1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that in times of great turbulence scientific writing becomes more conservative. In order to see whether this is true of the period of the First World War, a sample of research articles in the field of the physical sciences for the years 1900, 1910, 1920 and 1930 was studied. Features relating to process types, passives, first person pronouns, themes and nominalisation were considered. This showed that while there was little evidence for the initial conjecture, it was frequently the case that the direction of change altered during the period 1910 to 1920. This change was often maintained in the following decade. Thus, there are significant changes occurring in the period 1910 to 1920 which warrant further study.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.20011.ban
2022-04-06
2022-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkinson, Dwight
    1999Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Banks, David
    1994Writ in water: Aspects of the scientific journal article. Brest: ERLA, Université de Bretagne Occidentale.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2008aThe development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2008b The significance of thematic structure in the scientific journal article, 1700–1980. InNina Nørgard (ed.), Systemic functional linguistics in use. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communications, 29. www.sdu.dk/da/Om_SDU/Institutter_centre/Isk/Forskningspublikationer/OWPLC.aspx5
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2016 On the (non)necessity of the hybrid category behavioural process. InDonna R. Miller & Paul Bayley (eds.), Hybridity in systemic functional linguistics: Grammar, text and discursive context, 21–40. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2017The birth of the academic article: Le Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions 1665–1700: Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2018 The effects of revolution and war on academic discourse, 1785–1835, Textes & Contextes, 13 (2). https://preo.u-bourgogne.fr/textesetcontextes/index.php?id=2355
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2019a SFL and diachronic studies. InGeoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 410–432. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316337936.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.018 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2019bA systemic functional grammar of English: A simple introduction. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429467844
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467844 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2021 Turbulent periods and the development of the scientific research article 1735–1835. Journal of Historical Pragmatics22 (1). Available online27.08.2021.   10.1075/jhp.18010.ban
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.18010.ban [Google Scholar]
  11. Barber, Charles L.
    1962 Some measureable characteristics of modern scientific prose. InFrank Behre (ed.), Contributions to English syntax and philology, 21–43. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cooray, Mahiinda
    1967 The English passive voice. English Language Teaching21 (3). 203–210. 10.1093/elt/XXI.3.203
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/XXI.3.203 [Google Scholar]
  13. Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stephania & Elke Teich
    2018 Using relative entropy for detection and analysis of periods of diachronic linguistic change. InAlex Beatrice, Setphania Degaetano-Ortlie, Anna Feldman, Anna Kazantseva, Nils Reiter & Stan Szpakowicz (eds.), Proceedings of workshop on computational linguistics for cultural heritage: Social sciences, humanities and literature, 22–33. Santa Fe: New Mexico.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ding, Daniel D.
    2002 The passive voice and social values in science. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication32 (2). 137–154. 10.2190/EFMR‑BJF3‑CE41‑84KK
    https://doi.org/10.2190/EFMR-BJF3-CE41-84KK [Google Scholar]
  15. Dušková, Libuša
    1971 On some functional and stylistic aspects of the passive voice in present-day English. Philologica Pragensia14. 117–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Eggins, Suzanne
    1994An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gross, Alan G., Joseph E. Harmon & Michael Reidy
    2002Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1978Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1987 Language and the order of nature. InNigel Fabb, Derek Attridge, Alan Durant & Colin MacCabe (eds.), The linguistics of writing: Arguments between language and literature, 135–154. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Reprinted inMichael A. K. Halliday, On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 116–138. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1988 On the language of physical science. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features, 162–178. London: Pinter. Reprinted inMichael A. K. Halliday & James R. Martin 1993 Writing science. Literacy and discursive power, 54–68. London: Falmer Press, and in Michael A. K. Halliday 2004 The language of science, 140–158. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1998 Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. InJames R. Martin & Robert Veel (eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, 185–235. London: Routledge. Reprinted inMichael A. K. Halliday 2004 The language of science, 49–101. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1989 Some grammatical problems in scientific English. InMichael A. K. Halliday 2004a The language of science, 159–180. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2004b [1997] On the grammar of scientific English. InMichael A. K. Halliday 2004 The language of science, 181–198. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2004c [1999] The grammatical construction of scientific knowledge: The framing of the English clause. InMichael A. K. Halliday 2004 The language of science, 102–134. Edited byJonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Halliday, Michael A. K. Revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  26. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hassan
    1989Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin
    1993Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Huddleston, Rodney D.
    1971The sentence in written English: A syntactic study based on an analysis of scientific texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hundt, Marianne, Gerold Schneider & Elena Seoane
    2016 The use of the be-passive in academic Englishes: Local versus global usage in an international language. Corpora11 (1). 29–61.   10.3366/cor.2016.0084
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2016.0084 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hundt, Marianne, Melanie Röthlisberger & Elena Seoane
    2021 Predicting voice alternation across academic Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory17 (1). 189–222.   10.1515/cllt‑2017‑0050
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2017-0050 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hyland, Ken
    2001 Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes20 (3). 207–226. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00012‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2002 Options of identity in academic writing?ELT Journal56 (4). 351–358. https://academic.oup.com/elt/article-abstract/56/4/351/410117. 10.1093/elt/56.4.351
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.351 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2010 Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes9. 116–127.   10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
    2016 Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication33 (3). 251–274. 10.1177/0741088316650399
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650399 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
    2017 Is academic writing becoming more informal?English for Specific Purposes45. 40–51.   10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
    2018 “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes51. 18–30.   10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kermes, Hannah, Stefania Degaetano-Ortieb, Ashraf Khamis, Jörg Knappen & Elke Teich
    2016 The Royal Society Corpus: From uncharted data to corpus. InNicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Marko Grobelnik, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Helene Mazo, Asuneion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the tenth international conference on language resources and evaluation. Portorož, Slovenia, 1928–1931.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Martin, James R. & David Rose
    2008Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Moskowich, Isabel & Begoña Crespo
    (eds.) 2012Astronomy ‘playne and simple’: The writing of science between 1700 and 1900. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.173
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.173 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rubino, Raphael, Stephania Degaetano-Ortlieb, Elke Teich & Josef van Genabith
    2016 Modelling diachronic change in scientific writing with information density. InYuji Matsumoto & Rachmi Prasad (eds.), Proceedings of COLING 2016, 750–761. Osaka, Japan.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Salager-Meyer, Françoise
    1999 From “Mr. Guthrie is profoundly mistaken…” to “Our data do not seem to confirm the results of a previous study on…”: A diachronic study of polemicity in academic writing (1810–1995). Iberica. Revista de la Asociasión Europea de Lenguas para Fines Especificos1. 5–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Salager-Meyer, Françoise & Nahirana Zambrano
    2001 The bitter sweet rhetoric of controversiality in nineteenth- and twentieth-century French and English medical literature. Journal of Historical Pragmatics2 (1). 141–173. 10.1075/jhp.2.1.07sal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.2.1.07sal [Google Scholar]
  43. Seoane, Elena
    2006 Changing styles: On the recent evolution of scientific British and American English. InChristiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikelaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds.), Syntax, style and grammatical norms: English from 1500–2000, 191–209. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Seoane, Elena & Marianne Hundt
    2018 Voice alternation and authorial presence: Variation across disciplinary areas in academic English. Journal of English Linguistics46 (1). 3–22.   10.1177/0075424217740938
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424217740938 [Google Scholar]
  45. Seoane, Elena & Lucia Loureiro-Porto
    2005 On the colloquialization of scientific British and American English. ESP Across Cultures2. 106–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Seoane, Elena & Christopher Williams
    2006 Changing the rules: A comparison of recent trends in English in academic scientific discourse and prescriptive legal discourse. InMarina Dossena & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on domain-specific English, 255–276. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Taavitsainen, Irma & Päivi Pahta
    (eds.) 2011Medical writing in early modern English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921193
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921193 [Google Scholar]
  48. Teich, Elke, Stenfania Degaetano-Ortlieb, Peter Fankhauser, Hannah Kermes & Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski
    2016 The linguistic construal of disciplinarity: A data-mining approach using register features. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67 (7). 1668–1678. 10.1002/asi.23457
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23457 [Google Scholar]
  49. Thompson, Geoff
    2004Introducing functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Valle, Ellen
    1999A collective intelligence: The life sciences in the Royal Society as a scientific discourse community, 1665–1965. Turku: Anglicana Turuensia.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Perman, E. P. & G. A. S. Atkinson
    1900 Vapour-density of bromine at high temperatures. Proceedings of the Royal Society66. 10–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rayleigh, L.
    1900 On the viscosity of argon as affected by temperature. Proceedings of the Royal Society66. 68–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Hardy, W. B.
    1900 On the mechanism of gelation in reversible colloidal systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society66. 95–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Burch, G. J.
    1900 On the relation of artificial colour-blindness in successive contrast. Proceedings of the Royal Society66. 204–216.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wood, R. W.
    1900 Photography of sound-waves, and the kinematographic demonstration of the evolutions of reflected wave-fronts. Proceedings of the Royal Society66. 283–290. 10.1080/14786440009463896
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440009463896 [Google Scholar]
  56. Turner, H. H.
    1900 On the brightness of the corona of April 16, 1893. Preliminary note. Proceedings of the Royal Society66. 403–409.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Mallock, A.
    1910 The damping of sound by frothy liquids. Proceedings of the Royal Society A84. 391–395.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Bohr, N.
    1910 On the determination of the tension of a recently formed water-surface. Proceedings of the Royal Society A84. 395–403.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Darwin, G. H.
    1910 On a mistake in the instruction for the use of a certain apparatus in tidal reductions. Proceedings of the Royal Society A84. 423–425.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Lockyer, N.
    1910 On the sequence of chemical forms in stellar spectra. Proceedings of the Royal Society A84. 426–432.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Ivon, G. J.
    1910 The absorption spectra of sulphur vapour at different temperatures and pressures and their relation to the molecular complexity of this element. Proceedings of the Royal Society A84. 311–324.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Dyson, F. W.
    1910 On the improbability of a random distribution of the stars in space. Proceedings of the Royal Society A84. 369–371.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. MacDonald, H. M.
    1920 The transmission of electric waves around the Earth’s surface. Proceedings of the Royal Society A98. 216–222.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Schuster, A.
    1920 On the absorption and scattering of light. Proceedings of the Royal Society A98. 248–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Merton, T. R.
    1920 On the effect of concentration on the spectra of luminous gases. Proceedings of the Royal Society A98. 255–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Dobbie, J. J. & J. J. Fox
    1920 The absorption of light by elements in the state of vapour: selenium, and tellurium; mercury, zinc, cadmium; phosphorus, arsenic, antimony. Proceedings of the Royal Society A98. 147–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Jenkin, C. F.
    1920 Dilatation and compressibility of liquid carbonic acid. Proceedings of the Royal Society A98. 170–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Lamb, Horace
    1920 On the vibrations of an elastic plate in contact with water. Proceedings of the Royal Society A98. 295–216.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Watson, G. N.
    1930 The use of series of Bessel functions in problems connected with cylindrical wind-tunnels. Proceedings of the Royal Society A130. 29–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Abell, T. B. & J. H. Lamble
    1930 The distribution of velocity in an open channel of rectangular section. Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 130. 90–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Brunt, D.
    1930 Some phenomena connected with the transfer of heat by radiation and turbulence in the lower atmosphere. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 130. 98–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Davidson, P. M. & W. C. Price
    1930 Extended energy functions of the hydrogen molecule. Proceedings of the Royal Society A130. 105–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Egerton, A. C. & M. Milford
    1930 On optical pyrometry. Proceedings of the Royal Society A130. 111–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Wheeler, R. B.
    1930 An integrating photometer for X-ray crystal analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society A130. 120–133.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/langct.20011.ban
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.20011.ban
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error