f Editorial

References

1. Baran, D.
   (2023) Defending Christianity from the ‘rainbow plague’: Historicised narratives of nationhood in the anti-genderism register in Poland. Gender & Language, 17(1).
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bauman, Z.
   (1997) Postmodernity and its discontents. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brant, Li
   (2023) What is decolonization? What is indigenization?Kingston: Queens University.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Borba, R.
   (2022) Enregistering “gender ideology” The emergence and circulation of a transnational anti-gender language. Journal of Language and Sexuality11(1), 57–79. 10.1075/jls.21003.bor
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.21003.bor [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, R., & A. Gilman
   (1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Butler, J.
   (2012) Precarious life, vulnerability, and the ethics of cohabitation. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy26(2), 134–151. 10.5325/jspecphil.26.2.0134
   https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.26.2.0134 [Google Scholar]
7. Cusicanqui, S. R.
   (2019) Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization. Language, Culture and Society1(1), 106–119. 10.1075/lcs.00006.riv
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00006.riv [Google Scholar]
8. Debord, G.
   (1967) La société du spectacle. Paris: Les éditions Buchet-Chastel.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Duchêne, A., M. Moyer, C. Roberts
   (2013) Language, migration and social inequalities: A critical sociolinguistic perspective on institutions and work. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783091010
   https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783091010 [Google Scholar]
10. Ferrarese, E.
    (Ed.) (2017) The politics of vulnerability. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315180519
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180519 [Google Scholar]
11. Haraway, D.
    (1988) Situated Knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3), 575–599. 10.2307/3178066
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066 [Google Scholar]
12. Legault, G., & D. Bleau
    (2025) Indigenizing or appropriating? Navigating the boundaries of institutional decolonization. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 1–21. 10.1080/10455752.2024.2445586
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2024.2445586 [Google Scholar]
13. McElhinny, B.
    (2016) Reparations and racism, discourse and diversity: Neoliberal multiculturalism and the Canadian age of apologies. Language & Communication511, 50–68. 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.07.003 [Google Scholar]
14. Ortner, S. B.
    (1995) Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History37(1), 173–193. 10.1017/S0010417500019587
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500019587 [Google Scholar]
15. Simpson, A.
    (2014) Mohawk interruptus: Political life across the borders of settler states. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Smith, L. T.
    (2012) Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. 2nd ed.London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Academic & Professional.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Tebaldi, C., & R. Jereza
    (2024) Ethnographic empathy and research ethics as methodological whiteness. InThe ethics of researching the far right, A. Vaughan, J. Braune, M. Tinsley and A. Mondon (eds) (pp.106–120). Manchester University Press. 10.7765/9781526173898.00016
    https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526173898.00016 [Google Scholar]
18. Tuck, and K. W. Yang
    (2012) Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society1(1), 1–40.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Vigouroux, C. B.
    (2019) Language and (in)hospitality: The micropolitics of hosting and guesting. Language, Culture and Society1(1), 31-58.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Vigouroux, C. B.
    (In press). Epilogue. InDecolonial options in Higher Education: Cracks and Fissures. S. Makoni and C. van der Merwe eds Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]