Through the looking glass

References

1. Barton, G. A.
   (2002) Empire forestry and the origins of environmentalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511493621
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493621 [Google Scholar]
2. Blanc, G., Demeulenaere, E., & Feuerhahn, W.
   (Eds.) (2017) Humanités environnementales: Enquêtes et contre-enquêtes. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blaser, M.
   (2016) Is another cosmopolitics possible?Cultural Anthropology, 31(4), 545–570. 10.14506/ca31.4.05
   https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.05 [Google Scholar]
4. Bonneuil, C.
   (2017) Capitalocène: Réflexions sur l’échange écologique inégal et le crime climatique à l’âge de l’Anthropocène. EcoRev’, 44(2017/1), 52–60. 10.3917/ecorev.044.0052
   https://doi.org/10.3917/ecorev.044.0052 [Google Scholar]
5. Bonneuil, C., & Fressoz, J.-B.
   (2016) The shock of the Anthropocene: The earth, history and us. London: Verso.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Certeau, M. de, Julia, D., & Revel, J.
   (1975) Une politique de la langue. Paris: Gallimard Folio.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chappey, J.-L., & Vincent, J.
   (2019) A republican ecology? Citizenship, nature and the French revolution (1795–1799). Past & Present, 243(1), 109–140. doi:  10.1093/pastj/gtz003
   https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtz003 [Google Scholar]
8. Fressoz, J.-B., Graber, F., Locher, F., & Quenet, G.
   (2014) Introduction à l’histoire environnementale. Paris: La Découverte.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Haraway, D.
   (2016) Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822373780
   https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780 [Google Scholar]
10. Hauck, J. D.
    (2018) The origin of language among the Aché. Language & Communication, 63, 76–88. doi:  10.1016/j.langcom.2018.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.03.004 [Google Scholar]
11. Hobsbawm, E. J.
    (1996) Ethnicity and nationalism in Europe today. InG. Balakrishnan (Ed.), Mapping the nation (pp.255–266). London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Holbraad, M., & Pedersen, M. A.
    (2017) The ontological turn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316218907
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316218907 [Google Scholar]
13. Kohn, E.
    (2013) How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 10.1525/california/9780520276109.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520276109.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Latour, B.
    (2010) An attempt at a “compositionist manifesto”. New Literary History, 41(3), 471–490.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lévi-Strauss, C.
    (1951) Language and the analysis of social laws. American Anthropologist, 53(2), 155–163. doi:  10.1525/aa.1951.53.2.02a00010
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1951.53.2.02a00010 [Google Scholar]
16. Luisetti, F.
    (2019) Geopower: On the states of nature of late capitalism. European Journal of Social Theory, 22(3), 342–363. doi:  10.1177/1368431018803764
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018803764 [Google Scholar]
17. Mitchell, L.
    (2006) Making the local foreign: Shared language and history in southern India. Journal of Linguistic Anthopology, 16(2), 229–248. 10.1525/jlin.2006.16.2.229
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2006.16.2.229 [Google Scholar]
18. Pastoureau, M.
    (2004) Une histoire symbolique du Moyen Âge occidental. Paris: Points Histoire.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Shebitz, D. J., & Kimmerer, R. W.
    (2005) Reestablishing roots of a Mohawk community and a culturally significant plant: Sweetgrass. Restoration Ecology, 13(2), 257–264. doi:  10.1111/j.1526‑100X.2005.00033.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00033.x [Google Scholar]
20. Steuckardt, A.
    (2011) L’institution du français “révolutionné”: Construction du sujet de la langue dans le Dictionnaire national et anecdotique (1790). InS. Branca-Rosoff, J.-M. Fournier, Y. Grinshpun, & A. Régent-Susini (Eds.), Langue commune et changements de norme (pp.375–387). Paris: Honoré Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Taylor, A.-C.
    (1993) Des Fantômes stupéfiants: Langage et croyance dans la pensée achuar. L’Homme, 33(126), 429–447. doi:  10.3406/hom.1993.369648
    https://doi.org/10.3406/hom.1993.369648 [Google Scholar]
22. Toulmin, S. E.
    (1990) Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]