1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language, Culture and Society
  4. Volume 5, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2543-3164
  • E-ISSN: 2543-3156
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This article examines three sets of infrastructures that give shape to the academic knowledge economy, namely: institutional infrastructures (universities and conferences); gate-keeping infrastructures (journals and publishers); and validation infrastructures (competitive assessments of individuals and institutions). We analyse the tensed interplay between critical perspectives in applied linguistics and the influence of academic neoliberalism. We develop our argument in three parts: (1) Academic critique and its emancipatory epistemologies are intertwined with established systems and coexist with mechanisms that perpetuate inequalities. (2) Inequalities in knowledge production reverberate in knowledge dissemination, where the hegemonic role of English as the language of academic publishing reinforces the unequal position of different actors in their academic fields. (3) These inequalities (that originate in institutional and gate-keeping infrastructures) extend to the validation of knowledge, which is entrenched in the audit culture that pervades academia and further reinforces neoliberal competitive dynamics. We conclude by reflecting on the possibilities for change at these three levels.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lcs.00040.sol
2024-01-22
2025-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lcs.00040.sol
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lcs.00040.sol.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lcs.00040.sol&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Albuquerque, A. D.
    (2021) The institutional basis of anglophone western centrality. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1), 180–188. 10.1177/0163443720957893
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720957893 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amano, T., Ramírez-Castañeda, V., Berdejo-Espinola, V., Borokini, I., Chowdhury, S. & Golivets, M.
    (2023) The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science. PLoS Biology, 21(7), e3002184. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bacevic, J.
    (2019) Knowing neoliberalism. Social Epistemology, 33(4), 380–392. 10.1080/02691728.2019.1638990
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1638990 [Google Scholar]
  4. Besnier, N.
    (2019) From the editor: What I have learned in the last four years. American Ethnologist, 46(4), 381–386. 10.1111/amet.12834
     https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12834 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourdieu, P.
    (2021) Forms of capital: General sociology, volume 3: Lectures at the Collège de France 1983–84. Cambridge: Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brankovic, J.
    (2022) Why rankings appear natural (but aren’t). Business & Society, 61(4), 801–806. 10.1177/00076503211015638
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211015638 [Google Scholar]
  7. Canagarajah, S.
    (2022) Language diversity in academic writing: Toward decolonizing academic publishing. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17(2), 107–128. 10.1080/17447143.2022.2063873
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2022.2063873 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2002) A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjn6c
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjn6c [Google Scholar]
  9. Curcic, D.
    (2023, June1). Number of academic papers published per year. Wordsrated. https://wordsrated.com/number-of-academic-papers-published-per-year
     [Google Scholar]
  10. De Costa, P. I., Park, J., & Wee, L.
    (2019) Linguistic entrepreneurship as affective regime: Organizations, audit culture, and second/foreign language education policy. Language Policy, 181, 387–406. 10.1007/s10993‑018‑9492‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9492-4 [Google Scholar]
  11. De Figueiredo, E. H. D., & Martinez, J.
    (2021) The locus of enunciation as a way to confront epistemological racism and decolonize scholarly knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 42(2), 355–359. 10.1093/applin/amz061
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz061 [Google Scholar]
  12. Del Percio, A., Baquedano-López, P., Pérez-Milans, M. & Vigouroux, C.
    (Eds.) (2021) Language, epistemology, and the politics of knowledge production. Language, Culture and Society, 3(2), 1–5. 10.1075/lcs.00033.edi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00033.edi [Google Scholar]
  13. Deumert, A., & Makoni, S.
    (Eds.) (2023) From Southern theory to decolonising sociolinguistics: Voices, questions and alternatives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788926577
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788926577 [Google Scholar]
  14. Duchêne, A., Ellece, S. E., Tupas, R., Sabaté-Dalmau, M., Unamuno, V. & Urla, J.
    (Eds.) (2021) Prefiguring knowledge production in the sociology of language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 267–2681, 1–282. 10.1515/ijsl‑2021‑2121
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2021-2121 [Google Scholar]
  15. Flowerdew, J.
    (2019) The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality?Language Teaching, 53(2), 249–260. 10.1017/S0261444819000041
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000041 [Google Scholar]
  16. Harvey, D.
    (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Heng Hartse, J., & Kubota, R.
    (2014) Pluralizing English? Variation in high-stakes academic texts and challenges of copyediting. Journal of Second Language Writing, 241, 71–82. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.04.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Holborow, M.
    (2013) Applied linguistics in the neoliberal university: Ideological keywords and social agency. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 229–257. 10.1515/applirev‑2013‑0011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hyland, K.
    (2016) Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 311, 58–69. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2023) Academic publishing and the attention economy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 641, 101253. 10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101253
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101253 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hynninen, N., & Kuteeva, M.
    (2017) “Good” and “acceptable” English in L2 research writing: Ideals and realities in history and computer science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 301, 53–65. 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.009 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kerfoot, C., & Hyltenstam, K.
    (Eds.) (2017) Entangled discourses. South-North orders of visibility. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315640006
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315640006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kramsch, C.
    (2015) Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice. Applied linguistics, 36(4), 454–465. 10.1093/applin/amv039
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv039 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kubota, R.
    (2016) The multi/plural turn, postcolonial theory, and neoliberal multiculturalism: Complicities and implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 474–494. 10.1093/applin/amu045
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu045 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2020) Confronting epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and gender in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 712–732. 10.1093/applin/amz033
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz033 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2023) Linking research to transforming the real world: Critical language studies for the next 20 years. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 20(1), 4–19. 10.1080/15427587.2022.2159826
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2159826 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kubota, R., & Miller, E. R.
    (2017) Re-examining and re-envisioning criticality in language studies: Theories and praxis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2–3), 129–157. 10.1080/15427587.2017.1290500
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1290500 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kulczycki, E.
    (2023) The evaluation game: How publication metrics shape scholarly communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009351218
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009351218 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J.
    (2015) The politics of English, language and uptake. The case of international academic journal article reviews. AILA Review, 281, 127–150. 10.1075/aila.28.06lil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.06lil [Google Scholar]
  30. Martín Rojo, L.
    (2021) Hegemonies and inequalities in academia, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, (267–268), 169–192. 10.1515/ijsl‑2020‑0077
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0077 [Google Scholar]
  31. Matsuda, P. K., & Tardy, C.
    (2007) Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 261, 235–249. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. McCulloch, S.
    (2021) Establishing a track record in an age of precarity. InP. Habibie & S. Burgess (Eds.), scholarly publication trajectories of early-career scholars: Insider perspectives (pp.263–279). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑85784‑4_15
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85784-4_15 [Google Scholar]
  33. McCulloch, S., & Leonard, J.
    (2023) Hidden impacts of precarity on teaching: Effects on student support and feedback on academic writing. Teaching in Higher Education, 10.1080/13562517.2023.2280258
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2280258 [Google Scholar]
  34. Meghji, A.
    (2021) Decolonizing sociology: An introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Pardo-Guerra, J. P.
    (2022) The quantified scholar: How research evaluations transformed the British social sciences. New York: Columbia University Press. 10.7312/pard19780
     https://doi.org/10.7312/pard19780 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pennycook, A.
    (2022) Critical educational linguistics. Educational Linguistics, 1(2), 219–237. 10.1515/eduling‑2022‑0007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/eduling-2022-0007 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2021, 27October). Critical applied linguistics. Oxford Bibliographies. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199772810/obo-9780199772810-0280.xml. 10.4324/9781003090571
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003090571 [Google Scholar]
  38. Phelan, S.
    (2022) What’s in a name? Political antagonism and critiquing ‘neoliberalism’. Journal of Political Ideologies, 27(2), 148–167. 10.1080/13569317.2021.1871801
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2021.1871801 [Google Scholar]
  39. Piller, I.
    (2022) What exactly does an editor do?Multilingua, 41(6), 629–637. 10.1515/multi‑2022‑0125
     https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2022-0125 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmenk, B., Breidbach, S., & Küster, L.
    (Eds.) (2018) Sloganization in language education discourse: Conceptual thinking in the age of academic marketization. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Souto-Otero, M., & Enders, J.
    (2017) International students’ and employers’ use of rankings: A cross-national analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 783–810.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Spooner, M.
    (2020) Technologies of governance in context: Four global windows into neoliberalism and audit culture in higher education. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 743–747. 10.1177/1077800419878750
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419878750 [Google Scholar]
  43. Strathern, M.
    (Ed.) (2000) Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Walsh, P. W., & Lehmann, D.
    (2021) Academic celebrity. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 341, 21–46. 10.1007/s10767‑019‑09340‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-09340-9 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wee, L.
    (2016) Situating affect in linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 2(2), 105–126. 10.1075/ll.2.2.01wee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.2.2.01wee [Google Scholar]
  46. Willinsky, J.
    (2006) The access principle. The case for Open Access to research and scholarship. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lcs.00040.sol
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Academic knowledge economy; criticality; inequality; infrastructures; neoliberalism

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error