1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study reports on a four-semester teaching programme for foreign language (FL) intermediate writing abilities in Spanish to be implemented in educational practice. The study conducts qualitative analysis, drawing on systemic functional linguistics (SFL), of developmental changes in twenty undergraduate, Spanish Level 4 students, based on their performance of, and comments on, pre- and post-instructional written tasks, focusing on meaning-making choices in the construction of a historical recount genre over one semester of instruction at an Australian university. Responding to the need for research on academic writing in FL, the paper shows that SFL facilitates students’ understanding of writing development in an FL as they explore textual, ideational and interpersonal meanings in conjunction with required lexicogrammatical choices to fulfil the rhetorical demands of this genre.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.21005.she
2022-04-06
2022-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Achugar, Mariana &, María C. Colombi
    2008 Systemic functional linguistic explorations into the longitudinal study of advanced capacities: The case of Spanish heritage language learners. InLourdes Ortega & Heidi Byrnes (eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities, 36–57. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Armour, William & Reiko Furuya
    2013 Learning how to mean in Japanese as an additional language. InElizabeth Thomson & William Armour (eds.), Systemic functional perspectives of Japanese: Descriptions and applications, 210–253. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arús, Jorge
    2010 On theme in English and Spanish: A comparative study. InElizabeth Swain (ed.), Thresholds and potentialities of systemic functional linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specialised discourses, 23–48. Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrnes, Heidi
    2009 Emergent L2 German writing ability in curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education20. 50–66.   10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2011 Beyond writing as language learning or content learning: Construction foreign language writing as meaning-making. InRosa Manchón (ed.), Learning-to-write- and writing-to-learn in an additional language, 133–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company. 10.1075/lllt.31.11byr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31.11byr [Google Scholar]
  6. 2012 Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A systemic functional linguistic approach. InRosa Manchón (ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives, 191–219. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781934078303.191
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078303.191 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2013 Positioning writing as meaning-making in writing research: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing22. 95–106.   10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2018 Advanced-level grammatical development in instructed SFL. InPaul A. Malovrh & Alessandro G. Benati (eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition, 133–156. London: Wiley Blackwell.   10.1002/9781119261650.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119261650.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  9. Byrnes, Heidi, Hiram H. Maxim & John M. Norris
    2010 Realizing advanced L2 writing development in collegiate FL education: Curricular design, pedagogy, and assessment. Modern Language Journal94 (Supplement) 1–235. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40985261
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Caffarel, Alice
    2006 Learning advanced French through SFL: Learning SFL in French. InHeidi Byrnes (ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, 204–224. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Christie, Frances
    2012Language education throughout school years: A functional perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Christie, Frances & Beverly Derewianka
    2010School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Coffin, Caroline
    1997 Constructing and giving value to the past: an investigation into secondary school history. InFrances Christie & James R. Martin (eds.), Genre and institutions, 196–239. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2006 Reconstruing ‘personal time’ as ‘collective time’: Learning the discourse of history. InRachael Whittaker, Mick O’Donnell & Anne McCabe (eds.), Language and literacy, 207–232. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Colombi, María C.
    2006 Grammatical metaphor: Academic language development in Latino students in Spanish. InHeidi Byrnes (ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, 147–163. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2009 A systemic functional approach to teaching Spanish for heritage speakers in the United States. Linguistics and Education20. 39–49.   10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  17. Costino, Kimberly A. & Sunny Hyon
    2011 Sidestepping our ‘‘scare words’’: Genre as a possible bridge between L1 and L2 compositionists. Journal of Second Language Writing20. 24–44.   10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Derewianka, Beverly & Pauline Jones
    2016Teaching language in context. (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Eggins, Susan
    1994An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd edition). London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gal, Susan & Kathryn A. Woolard
    2001 Constructing languages and publics: Authority and representation. InSusan Gal & Kathryn A. Woolard (eds.), Languages & publics, 1–13. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibbons, John
    1999 Register aspects on literacy in Spanish. Written Language and Literacy2 (10). 63–88. 10.1075/wll.2.1.05gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.2.1.05gib [Google Scholar]
  22. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1994An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 1996 On grammar & grammatics. InRuqaiya Hasan, David G. Butt & Carmel Cloran (eds.), Functional descriptions: Language form & linguistic theory, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.121.03hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.121.03hal [Google Scholar]
  24. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    1999Construing experience through meaning: A language–based approach to cognition. London & New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hood, Sue
    2010Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230274662
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274662 [Google Scholar]
  26. Humphrey, Sally & Lucy Mcnaught
    2016 Functional language instruction and the writing growth of English language learners in the middle years. TESOL Quarterly50 (4). 792–816.   10.1002/tesq.247
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.247 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hyland, Ken
    2003 Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing12. 17–29.   10.1016/S1060‑3743(02)00124‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba
    2005 Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes24. 269–292.   10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  29. Liardét, Cassi
    2013 An exploration of Chinese EFL learners’ deployment of grammatical metaphor: Learning to make academically valued meaning. Journal of Second Language Writing22.161–178.   10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  30. Liardét, Cassi & Sharyn Black
    2019 “So and so” says, states and argues: A corpus-assisted engagement analysis of reporting verbs. Journal of Second Language Writing44. 37–50. 10.1016/j.jslw.2019.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Manchón, Rosa
    2011Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 10.1075/lllt.31
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mar-Molinero, Clare
    2008 Language authority in global Spanish. International Multilingual Research Journal2. 27–47. 10.1080/19313150701766805
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19313150701766805 [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin, James R.
    1992English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  34. 1993 Genre and literacy-modelling in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics13. 141–172. 10.1017/S0267190500002440
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002440 [Google Scholar]
  35. 1997 Analysing genre: functional parameters. InFrances Christie & James R. Martin (eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, 3–39. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2002 Writing history: Constructing time and value in discourse of the past. InMary Schleppegrell & María C. Colombi (eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages, 87–118. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Martin, James R. & David Rose
    2007Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2008Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ortega, Lourdes
    2003 Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied linguistics24. 492–518.   10.1093/applin/24.4.492
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2012 Interlanguage complexity: A construct in search of theoretical renewal. InBernd Kortmann & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact, 127–255. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.   10.1515/9783110229226.127
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229226.127 [Google Scholar]
  41. Oteíza, Tesesa & Derrin Pinto
    2008 Agency, responsibility and silence in the construction of contemporary history in Chile and Spain. Discourse & Society19 (3). 333–358.   10.1177/0957926508088964
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088964 [Google Scholar]
  42. Oteíza, Teresa & Mariana Achugar
    2018 History textbooks and the construction of dictatorship. InEckhardt Fuchs & Annekatrin Bock (eds.), Palgrave handbook of textbook studies, 305–318. New York: Palgrave.   10.1057/978‑1‑137‑53142‑1_22
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53142-1_22 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ramzan, Yuko & Elizabeth Thompson
    2013 Modelling writing: Using the genre approach in the Japanese as a foreign language classroom. InElizabeth Thomson & William Armour (eds.), Systemic functional perspectives of Japanese: Descriptions and applications, 254–283. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Ravelli, Louise
    2004 Familiar territory, shifting grounds: Aspects of organization in written texts. InLouise Ravelli & Rod Ellis (eds.), Analysing academic writing: Contextualized frameworks, 104–130. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rose, David & James R. Martin
    2012Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ryshina-Pankova, Marianna
    2015 A meaning-based approach to the study of complexity in L2 writing: The case of grammatical metaphor. Journal of Second Language Writing29. 51–63.   10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ryshina-Pankova, Marianna & Heidi Byrnes
    2013 Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing22. 179–197.   10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  48. Schleppegrell, Mary
    2004The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410610317
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610317 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2012 Academic language in teaching and learning. The Elementary School Journal112 (3). 409–418. 10.1086/663297
    https://doi.org/10.1086/663297 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2013 The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning63 (1). 153–170.   10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00742.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Sheldon, Elena
    2018Knowledge construction in academia: A challenge for multilingual scholars. London: Peter Lang. hdl.handle.net/10453/128506. 10.3726/b13213
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b13213 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2020 We cannot abandon the two worlds, we have to be in both: Chilean scholars’ views on publishing in English and Spanish. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes1 (2). 119–141.   10.1075/jerpp.19016.she
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.19016.she [Google Scholar]
  53. Teruya, Kazuhiro
    2006 Grammar as a resource for the construction of language logic for advanced language learning in Japanese. InHeidi Byrnes (ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, 109–133. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tinsley, Teresa
    2011 Language in the education system; Why Spanish?InPhilip Powell Davies (ed.), Word for word: The social, economic and political impact of Spanish and English, 107–118. Madrid: Santillana.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Velázquez-Mendoza, Omar
    2015 The role of grammatical metaphor in the development of advanced literacy in Spanish as a first, second, and heritage language. Functional Linguistics2 (7). 1–13. 10.1186/s40554‑015‑0020‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-015-0020-y [Google Scholar]
  56. Yasuda, Sachiko
    2015 Exploring changes in FL writer’s meaning-making choices in summary writing: A systemic functional approach. Journal of Second Language Writing27. 105–121.   10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.008 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/langct.21005.she
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.21005.she
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error