1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language, Context and Text
  4. Volume 7, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-7233
  • E-ISSN: 2589-7241
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics of , the grammar of quoting and reporting, in Dagaare (Niger-Congo: Mabia). The study reveals that verbal, mental, and relational processes project other clauses in Dagaare. Projection is encoded by a versatile particle () that serves as: (i) a nexus marker between projecting and projected clauses; (ii) a textual Theme, indexing anaphora and (iii) an interpersonal Theme, indexing evidentiality. Both quotes and reports are paratactically related to the projecting clause. Further, there is no one-to-one correspondence between the paratactic units in reporting and their division into tone groups. Finally, in addition to verbs, nominal predicates can also project reports. The study concludes that beyond its logico-semantics, projection crucially enacts epistemic stance, contributes to discourse organisation, and indicate interactional cues.

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/langct.23011.mwi
2025-09-05
2026-04-17

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/langct.23011.mwi
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arús-Hita, Jorge
    2024 The intricate construction of projection in news reports: A contrastive Spanish/English account. Languages in Contrast25(1). 122–147. 10.1075/lic.22002.ars
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.22002.ars [Google Scholar]
  2. Arús-Hita, Jorge, Kazuhiro Teruya, Mohamed A. Bardi, Abhishek K. Kashyap & Isaac N. Mwinlaaru
    2018 Quoting and reporting across languages: A system-based and text-based typology. Word64(2). 69–102. 10.1080/00437956.2018.1463001
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2018.1463001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardi, Mohamed Ali
    2022 Semogenic variation in the construal of sayerhood in Arabic. Language, Context and Text4(2). 259–303. 10.1075/langct.21014.bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.21014.bar [Google Scholar]
  4. Bodomo, Adams
    1997 The structure of Dagaare. Stanford: Stanford University, CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Caffarel, Alice, J. R. Martin & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    (eds.) 2004 Language typology: A functional perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.253
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.253 [Google Scholar]
  6. D’Arcy, Alexandra
    2015 Quotation and advances in understanding syntactic systems. Annu. Rev. Linguist1(1). 43–61. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑125220
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125220 [Google Scholar]
  7. Deutscher, Guy
    2011 The grammaticalization of quotatives. InBernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 646–655. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0053
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0053 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.
    2001 Logophoric marking and represented speech in African languages as evidential hedging strategies. Australian Journal of Linguistics21(1). 131–157. 10.1080/07268600120042499
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600120042499 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2006 Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Complementation, 1–48. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199297870.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199297870.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Finnegan, Ruth
    2011 Why do we quote: The culture and history of quotation. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. 10.2307/j.ctt5vjt3z
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjt3z [Google Scholar]
  11. Güldemann, Tom
    2002 When ‘say’ is not say: The functional versatility of the Bantu quotative marker ti with special reference to Shona. InTom Güldemann & Manfred von Roncador (eds.), Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains, 253–288. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.52.18gul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.52.18gul [Google Scholar]
  12. 2008 Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211450
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211450 [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1985 Introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim, Mira, J. R. Martin, Gi-Hyun Shin & Gyung Hee Choi
    2023 Korean grammar: A systemic functional approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University. 10.1017/9781009019941
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009019941 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig
    (eds.) 2016 Ethnologue: Languages of the world (19th edition). Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: www.ethnologue.com
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lyons, Jesus D. G. & Gillian Moss
    2021 Construing symbolic exchange in academic registers of Spanish: Sayers and projection in linguistics articles in Colombian journals. InKathy L. Lin, Isaac N. Mwinlaaru & Dennis Tay (eds.), Approaches to specialized genres, 154–173. London & New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    2004 Descriptive motifs and generalisations. InAlice Caffarel, J. R. Martin & Christian Matthiessen (eds.), Language typology: A functional perspective, 537–674. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.253.12mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.253.12mat [Google Scholar]
  19. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Kazuhiro Teruya
    2013 Projection in English: The environment of quoting. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics39(2). 50–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. McGregor, William
    1994 The grammar of reported speech and thought in Gooniyandi. Australian Journal of Linguistics14(1). 63–92. 10.1080/07268609408599502
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07268609408599502 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2019 Reported speech as a dedicated grammatical domain — and why defenestration should not be thrown out the window. Linguistic Typology23(1). 207–219. 10.1515/lingty‑2019‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0010 [Google Scholar]
  22. Mwinlaaru, Isaac N.
    2017 A systemic functional description of the grammar of Dagaare. PhD dissertation. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 2018 Grammaticalising attitude: Clause juncture particles and negotiation in Dagaare. InAkila S. Baklouti & Lise Fontaine (eds.), Perspectives from systemic functional linguistics, 206–228. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315299877‑11
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315299877-11 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2023 What really counts in nominal classification in Dagaare: A Mabia language. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=434709110.2139/ssrn.4347091
     https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4347091
  25. 2024 What is finiteness in Dagaare?Journal of World Languages. 10.1515/jwl‑2024‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2024-0010 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mwinlaaru, Isaac N., Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Ernest Akerejola
    2018 A system-based typology of mood in Niger-Congo languages, 93–117. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315392981‑6
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315392981-6 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mwinlaaru, Isaac N. & Foong Ha Yap
    2017 A tale of two distal demonstratives in Dagaare: Reflections on directionality principles in grammaticalisation. Language Sciences641. 130–151. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.07.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  28. Rialland, Annie
    2009 The African lax question prosody: Its realisation and geographical spread. Lingua1191. 928–949. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.014 [Google Scholar]
  29. Spronck, Stef & Tatiana Nikitina
    2019 Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology23(1). 119–159. 10.1515/lingty‑2019‑0005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0005 [Google Scholar]
  30. Stanley, Carol
    1982 Direct and reported speech in Tihar narrative texts. Studies in African Linguistics13(1). 31–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Xuan, W. Winfred & Shukun Chen
    2020 Taking stock of accumulated knowledge in projection studies from systemic functional linguistics: A research synthesis. Functional Linguistics7(1). 1–19. 10.1186/s40554‑019‑0070‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-019-0070-7 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.23011.mwi
Loading
projection in Dagaare
Language, Context and Text 7, 42 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.23011.mwi
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.23011.mwi
/content/journals/10.1075/langct.23011.mwi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Dagaare; evidentiality; logico-semantic relations; Mabia; mood; process types; projection; reported discourse; systemic functional linguistics

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error