Manufacturing Academic Knowledge

References

1. Besnier, N.
   (2019) From the editor. What I have learned in the last four years. American Ethnologist, 46(4), 381–386. 10.1111/amet.12834
   https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12834 [Google Scholar]
2. Bourdieu, P.
   (1975) La spécificité du champ scientifique et les conditions sociales du progrès de la raison. Sociologie et Sociétés, 7(1), 91–118. 10.7202/001089ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/001089ar [Google Scholar]
3. Chalmers, B. & Solomon, B.
   (2022) Academic exploitation. The Lancet400/103471 (Special Issue).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cusicanqui, Silvia Rivera
   (2012) Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(1): 95–109. 10.1215/00382876‑1472612
   https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1472612 [Google Scholar]
5. Duchêne, A., Ellece, S. E., Tupas, R., Sabaté-Dalmau, M., Unamuno, V. & Urla, J.
   (2021) Welcome on board! Prefiguring knowledge production in the sociology of language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 267–2681: 3–8. 10.1515/ijsl‑2021‑2121
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2021-2121 [Google Scholar]
6. Fyfe, A., Moxham, N., McDougall-Waters, J. & Mørk Røstvik, C.
   (2022) A history of scientific journals. London: UCL Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Habibie, P. & Hultgren, A. K.
   eds. (2022) The inner world of gatekeeping in scholarly publication. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑06519‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06519-4 [Google Scholar]
8. Kronick, D. A.
   (1990) Peer review in 18th-Century scientific journalism. JAMA, 263(10), 1321–1322. 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100021002
   https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440100021002 [Google Scholar]
9. Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R.
   (2019) The journal impact factor: A Brief history, critique, and discussion of adverse effects. InGlänzel, W., Moed, H. F., Schmoch, U. & Thelwall, M. (eds) Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators, pp.3–24. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑02511‑3_1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_1 [Google Scholar]
10. LCS Team
    LCS Team (2021) Editorial: Language, epistemology, and the politics of knowledge production. Language, Culture and Society3(2), 143–153. 10.1075/lcs.00033.edi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00033.edi [Google Scholar]
11. Rampton, B., Bock, Z., Borba, R., Charalambous, C., Cooke, M. & Pérez-Milans, M.
    (2023) Working papers for a more open academy. Working Papers in Urban Language & LiteraciesPaper 318. https://wpull.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/WP318-Rampton-Bock-Borba-Charalambous-Cooke-Perez-Milans-2023-WPs-for-a-more-open-academy.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
12. Shearson, C.
    (2013) Evolution of the standard article. Science Editor36(3).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Shore, C. & Wright, S.
    (2015) Audit culture revisited: Rankings, ratings and the reassembling of society. Current Anthropology, 56(3), 421–444. 10.1086/681534
    https://doi.org/10.1086/681534 [Google Scholar]
14. Vittu, J.
    (2005) Du Journal des savants aux Mémoires pour l’histoire des sciences et des beaux-arts: L’esquisse d’un système européen des périodiques savants. Dix-septième siècle, 2281, 527–545. 10.3917/dss.053.0527
    https://doi.org/10.3917/dss.053.0527 [Google Scholar]
15. Waquet, F.
    (2022) L’ordre matériel du savoir. Comment les savants travaillent, XVIe–XXIe siècle. Paris: Biblis.
    [Google Scholar]