1887
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Well-known cases of wrongful convictions (e.g. Central Park Five, Steven Avery, Amanda Knox), although merely the tip of the iceberg, serve to highlight flaws inherent in justice systems worldwide (cf. Garrett 2011). Many innocent people are having their freedom taken away without reason. One such lesser-known, though very significant, case is that of Kristine Bunch, who was wrongfully convicted of arson and murdering her son, resulting in her wrongful imprisonment for 17 years. To examine how Kristine represents her miscarriage of justice discursively, I examine transitivity patterns (Halliday & Matthiessen 2014) in a semi-structured interview with her and, in doing so, aim to create awareness of some probable key language processes in wrongful convictions more generally.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.22002.bar
2022-09-29
2022-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, William C.
    2015 Conducting semi-structured interviews. InKathryn E. Newcomer, Harry P. Hatry & Joseph S. Wholey (eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation: Essential texts for nonprofit and public leadership and management (4th edition). 492–505. New Jersey: John Wiley. 10.1002/9781119171386.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, Karen & Daniel F. Wozniak
    2010 The language of healing: Women’s voices in healing and recovering from domestic violence. Social Work in Mental Health9 (1). 37–55. 10.1080/15332985.2010.494540
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2010.494540 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartley, Leanne
    2018 “Justice demands that you find this man not guilty”: A transitivity analysis of the closing arguments of a rape case that resulted in a wrongful conviction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics28. 480–495. 10.1111/ijal.12227
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12227 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2020 “Please make your verdict speak the truth”: Insights from an appraisal analysis of the closing arguments from a rape trial. Text & Talk40 (4). 421–442. 10.1515/text‑2020‑2065
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-2065 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bednarek, Monika
    2008Emotion talk across corpora. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230285712
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285712 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell, Lisa
    2015 The social construction of wrongful convictions in Canadian news coverage. Unpublished MA thesis. The University of Guelph. viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fatrium.lib.uoguelph.c%2Fxmlui%2Fbitstream%2Fhandle%2F10214%2F9415%2Fbell_Lisa_201512_MA.pdf%3Bsequence%3D3&clen=1317942. (Retrieved on10 June, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
    2019 Rethinking Martin & White’s affect taxonomy: A psychologically-inspired approach to the linguistic expression of emotion. InJohn L. Mackenzie & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), Emotion in discourse, 301–331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.302.12ben
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302.12ben [Google Scholar]
  8. Bletzer, Keith V. & Mary P. Koss
    2010 Narrative constructions of sexual violence as told by female rape survivors in three populations of the southwestern United States: Scripts of coercion, scripts of consent. Cross-Cultural Studies in Health and Illness23. 113–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bock, Zannie
    2009 Construals of agency in the testimony of Colin de Souza. InStef Slembrouck, Miriam Taverniers & Mieke van Herreweghe (eds.), From will to well: Studies in linguistics offered to Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, 43–53. Ghent: Academia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bock, Zannie & Paul Duncan
    2006 Transitivity and the narrator’s role in selected TRC testimonies. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS34. 35–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bonventre, Catherine L.
    2020 Wrongful convictions and forensic science. WIREs Forensic Sci3. 10.1002/wfs2.1406. (Retrieved on8 September, 2021).
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1406 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brants, Chrisje
    2013 Tunnel vision, belief perseverance and bias confirmation: Only human?InC. Ronald Huff & Martin Killias (eds.), Wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice: Causes and remedies in North American and European criminal justice systems, 161–192. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. California Innocence Project
    California Innocence Project 2021https://californiainnocenceproject.org/. (Retrieved on10 June, 2021).
  14. Carlson, Eve B. & Constance J. Dalenberg
    2000 A conceptual framework for the impact of traumatic experiences. Trauma, Violence & Abuse1 (1). 4–28. 10.1177/1524838000001001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838000001001002 [Google Scholar]
  15. Christianson, Scott
    2004Innocent: Inside wrongful conviction cases. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Clow, Kimberley A., Amy M. Leach & Rose Ricciardelli
    2012 Life after wrongful conviction. InBrian L. Cutler (ed.), Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research, 327–341. Washington: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/13085‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1037/13085-015 [Google Scholar]
  17. Clow, Kimberley A. & Amy M. Leach
    2015 Stigma and wrongful conviction: All exonerees are not perceived equal. Psychology, Crime & Law21 (2). 172–185. 10.1080/1068316X.2014.951645
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.951645 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cole, Simon A.
    2012 Forensic science and wrongful convictions: From exposer to contributor to corrector. New England Law Review46. 711–736.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Covey, Russell
    2012 Police misconduct as a cause of wrongful convictions. Washington University Law Review90 (4). 1133–1189.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cross, William E. & Anne Galletta
    2013Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York & London: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Danet, Brenda
    1980 Language in the courtroom. InHoward Giles, W. Peter Robinson & Phillip M. Smith (eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives, 367–376. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑024696‑3.50062‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-024696-3.50062-4 [Google Scholar]
  22. De Fina, Anna & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
    2012Analysing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Drizin, Steven A. & Beth A. Colgan
    2004 Tales from the juvenile confession front. InG. Daniel Lassiter (ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment. Perspectives in law & psychology, 127–162. Boston, MA: Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑38598‑3_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38598-3_6 [Google Scholar]
  24. Eades, Diana
    2010Sociolinguistics and the legal process. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692559
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692559 [Google Scholar]
  25. Edwards, Derek & Jonathon Potter
    1992Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Felton-Rosulek, Laura
    2010 Prosecution and defense closing speeches: The creation of contrastive closing arguments. InAlison Johnson & Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics, 218–230. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203855607.ch15
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855607.ch15 [Google Scholar]
  27. Findley, Keith A.
    2012 Tunnel vision. InBrian L. Cutler (ed.), Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research, 303–323. Washington: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/13085‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1037/13085-014 [Google Scholar]
  28. Footitt, Hilary
    2002Women, Europe and the new languages of politics. London: Continuum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Garrett, Brandon L.
    2011Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674060982
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674060982 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gould, Jon B. & Richard A. Leo
    2010 One hundred years later: Wrongful convictions after a century of research. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology100 (3). 825–868.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Grebler, Gillian
    2005 “And then what did she say?” Making confession statements believable and compelling (even when they are false). Paper presented at the International Association of Forensic Linguists 7th Biennial Conference on Forensic Linguistics/Language and Law. Cardiff University (1st – 4th July, 2005).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gross, Samuel R., Kristen Jacoby, Daniel J. Matheson, Nicholas Montgomery & Sujata Patil
    2005 Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology95 (2). 523–560.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gwilliams, Laura & Lise Fontaine
    2015 Indeterminacy in process type classification. Functional Linguistics2 (8). 1–19. 10.1186/s40554‑015‑0021‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-015-0021-x [Google Scholar]
  34. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1985An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  36. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Jonathon J. Webster
    2014Text linguistics: The how and why of meaning. United Kingdom: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hattingh, Natalie
    2011 A systemic functional analysis of two truth and reconciliation commission testimonies: Transitivity and genre. Unpublished Master Thesis. University of Western Cape. viewer.html?pdfurl=http%3A%2F%2Fetd.Uwc.ac.za%2Fxmlui%2Fbitstream%2Fhandle%2F11394%2F1464%2Fhattingh_MA_2011.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1%26isAllowed%3Dy&clen=882351. (Retrieved on15 February, 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Haworth, Kate
    2012 Language of police interviews. InCarol A. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 3079–3084. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0631
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0631 [Google Scholar]
  39. Heffer, Chris
    2020All bullshit and lies?: Insincerity, irresponsibility, and the judgment of untruthfulness. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190923280.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923280.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Henderson, Kelsey S. & Lora M. Levett
    2018 Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas. Law and Human Behavior42. 427–441. 10.1037/lhb0000297
    https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000297 [Google Scholar]
  41. Heydon, Georgina
    2005The language of police interviewing: A critical analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230502932
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502932 [Google Scholar]
  42. Huff, Ronald C., Ayre Rattner & Edward Sagarin
    1996Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. California: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781452220543
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452220543 [Google Scholar]
  43. Innocence Canada
    Innocence Canada 2021https://www.innocencecanada.com/causes-of-wrongful-convictions/. (Retrieved on14 May, 2021).
  44. Johnson, David T.
    2020The culture of capital punishment in Japan. Palgrave advances in criminology and criminal justice in Asia. Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Leo, Richard A.
    2008Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674033702
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674033702 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2009 False confessions: Causes, consequences and implications. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law37. 332–343.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Levy, Inna & Eyal Eckhaus
    2020 Rape narratives analysis through natural language processing: Survivor self-label, narrative time span, faith, and rape terminology. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy12 (6). 635–642. 10.1037/tra0000587
    https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000587 [Google Scholar]
  48. Makani, Bharat
    2018 Voices of the condemned: A comparative study of the testimonies of death row exonerees and slave narratives. Law, Culture and the Humanities14 (1). 140–160. 10.1177/1743872114556435
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872114556435 [Google Scholar]
  49. Marsili, Neri
    2020 Lying, speech acts, and commitment. Synthese. viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com2Fcontent%2Fpdf%2F10.1007%2Fs11229-020-02933-4.pdf&clen=419902&chunk=true. (Retrieved on18 March, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Martin, James R. & David Rose
    2007Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
    2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  52. Natapoff, Alexandra
    2009Snitching: Criminal informants and the erosion of American justice. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Neale, Amy
    2002 More delicate TRANSITIVITY: Extending the process type system networks for English to include full semantic classifications. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Cardiff University. viewer.html?pdfurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.isfla.org%2Fsystemics%2Fprint%2Ftheses%2Famy_neale_final_thesis.pdf&clen=2867317&chunk=true. (Retrieved on1 May, 2013).
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Norris, Robert J., Catherine L. Bonventre, Allison D. Redlich, James R. Acker & Carmen Lowe
    2017 Preventing wrongful convictions: An analysis of state investigation reforms. Criminal Justice Policy Review30 (4). 597–626. 10.1177/0887403416687359
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416687359 [Google Scholar]
  55. O’Donnell, Michael, Michele Zappavigna & Casey Whitelaw
    2008 A survey of process type classification over difficult cases. InCarys Jones & Eija Ventola (eds.), From language to multimodality: New developments in the study of ideational meaning, 47–64. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. O’Donnell, Michael
    2020 UAM Corpus Tool 5.0. www.corpustool.com/. (Retrieved on10 February, 2021).
  57. Pezdek, Kathy
    2012 Fallible eyewitness memory and identification. InBrian L. Cutler (ed.), Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research, 105–124. Washington: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/13085‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1037/13085-005 [Google Scholar]
  58. Redlich, Allison D.
    2010 The susceptibility of juveniles to false confessions and false guilty pleas. Rutgers Law Review62 (4). 943–957.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Reichart, Brian
    2016 Tunnel vision: Causes, effects, and mitigation strategies. Hofstra Law Review45 (2). 451–477.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Rizzelli, Lucrezia
    2019 Linguistic features of false confessions and confessions not in dispute: A corpus analysis. Unpublished MA Thesis. City of University New York (CUNY). https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1119&context=jj_etds (Retrieved on1 March, 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Scherr, Kyle C., Allison D. Redlich & Saul M. Kassin
    2020 Cumulative disadvantage: A psychological framework for understanding how innocence can lead to confession, wrongful conviction, and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1–31. 10.1177/1745691619896608
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619896608 [Google Scholar]
  62. Simon, Dan
    2012In doubt: The psychology of the criminal justice process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674065116
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674065116 [Google Scholar]
  63. Simpson, David
    1992 Lying, liars and language. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research52 (3). 623–639. 10.2307/2108211
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2108211 [Google Scholar]
  64. Statham, Simon
    2016Redefining trial by media: Towards a critical forensic linguistic interface. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.67
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.67 [Google Scholar]
  65. Stygall, Gail
    1994Trial language: Differential discourse processing and discursive formation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.26
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.26 [Google Scholar]
  66. The Innocence Project
    The Innocence Project 2021https://innocenceproject.org/. (Retrieved on14 May, 2021).
  67. Thompson, William C.
    2008 Beyond bad apples: Analyzing the role of forensic science in wrongful convictions. Southwestern University Law Review37. 971–994.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Van Der Kolk, Bessel A.
    2002 Trauma and memory. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences52 (1). 52–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Warden, Rob
    2004 The snitch system: How snitch testimony sent Randi Steidl and other innocent Americans to death row. Centre on wrongful convictions. Northwestern University School of Law, www.law.northwestern.edu/wrongfulconvictions. (Retrieved on9 May, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/langct.22002.bar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.22002.bar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error