific discourse. International Journal of English Studies16(2). 1–23. 16.1.10.6018/ijes/2016/2/262921. 10.6018/ijes/2016/2/262921
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2016/2/262921 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bloor, Thomas & Meriel Bloor
    2013The functional analysis of English. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203538098
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203538098 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bretón, Angeles
    2024 Qué lugar ocupa la BUAP en la lista de mejores universidades del mundo [What place does BUAP occupy in the list of the best universities in the world?]. Educación [Education]. El Universal Puebla. https://www.eluniversalpuebla.com.mx/educacion/quelugar-ocupa-la-buap-en-la-lista-de-mejores-universidades-del-mundo/. (10 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BUAP
    BUAP. n.d.a. Misión [Mission]. Nosotros [We]. https://www.buap.mx/content/misi%C3%B3n. (10 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BUAP
    BUAP. n.d.b. Visión [View]. Nosotros [We]. https://www.buap.mx/content/visi%C3%B3n. (10 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BUAP
    BUAP. n.d.c. ¿Quiénes somos? [Who are we?]. Nosotros [We]. Coordinación General de Atención a los Universitarios [the general department of university student services]. https://cgau.buap.mx/content/%C2%BFqui%C3%A9nes-somos. (10 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BUAP
    BUAP. n.d.d. Ediciones Gaceta Universidad [University Gaceta editions]. Dirección de Comunicación Institucional [The directorate of institutional communication]. https://comunicacion.buap.mx/?q=content/ediciones-gaceta-universidad. (10 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. BUAP
    BUAP 2023 Anuario Estadístico 2022–2023 [The statistical yearbook from 2022 to 2023]. BUAP en números [BUAP in numbers]. https://repositorio.buap.mx/rdocencia/public/inf_public/2023/0/Anuario-Estadistico2022-2023.pdf. (10 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Burrell, Gibson, Michael. R. Hyman, Christopher Michaelson, Julie A. Nelson, Scott Taylor & Andrew West
    2022 The ethics and politics of academic knowledge production: Thoughts on the future of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics1801. 917–940. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-022-05243-6
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Caffarel-Cayron, Alice, James Robert Martin & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    (eds.) 2004Language typology: A functional perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.253
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.253 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chartered Institute of Linguists
    Chartered Institute of Linguists. n.d.Professional Code of Conduct. https://www.ciol.org.uk/code. (10 February, 2025.)
  14. Creswell, John. W. & J. David Creswell
    2018Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. London: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Davidse, Kristin
    1987 M.A.K. Halliday’s functional grammar and the Prague school. InRené Dirven & Vilém Fried (eds.), Functionalism in linguistics (Linguistic and literary studies in Eastern Europe 20). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 39–79. 10.1075/llsee.20.04dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/llsee.20.04dav [Google Scholar]
  16. Deng, Xudong
    2022Exploring Thematic analysis as a possible self-revision method for ESLIEFL writers. Centre for English Language Communication. National University of Singapore. https://www.nus.edu.sg/celc/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/1-23deng.pdf (26 March, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Downing-Rothwell, Angela
    1997 Encapsulating discourse topics. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense51. 147–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Emilia, Emi & Fuad Abdul Hamied
    2015 Systemic Functional Linguistic Genre Pedagogy (SFL GP) In a tertiary EFL writing context in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal — A publication on the teaching and learning of English261. 155–182. 10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/155‑182
    https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/155-182 [Google Scholar]
  19. Forey, Gail
    2020 A whole school approach to SFL metalanguage and the explicit teaching of language for curriculum learning. Journal of English for Academic Purposes441. 100822. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100822
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100822 [Google Scholar]
  20. Forey, Gail & Nicholas Sampson
    2017 Textual metafunction and Theme: What’s ‘it’ about?InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics. Abingdon, U. K.: Routledge. 131–145. 10.4324/9781315413891
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315413891 [Google Scholar]
  21. García, Ofelia & Cristian Solorza, R.
    2020 Academic language and the minoritization of U.S. bilingual Latinx students. Language and Education35(2). 1–17. 10.1080/09500782.2020.1825476
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1825476 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gobierno de México
    Gobierno de México. n.d.a. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma De Puebla [Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla]. Data México. https://www.economia.gob.mx/data​mexico/es/profile/institution/benemeritauniversidad-autonoma-de-puebla. (10 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gobierno de México
    Gobierno de México. n.d.b. Norma Jurídica [Legal standard]. Sistema de Información Legislativa (SIL) [Legislative nformation system]. sil.gobernacion.gob.mx/Glosario/definicionpop.php?ID=167#:~:text=Regla%20de,%20conducta%20dictada%20o,una%20prescripci%C3%B3n%2C%20autorizaci%C3%B,3n%20o%20prohibici%C3%B3n. (10 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gopalakrishnan, Anuradha, Corinne S. Mathieu & Darren K. LaScotte
    2024 Investigating mixed methods research in applied linguistics: Methodological avoidance and possible barriers in the field. Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL24(1). 1–20. 10.52214/salt.v24i1.10190
    https://doi.org/10.52214/salt.v24i1.10190 [Google Scholar]
  25. Haji, Ghada
    2023 SFL-based analysis of thematic progression of English graduate personal statements. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Learning26(2). 440–453. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a3a9/6430a386e8d1509c94e0a9522d81724d0681.pdf. 10.24071/llt.v26i2.6579
    https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6579 [Google Scholar]
  26. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1967/1968 Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics311: 37–81, 321: 199–244, 421: 179–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1969 Options and functions in the English clause. Brno Studies in English81. 81–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1977 Text as semantic choice in social contexts. InTeun A. van Dijk and János Petofi (eds.). Grammars and descriptions: Studies in text theory and text analysis, 176–225. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1978Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1985An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 1994An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1995 Language and the theory of codes. InA. R. Sadovnik (ed.), Knowledge and pedagogy: The sociology of Basil Bernstein, 127–144. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2004 On the language of physical science. InJ. Webster (ed.), The language of physical science, 162–178. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1989 [1985]Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin
    1993Writing science. London: The Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    1999Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2004An introduction to functional grammar (3rd edition). London: University Press Hodder Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  39. Huang, Guowen
    2017 Theme in the Cardiff Grammar. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 163–177. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Jensen, Klaus Bruhn
    2001 Semiotics. InNeil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 13887–13891. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑043076‑7/04378‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04378-3 [Google Scholar]
  41. Martin, James Robert
    1991 Intrinsic functionality: Implications for contextual theory. Social Semiotics1(1). 99–162. 10.1080/10350339109360331
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350339109360331 [Google Scholar]
  42. Martin, J. R.
    1992English text: System and structure. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  43. Martin, J. R. & Peter Robert White
    2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  44. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    2004 The evolution of language: A systemic functional exploration of phylogenetic phases. InGeoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), Language development: Functional perspectives on evolution and ontogenesis, 45–90. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Kazuhiro Teruya
    2024Systemic functional linguistics: A complete guide. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Kazuhiro Teruya & Marvin Lam
    2010Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. InKazuhiro Teruya & Marvin Lam (eds.). 1st ed.London: Continuum. 10.5040/9781474211888
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474211888 [Google Scholar]
  47. McMillan, James H. & Sally Schumacher
    2005Investigación educativa [Educational research] (5th edition). Spain: Pearson Addison Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Naciones Unidas
    Naciones Unidas 2018 La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: Una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe [The 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals: An opportunity for Latin America and the Caribbean]. https://repositorio.cepal.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/cb30a4de-7d87-4e79-8e7aad5279038718/content. (10 February, 2025.)
  49. Órgano Oficial de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
    Órgano Oficial de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla 2014 Lineamientos del Código de Ética y Conducta de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla [The code of ethics and conduct regulations of the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla]. GACETA Universidad BUAP Suplemento. 182–XXXIII1. 1–8. https://repositorio.buap.mx/rdci/public/inf_public/2014/0/Gaceta182.pdf (10 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1959Course in general linguistics. Edited byCharles Bally & Albert Sechehaye. New York: Philosophical Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sembiante, Sabrina F. & Tian Zhongfeng
    2021 Culturally sustaining approaches to academic languaging through systemic functional linguistics. Language and Education35(2). 101–105. 10.1080/09500782.2021.1896538
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1896538 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sukarno, Sukarno
    2014 Topic development and Thematic patterns for the Indonesian text of Friday sermons. Humaniora26(3). 315–327. 10.22146/jh.v26i3.6190
    https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v26i3.6190 [Google Scholar]
  53. Tesorería General
    Tesorería General 2024 Estado analítico de ingresos (por rubro y Fuente de Financiamiento) [Analytical income statement (by category and Financing Source)]. Información Financiera de Acuerdo a la Ley General de Contabilidad Gubernamental LGCG y Normas del Consejo Nacional de Armonización Contable CONAC [Financial Information According to the General Law of Government Accounting LGCG and Standards of the National Council for Accounting Harmonization CONAC]. BUAP. https://repositorio.buap.mx/rdcg/public/inf_public/2024/2/3a_Edo_analitico_Ingresos_Segundo_Trim_2024.pdf (10 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Thompson, Geoff
    2007 Unfolding Theme: The development of clausal and textual perspectives on Theme. InRuqaiya Hasan, Christian.M. I. M. Matthiessen and Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, 671–96. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. United Nations
    United Nations. n.d.Quality Education. Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/education/. (10 February, 2025).
  56. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana
    Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana 2014Universidades Públicas Mexicanas Diversidad y complejidad Región Centro-Sur Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla [Mexican public universities diversity and complexity: Center-South Region: Benemérita Autonomous University of Puebla]. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311510252_Universidades_Publicas_Mexican_as_Diversidad_y_complejidad_Region_CentroSur_Benemerita_Universidad_Autonoma_de_Puebla. (10 February, 2025.)
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00090.jua
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00090.jua
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): macro-Themes; mexican educational policy; SFL; textual metafunction; Thematised values
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error