1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2543-3164
  • E-ISSN: 2543-3156
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Focusing on French social science and humanities journals, this article examines the digital communication surrounding the submission of articles by scholars based in Africa. Using Cameron’s concept of verbal hygiene ([1995] 2012), I analyze the case of negative reactions from editors triggered by stylistic and rhetorical features related to politeness. Through a detailed case study, the paper shows that such negative reactions involve semiotic processes of linguistic and social differentiation that articulate the moralized persona of the author and the scientific value of his/her work. However, editors’ verbal hygiene attitudes are also intertwined with political concerns aimed at promoting the inclusion of scholars from the Global South. In that context, the analysis reveals a complex interplay between the desire for openness and structural patterns of exclusion that enact long-standing hierarchies in knowledge production. Drawing on Inoue’s (2003) theory of the listening subject, I argue that this paradox arises from the reader’s particular position within the globalized academic landscape and from the power structures inherent in the circulation of texts between African and French academic contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lcs.00043.ver
2024-02-22
2025-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bahadoran, Z., Mirmiran, P., Kashfi, K., & Ghasemi, A.
    (2021) Scientific publishing in biomedicine: How to write a cover Letter?International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 19(3), e115242. 10.5812/ijem.115242
    https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.115242 [Google Scholar]
  2. Belcher, D. D.
    (2007) Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 1–22. 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blommaert, J., Muyllaert, N., Huysmans, M., & Dyers, C.
    (2005) Peripheral normativity: Literacy and the production of locality in a South African township school. Linguistics and Education, 16(4), 378–403. 10.1016/j.linged.2006.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourdieu, P.
    (1976) Le champ scientifique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 2(2–3), 88–104. 10.3406/arss.1976.3454
    https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1976.3454 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, D.
    ([1995] 2012) Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Canagarajah, A. S.
    (2002) A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjn6c
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjn6c [Google Scholar]
  7. Coetzee, C.
    (2018) Unsettling the air-conditioned room: Journal work as ethical labour. Journal of the African Literature Association, 12(2), 101–115. 10.1080/21674736.2018.1501979
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21674736.2018.1501979 [Google Scholar]
  8. Flowerdew, J.
    (2001) Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 121–150. 10.2307/3587862
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587862 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gal, S., & Irvine, J. T.
    (2019) Signs of difference: Language and ideology in social life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108649209
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649209 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gueye, A.
    (2002) Dark side of the African brain drain: Experiences of Africans holding doctoral degrees in social sciences and humanities living in France. African Issues, 30(1), 62–65. 10.2307/1167093
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1167093 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2019) Plutôt union libre que séparation. Les chercheurs africains francophones et l’Université française dans le contexte de réarrangement global du champ académique par les États-Unis. Histoire de la Recherche Contemporaine. La Revue du Comité pour l’Histoire du CNRS, 8(2), 160–179. 10.4000/hrc.3559
    https://doi.org/10.4000/hrc.3559 [Google Scholar]
  12. Heng Hartse, J., & Kubota, R.
    (2014) Pluralizing English? Variation in high-stakes academic texts and challenges of copyediting. Journal of Second Language Writing, 241, 71–82. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hountondji, P. J.
    (2001) Le savoir mondialisé : Déséquilibres et enjeux actuels. La Mondialisation vue d’Afrique. Université de Nantes/Maison des Sciences de l’Homme Guépin, Nantes, at : mshafrique.free.fr/afrique/charpar/cfpaulin.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hymes, D. H.
    (1996) Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Inoue, M.
    (2003) The listening subject of Japanese modernity and his auditory double: Citing, sighting, and siting the modern Japanese woman. Cultural Anthropology, 18(2), 156–193. 10.1525/can.2003.18.2.156
    https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2003.18.2.156 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kandiah, T.
    (2005) Academic writing and global inequality: Resistance, betrayal and responsibility in scholarship. Language in Society, 34(1), 117–132. 10.1017/S0047404505050050
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050050 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lawrance, B.
    (2020) Structural racism, whiteness, and the African Studies Review. African Studies Review, 63(3), 443–448. 10.1017/asr.2020.84
    https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2020.84 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J.
    (2010) Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Merton, R. K.
    (1973) The normative structure of science. InN. W. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp.267–278). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nature
    Nature (2021) Editorial: Tackling systemic racism requires the system of science to change. Nature, 593(7859), 313. 10.1038/d41586‑021‑01312‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01312-4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Piller, I., Zhang, J., & Li, J.
    (2022) Peripheral multilingual scholars confronting epistemic exclusion in global academic knowledge production: A positive case study. Multilingua, 41(6), 639–662. 10.1515/multi‑2022‑0034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2022-0034 [Google Scholar]
  22. Quashie, H.
    (2019) L’expatriation de la recherche française en Afrique subsaharienne : Distinctions raciales et épistémologies scientifiques (Sénégal, Madagascar, Bénin). Histoire de la Recherche contemporaine. La Revue du Comité pour l’Histoire du CNRS, 8(2), 208–229. 10.4000/hrc.3717
    https://doi.org/10.4000/hrc.3717 [Google Scholar]
  23. Rosa, J.
    (2019) Looking like a language, sounding like a race: Raciolinguistic ideologies and the learning of Latinidad. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190634728.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190634728.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Swales, J. M.
    (1996) Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. InE. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp.45–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.41.06swa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.41.06swa [Google Scholar]
  25. Van den Avenne, C.
    (2017) De la bouche même des indigènes: Échanges linguistiques en Afrique coloniale. Paris: Vendémiaire.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Vigouroux, C. B.
    (2017) The discursive pathway of two centuries of raciolinguistic stereotyping: ‘Africans as incapable of speaking French.’ Language in Society, 46(1), 5–21. 10.1017/S0047404516000804
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516000804 [Google Scholar]
  27. Weth, C., & Juffermans, K.
    (Eds.) (2018) Tyranny of writing: Ideologies of the written word. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lcs.00043.ver
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error