1887
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Using articles from two major French newspapers of contrasting ideological viewpoints, this study seeks to explore their representation of cycling the city, and their potential to position readers to view cycling favourably or unfavourably. The analysis, drawing on systemic functional linguistics’ framework, highlights the ways in which readers of both and are positioned to take a positive view of cycling through their listings of the benefits of cycling or praise of bicycle-sharing systems. Conversely, readers may embrace a negative view through their reading about cycling casualties and safety issues. The analysis also shows that a reader of might feel more inclined to take up cycling than a reader of .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.19012.lip
2020-09-18
2020-10-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alba, Dominique
    2014Paris, de la ville à la métropole cyclable. Paris: Atelier Parisien d’Urbanisme.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldred, Rachel
    2016 Stakeholders, politics and media. InMichiel C. J. Bliemer, Corinne Mulley & Claudine J. Moutou (eds.), Handbook on transport and urban planning in the developed world, 165–179. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781783471393.00018
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471393.00018 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bednarek, Monica & Helen Caple
    2017The discourse of news values: How news organizations create newsworthiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190653934.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190653934.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bogdanowicz, Tom
    2004 Cycling and the media. Intermedia32(3). 21–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Caffarel, Alice & Elizabeth Rechniewski
    2008 When is a handover not a handover? A case study of ideologically opposed French news stories. InElizabeth A. Thompson & Peter R. R. White (eds.), Communicating conflict: Multilingual case studies of the news media, 25–49. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chataway, Elijah S., Sigal Kaplan, Thomas A. S. Nielsen & Carlo G. Prato
    2014 Safety perceptions and reported behavior related to cycling in mixed traffic: A comparison between Brisbane and Copenhagen. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour23. 32–43. 10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.021 [Google Scholar]
  7. City of Sydney
    City of Sydney 2018 Cycling. www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/explore/getting-around/cycling (26October 2018.)
  8. Club des villes et territoires cyclables
    Club des villes et territoires cyclables 2018 Le free floating partage le vélo en libre-service. Ville & Vélo78 (article number).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coffin, Caroline & Kieran O’Halloran
    2005 Finding the global groove: Theorising and analysing dynamic reader positioning using appraisal, corpus, and a concordancer. Critical Discourse Studies2(2). 143–163. 10.1080/17405900500283607
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500283607 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2006 The role of appraisal and corpora in detecting covert evaluation. Functions of Language13(1). 77–110. 10.1075/fol.13.1.04cof
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.13.1.04cof [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohen, Philippe
    2012 La couleur politique des médias. Marianne. (27April.)
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Copenhagenize
    Copenhagenize 2017The Copenhagenize bicycle friendly cities index 2017. copenhagenizeindex.eu/ (26October 2018.)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dauncy, Hugh
    2012French cycling: A social and cultural history. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Didelot, Laura
    2017 Le free floating va-t-il rebattre les cartes de la mobilité urbaine?InMobility Tech Green. https://www.mobilitytechgreen.com/free-floating-velos/ (26October 2018.)
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Elioth, Egis Conseil Bâtiments, Quattrolibri & Mana
    2017Paris change d’ère: Vers la neutralité carbone en 2050. Paris: Mairie de Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. English, Peter & Paul Salmon
    2016 New laws, road wars, courtesy and animosity: Cycling safety in Queensland newspapers. Safety Science89. 256–262. 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.023 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fédération Française de Cyclisme [Google Scholar]
  18. Fédération Française des Usagers de la Bicyclette
    Fédération Française des Usagers de la Bicyclette 2017 Baromètre des villes cyclables. https://www.fub.fr/fub/actualites/resultats-barometre-villes-cyclables-edition-2017 (26October 2018.)
  19. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2001 New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. InAlwin Fill & Peter Mühlhäusler (eds.), The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment, 175–202. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Halpern, Charlotte & Patrick Le Galès
    2016From city streets to metropolitan-scale assemblage: Transport policy change in Paris and the Île-de-France region. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Design.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hansen, Anders
    2015 Communication, media and the social construction of the environment. InAnders Hansen & Robert Cox (eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication, 26–38. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315887586
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887586 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hansen, Anders & Robert Cox
    2015 Introduction: Environment and communication. InHansen, Anders & Robert Cox (eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication, 1–10. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315887586
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887586 [Google Scholar]
  23. Héran, Frédéric
    2018 Vélos responsables ou vélos prédateurs?Alternatives Economiques (1March.)
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Horton, David
    2007 Fear of cycling. InDavid Horton, Paul Rosen & Peter Cox (eds.), Cycling and society, 133–152. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jacobsen, Peter L.
    2003 Safety in numbers: More walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Injury Prevention9. 205–209. 10.1136/ip.9.3.205
    https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.9.3.205 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jacqué, Philippe
    2017 La fin du bonus pour le vélo électrique désarçonne. Le Monde (28May.)
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Leplâtre, Simon
    2017 Les Chinois remontent en selle. Le Monde (21January.)
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lévêque, François
    2018 Vélos en libre-service: La lutte pour survivre. The Conversation (6February.)
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Macmillan, Alex, Alex Roberts, James Woodcock, Rachel Aldred & Anna Goodman
    2016 Trends in local newspaper reporting of London cyclist fatalities 1992–2012: The role of the media in shaping the systems dynamics of cycling. Accident Analysis and Prevention86. 137–145. 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.016 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mairie de Paris
    Mairie de Paris 2015Paris capitale du vélo 2020. https://api-site.paris.fr/images/78376 (26October 2018.)
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mairie de Paris
    Mairie de Paris 2017a Parisà vélo. https://www.paris.fr/velo (26October 2018.)
  32. Mairie de Paris
    Mairie de Paris 2017bLe bilan des déplacements en 2016 à Paris. Paris: L’Observatoire des Déplacements à Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mairie de Paris/Inspection générale
    Mairie de Paris/Inspection générale 2016Rapport audit du contrat Vélib’. No.15–20 (article numbers).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Martin, James R.
    2000 Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. InSusan Hunston & Geoffrey Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Martin, James R. & David Rose
    2003Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
    2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills, Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  37. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    2012 Systemic functional linguistics as appliable linguistics: Social accountability and critical approaches. DELTA28. 435–471. 10.1590/S0102‑44502012000300002
    https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502012000300002 [Google Scholar]
  38. McCombs, Maxwell & Amy Reynolds
    2009 How the news shapes our civic agenda. InJennings Bryant & Mary B. Oliver (eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd edition), 1–16. New York & London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Piper, Tessa A., Simon J. Willcox, Catriona Bonfiglioli, Adrian Emilsen & Paul Martin
    2011 Science, media and the public – The framing of the bicycle helmet legislation debate in Australia: A newspaper content analysis. eJournalist11(2). 125–149.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Rissel, Chris, Catriona Bonfiglioli, Adrian Emilsen & Ben J. Smith
    2010 Representations of cycling in metropolitan newspapers – changes over time and differences between Sydney and Melbourne, Australia. BMC Public Health10. 371 (article number). 10.1186/1471‑2458‑10‑371
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-371 [Google Scholar]
  41. Skinner, David & Paul Rosen
    2007 Hell is other cyclists: Rethinking transport and identity. InDavid Horton, Paul Rosen & Peter Cox (eds.), Cycling and society, 83–96. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Walker, Peter
    2015 Sabotage and hatred: What have people got against cyclists?The Guardian (2July.)
    [Google Scholar]
  43. White, Peter R. R.
    2002 Appraisal. InJef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/langct.19012.lip
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.19012.lip
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error