Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2543-3164
  • E-ISSN: 2543-3156
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Focusing on fansubbing, the production of unauthorized subtitles by fans of audiovisual media content, this paper calls for a more serious sociolinguistic analysis of the political economy of digital media communication. It argues that fansubbing’s contentious position within regimes of intellectual property and copyright makes it a useful context for considering the crucial role of language ideology in global capitalism’s expanding reach over communicative activity. Through a critical analysis of Korean discourses about fansubbing, this paper considers how tensions between competing ideological conceptions of fansub work shed light on the process by which regimes of intellectual property incorporate digital media communication as a site for profit. Based on this analysis, the paper argues for the need to look beyond the affordances of digital media in terms of translingual, hybrid, and creative linguistic form, to extend our investigations towards language ideologies as a constitutive element in the political economy.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Agha, A.
    (2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed, S.
    (2014) The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Appadurai, A.
    (1986) Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. InA. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp.3–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511819582.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819582.003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barton, D., & Lee, C.
    (2013) Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. Milton Park: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203552308
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203552308 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L.
    (2003) Voices of modernity: Language ideologies and the politics of inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486647
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486647 [Google Scholar]
  6. Block, D.
    (2013) Social class in applied linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315871141
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315871141 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blommaert, J.
    (2018) Durkheim and the Internet: On sociolinguistics and the sociological imagination. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyle, J.
    (1996) Shamans, software, and spleens: Law and the construction of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2008) The public domain: Enclosing the commons of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Callahan, M.
    (2017) I am because I own vs. I am because we are. InM. Callahan & J. Rogers (Eds.), A critical guide to intellectual property (pp.70–95). London: Zed Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cameron, D.
    (2005) Communication and commodification: Global economic change in sociolinguistic perspective. InG. Erreygers (Ed.), Language, communication and the economy (pp.9–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.16.04cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.16.04cam [Google Scholar]
  12. Condry, I.
    (2010) Dark energy: What fansubs reveal about the copyright wars. Mechademia, 5, 193–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Coombe, R. J.
    (1998) The cultural life of intellectual properties: Authorship, appropriation, and the law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822382492
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822382492 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dailey-O’Cain, J.
    (2017) Trans-national English in social media communities. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑50615‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50615-3 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dent, A.
    (2010) Flouting the Elmo necessity and denying the local roots of interpretation: “Anthropology’s” quarrel with ACTA and authoritarian IP regimes (PIJIP Research Paper no.3). Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2012) Introduction: Understanding the war on piracy, or why we need more anthropology of pirates. Anthropological Quarterly, 85(3), 659–672. doi:  10.1353/anq.2012.0040
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2012.0040 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deumert, A.
    (2014) Sociolinguistics and mobile communication. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dovchin, S., Sultana, S., & Pennycook, A.
    (2015) Relocalizing the translingual practices of young adults in Mongolia and Bangladesh. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts, 1(1), 4–26. 10.1075/ttmc.1.1.01dov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.1.1.01dov [Google Scholar]
  19. Dwyer, T.
    (2012) Fansub dreaming on ViKi: “Don’t just watch but help when you are free.” The Translator, 18(2), 217–243. 10.1080/13556509.2012.10799509
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2012.10799509 [Google Scholar]
  20. Errington, J.
    (2001) Ideology. InA. Duranti (Ed.), Key terms in language and culture (pp.110–112). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Flew, T.
    (2014) New media: An introduction (4th ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fuchs, C.
    (2011) Foundations of critical media and information studies. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203830864
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830864 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gal, S.
    (2015) Politics of translation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44(1), 225–240. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102214‑013806
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013806 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gramling, D.
    (2016) The invention of monolingualism. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Heller, M.
    (2010) The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 101–114. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951 [Google Scholar]
  26. Herring, S. C.
    (2003) Gender and power in on-line communication. InJ. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp.202–228). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756942.ch9
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch9 [Google Scholar]
  27. Holborow, M.
    (2015) Language and neoliberalism. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315718163
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718163 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2018) Language, commodification and labour: The relevance of Marx. Language Sciences, 70, 58–67. 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Inoue, M.
    (2011) Stenography and ventriloquism in late nineteenth century Japan. Language & Communication, 31(3), 181–190. 10.1016/j.langcom.2011.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2011.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Intellectual Property Office
    Intellectual Property Office (2015) International comparison of approaches to online copyright infringement: Final report. Newport: Intellectual Property Office.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Itō, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, danah, Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., … Tripp, L.
    (2010) Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Jenkins, H.
    (1992) Textual poachers: Television fans & participatory culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kapczynski, A.
    (2010) Access to knowledge: A conceptual genealogy. InG. Krikorian & A. Kapczynski (Eds.), Access to knowledge in the age of intellectual property (pp.17–56). New York: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, H.
    (2011) Participatory media fandom: A case study of anime fansubbing. Media, Culture & Society, 33(8), 1131–1147. 10.1177/0163443711418271
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711418271 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lobato, R., & Thomas, J.
    (2015) The informal media economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. McElhinny, B.
    (2010) The audacity of affect: Gender, race, and history in linguistic accounts of legitimacy and belonging. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 309–328. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑091908‑164358
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164358 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mosco, V.
    (2009) The political economy of communication (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781446279946
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279946 [Google Scholar]
  39. Park, J. S.
    (to appear). Translating culture in the global workplace: Language, communication, and diversity management. Applied Linguistics. doi:  10.1093/applin/amz019
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz019 [Google Scholar]
  40. Park, J. S., & Bucholtz, M.
    (2009) Introduction: Public transcripts: Entextualization and linguistic representation in institutional contexts. Text & Talk, 29(5), 485–502. 10.1515/TEXT.2009.026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.026 [Google Scholar]
  41. Park, J. S., & Wee, L.
    (2012) Markets of English: Linguistic capital and language policy in a globalizing world. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Pérez-González, L.
    (2012) Amateur subtitling and the pragmatics of spectatorial subjectivity. Language and Intercultural Communication, 12(4), 335–352. 10.1080/14708477.2012.722100
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2012.722100 [Google Scholar]
  43. Polanyi, K.
    (1944) The Great Transformation. New York, NY: Rinehart & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Prinsloo, M., & Rowsell, J.
    (2012) Digital literacies as placed resources in the globalised periphery. Language and Education, 26(4), 271–277. 10.1080/09500782.2012.691511
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.691511 [Google Scholar]
  45. Rembert-Lang, L. D.
    (2010) Reinforcing the tower of Babel: The impact of copyright law on fansubbing. Intellectual Property Brief, 2(2), 21–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Richard, A., & Rudnyckyj, D.
    (2009) Economies of affect. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15(1), 57–77. 10.1111/j.1467‑9655.2008.01530.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.01530.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Schieffelin, B. B., Woolard, K. A., & Kroskrity, P. V.
    (Eds.) (1998) Language ideologies: Practice and theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sharma, B. K.
    (2012) Beyond social networking: Performing global Englishes in Facebook by college youth in Nepal. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(4), 483–509. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2012.00544.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2012.00544.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Silverstein, M., & Urban, G.
    (Eds.) (1996) Natural histories of discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Simpson, W., & O’Regan, J. P.
    (2018) Fetishism and the language commodity: A materialist critique. Language Sciences, 70, 155–166. 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  51. Terranova, T.
    (2000) Free labor: Producing culture in the digital economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58. 10.1215/01642472‑18‑2_63‑33
    https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33 [Google Scholar]
  52. Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K.
    (Eds.) (2011) Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Weiner, A.
    (1992) Inalienable possessions: The paradox of keeping-while-giving. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 10.1525/california/9780520076037.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520076037.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error