The senator’s discriminatory intent

References

1. Baugh, J.
   (2018) Linguistics in pursuit of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316597750
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316597750 [Google Scholar]
2. Berg, C. R.
   (2002) Latino images in film. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blee, K. M.
   (2005) Racial violence in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies28(4), 599–619. 10.1080/01419870500092423
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870500092423 [Google Scholar]
4. Blumstein, J. F.
   (1983) Defining and proving race discrimination: Purpose vs. results approach from the Voting Rights Act. Virginia Law Review, 69(4), 633–714. 10.2307/1072904
   https://doi.org/10.2307/1072904 [Google Scholar]
5. Charteris-Black, J.
   (2006) Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(5), 563–581. 10.1177/0957926506066345
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506066345 [Google Scholar]
6. Díaz-Peralta, M.
   (2018) Metaphor and ideology: Conceptual structure and conceptual content in Spanish political discourse. Discourse & Communication, 12(2), 128–148. 10.1177/1750481317745752
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317745752 [Google Scholar]
7. Dirven, R.
   (1994) Metaphor and nation: Metaphors Afrikaners live by. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Frymer, P.
   (2005) Racism revised: Courts, labor law, and the institutional construction of racial animus. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 373–387. 10.1017/S0003055405051725
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051725 [Google Scholar]
9. Gans, J.
   (2008) Immigrants in Arizona: Fiscal and economic impacts. Tucson, AZ: Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gibbs, R.
    (2013) Why do some people dislike conceptual metaphor theory?Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2),15–36.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goatly, A.
    (2007) Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23 [Google Scholar]
12. Grady, J.
    (1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary stress. Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley dissertation.
13. Kobick, J.
    (2010) Discriminatory intent reconsidered: Folk concepts of intentionality and equal protection jurisprudence. Harvard Civil Rights-C.L.L. Review, 45, 517–562.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kövesces, Z.
    (2000) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kövesces, Z.
    (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
16. Krzyzanowski, M., & Wodak, R.
    (2011) The politics of exclusion: Debating migration in Austria. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lakoff, G.
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
18. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E.
    (2000) Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Landau, M. J., Robinson, M., & Meier, B.
    (Eds.) (2013) The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Musolff, A.
    (2004) Metaphor and political discourse. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230504516
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
23. Musolff, A.
    (2010) Metaphor, nation and the holocaust: The concept of the body politic. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203847282
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847282 [Google Scholar]
24. Otoole, M.
    (9September 2010) Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce discusses illegal immigration, SB 1070, and elections (Interview). LAND Latin America News Dispatch. latindispatch.com/2010/09/09/russell-pearce-discusses-illegal-immigration-sb-1070-and-elections-interview/ (1August 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pillai, K. G. J.
    (2001) Shrinking domain of invidious intent. William & Mary Bill Rights Journal, 9(3).
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pompa, Leon
    (1990) Vico: A study of the ‘New Science’ (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R.
    (2005) Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203993712
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993712 [Google Scholar]
28. Santa Ana, O.
    (1999) Like an animal I was treated: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 191–224. 10.1177/0957926599010002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002004 [Google Scholar]
29. Santa Ana, O.
    (2002) Brown tide rising: Metaphoric representations of Latinos in contemporary public discourse. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Santa Ana, O.
    (2004) When language plays proxy for race. Language Magazine: Journal of Communication & Education, 3(8), 15–17.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Santa Ana, O., López, L. & Munguía, E.
    (2010) Framing peace as violence: U.S. television news depictions of the 2007 Los Angeles police attack on immigrant rights marchers. Aztlán, 35(1), 69–101.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Santa Ana, O.
    (2013) Juan in a Hundred: Representation of Latinos on network news. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Santa Ana, O., Treviño, S. L., Bailey, M., Bodossian, K. & de Necochea, A.
    (2007) A May to remember: Adversarial images of immigrants in U.S. newspapers during the 2006 policy debate. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 4(1), 207–232. 10.1017/S1742058X07070117
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X07070117 [Google Scholar]
34. Santa Ana, O., Juárez, M., Reséndez, M., Hernández, J., Gaytán, O., Cerón, K., Gómez, C. & Hirose, Y.
    (under review). The President’s verbal animus against immigrants.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Said, E.
    (1987) Orientalism. New York, NY: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Searle, J. R.
    (1992) The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Selmi, M.
    (1997) Proving intentional discrimination: The reality of Supreme Court rhetoric. Georgetown Law Journal, 86, 279–350.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Steen, G.
    (2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 213–241. 10.1080/10926480802426753
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753 [Google Scholar]
39. Steen, G.
    (2014) The cognitive-linguistic revolution in metaphor studies. InJ. Taylor & J. Littlemore (Eds.), Companion to cognitive linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
41. van Dijk, T. A.
    (1987) Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
42. van Dijk, T. A.
    (1991) Racism and the press. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. van Dijk, T. A.
    (1993) Elite discourse and racism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781483326184
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326184 [Google Scholar]
44. van Leeuwen, T.
    (2009) Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice: A guide. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2, 144–161.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wetherell, M., & Potter, J.
    (1992) Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Winter, S. L.
    (1988) The metaphor of ‘standing’ and the problem of self-governance. Stanford University Law Review, 40, 1371–1516. 10.2307/1228780
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1228780 [Google Scholar]
47. Winter, S. L.
    (1989) Transcendental nonsense, metaphoric reasoning, and the cognitive strikes law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 137, 1105–1237. 10.2307/3312131
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3312131 [Google Scholar]
48. Winter, S. L.
    (1990) Bull Durham and the uses of theory. Stanford University Law Review, 42, 639–93. 10.2307/1228888
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1228888 [Google Scholar]
49. Wodak, R.
    (2008) ‘Us’ and ‘them’: Inclusion/exclusion – Discrimination via discourse. InG. Delanty, P. Jones, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Migration, identity, and belonging (pp.54–78). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. 10.5949/liverpool/9781846311185.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.5949/liverpool/9781846311185.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
50. Wodak, R., & Reisigl, M.
    (2003) Discourse and racism. InD. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp.372–397). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Zinn, H.
    (21October 2005) Don’t despair about the Supreme Court. The Progressive. https://progressive.org/op-eds/howard-zinn-despair-supreme-court (7October 2018).
    [Google Scholar]