1887
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2543-3164
  • E-ISSN: 2543-3156
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The hegemonic production of knowledge on (im)migration from the geopolitical and epistemic location of the United States has made legible and knowable a particular conception of (im)migration shaping in turn how (im)migrant subjects are made and remade. As a corpus these dominant conceptions of (im)migration are legible through a dominant discourse that has, in the particular case of the U.S., contributed to a racialized (im)migrant personhood and to the study of . In a two-pronged approach the piece (a) shows the settler colonial logics embedded in (im)migration discourse while (b) simultaneously enacting work of (re)imagining by putting in conversation the work on discourse and racialization within the contexts of (im)migration with Indigenous scholars’ work on borders, settlement, and sovereignty. As such the goals are to disrupt the naturalized ways whereby the racialized (im)migrant and (im)migration are conceptualized within the U.S. context and to offer an aperture for a (re)imagined posture on (im)migration. These initial and fragmentary dialogic exchanges offer a potential path towards a (re)imagined posture on (im)migration that does not reproduce settler colonial logics while sustaining the coexistence of antagonisms and tensions in our quotidian interactions needed to live with the discomfort of contradictions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lcs.20019.gav
2021-11-05
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alim, H. S., Reyes, A., & Kroskrity, P. V.
    (Eds.) (2020) The Oxford handbook of language and race. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190845995.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190845995.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alim, H. S., Rickford, J. R., & Ball, A. F.
    (Eds.) (2016) Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190625696.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190625696.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, B.
    (2006) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anzaldúa, G.
    (1987) Borderlands/La frontera: The new Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anzaldúa, G., & Moraga, C.
    (Eds.) (1981) This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (1st ed). Watertown: Persephone Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Appadurai, A.
    (1988) Putting hierarchy in its place. Cultural Anthropology, 3(1), 36–49. doi:  10.1525/can.1988.3.1.02a00040
    https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1988.3.1.02a00040 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L.
    (2003) Voices of modernity: Language ideologies and the politics of inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486647
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486647 [Google Scholar]
  8. Behar, R.
    (1993) Translated woman: Crossing the border with Esperanza’s story. Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Billig, M.
    (1995) Banal nationalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Blackwell, M., Boj Lopez, F., & Urrieta, L.
    (2017) Special issue: Critical Latinx Indigeneities. Latino Studies, 15(2), 126–137. doi:  10.1057/s41276‑017‑0064‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41276-017-0064-0 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bonilla-Silva, E.
    (2018) Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America (Fifth edition). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Byrd, J. A.
    (2011) The transit of empire: Indigenous critiques of colonialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816676408.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816676408.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cacho, L. M.
    (2012) Social death: Racialized rightlessness and the criminalization of the unprotected. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Calderon, D.
    (2014) Uncovering settler grammars in curriculum. Educational Studies, 50(4), 313–338. doi:  10.1080/00131946.2014.926904
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.926904 [Google Scholar]
  15. Calderón, H., & Saldívar, J.
    (Eds.) (1991) Criticism in the borderlands: Studies in Chicano literature, culture, and ideology. Durham: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822382355
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822382355 [Google Scholar]
  16. Carbado, D. W.
    (2005) Racial naturalization. American Quarterly, 57(3), 633–658. JSTOR. 10.1353/aq.2005.0042
    https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2005.0042 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Genova, N.
    (2002) Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 419–447. doi:  10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2005) Working the boundaries: Race, space, and “illegality” in Mexican Chicago. Durham: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822387091
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387091 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2013) ‘We are of the connections’: Migration, methodological nationalism, and ‘militant research.’ Postcolonial Studies, 16(3), 250–258. doi:  10.1080/13688790.2013.850043
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2013.850043 [Google Scholar]
  20. (Ed.) (2017) The borders of “Europe”: Autonomy of migration, tactics of bordering. Durham: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822372660
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372660 [Google Scholar]
  21. De Genova, N., & Peutz, N.
    (Eds.) (2010) The deportation regime: Sovereignty, space, and the freedom of movement. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Harris, C. I.
    (1993) Whiteness as Property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791. JSTOR. doi:  10.2307/1341787
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1341787 [Google Scholar]
  23. Definition of Incorporate
    Definition of Incorporate. (n.d.). InMerriam-Webster. RetrievedSeptember 19, 2020, fromhttps://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/incorporate
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Deloria, P. J.
    (1998) Playing Indian. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dick, H. P.
    (2011a) Language and migration to the United States. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 227–240. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑081309‑145634
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145634 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2011b) Making immigrants illegal in small-town USA. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 21(s1), E35–E55. doi:  10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2011.01096.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2011.01096.x [Google Scholar]
  27. (2018) Words of passage: National longing and the imagined lives of Mexican migrants (First edition). Austin: University of Texas Press. 10.7560/314012
    https://doi.org/10.7560/314012 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2020) Racializing discourses of illegality: Mexican & Central American migration in the time of trump. InH. S. Alim, A. Reyes, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), The oxford handbook of language and race (pp.447–471). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dick, H. P., & Wirtz, K.
    (2011) Racializing discourses. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 21(s1), E2–E10. doi:  10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2011.01094.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2011.01094.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Ellis, E.
    (2018) The border(s) crossed us too: The intersections of Native American and immigrant fights for justice. Expulsion, 14(1). https://hemisphericinstitute.org/en/emisferica-14-1-expulsion/14-1-essays/the-border-s-crossed-us-too-the-intersections-of-native-american-and-immigrant-fights-for-justice-2.html
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Flores, N., & Rosa, J.
    (2015) Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2). 10.17763/0017‑8055.85.2.149
    https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149 [Google Scholar]
  32. Flores, W. V., & Benmayor, R.
    (Eds.) (1997) Latino cultural citizenship: Claiming identity, space, and rights. Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Fujikane, C., & Okamura, J. Y.
    (Eds.) (2008) Asian settler colonialism: From local governance to the habits of everyday life in Hawai’i. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. 10.21313/hawaii/9780824830151.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824830151.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Glenn, E. N.
    (2002) Unequal freedom: How race and gender shaped American citizenship and labor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gonzalez, G. G.
    (2013) Chicano education in the era of segregation. Denton: UNT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Graziosi, G.
    (2020, February19). American high school textbook calls African slaves “immigrants.”The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/slavery-africa-school-textbook-immigrants-racism-education-a9345251.html
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Haney-López, I.
    (1996) White by law: The legal construction of race. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Heller, M., & McElhinny, B.
    (2017) Language, capitalism, colonialism: Toward a critical history. Tonawanda: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hill, J. H.
    (2008) The everyday language of white racism. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444304732
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304732 [Google Scholar]
  40. Isensee, L.
    (2015, October23). Why calling slaves “workers” is more than an editing error. NPR.Org. https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2015/10/23/450826208/why-calling-slaves-workers-is-more-than-an-editing-error
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Jung, M.-K.
    (2009) The racial unconscious of assimilation theory. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 6(2), 375–395. doi:  10.1017/S1742058X09990245
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X09990245 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kobayashi, A.
    (2003) The construction of geographical knowledge. InK. Anderson (Ed.), Handbook of cultural geography. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 10.4135/9781848608252.n40
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608252.n40 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kroskrity, P. V.
    (Ed.) (2000) Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities (1st ed). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press; Oxford: J. Currey.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Leonardo, Z.
    (2009) Race, whiteness, and education. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203880371
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880371 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lowe, L.
    (2015) The intimacies of four continents. Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lucero, J. A.
    (2014) “Friction, conversion, and contention: Prophetic politics in the Tohono O’odham borderlands.” Latin American Research Review, 49, 168–184. 10.1353/lar.2014.0055
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2014.0055 [Google Scholar]
  47. Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A.
    (Eds.) (2007) Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mills, C. W.
    (1997) The racial contract. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Moreton-Robinson, A.
    (2015) The White possessive: Property, power, and indigenous sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816692149.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816692149.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  50. (Ed.) (2016) Critical indigenous studies: Engagements in first world locations. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Morrison, T. [Google Scholar]
  52. Nevins, J.
    (2010) Operation gatekeeper and beyond: The war on “illegals” and the remaking of the U.S.-Mexico boundary (2nd ed). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203857731
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203857731 [Google Scholar]
  53. Ngai, M. M.
    (2004) Impossible subjects: Illegal aliens and the making of modern America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Nguyen, M. T.
    (2012) The gift of freedom: War, debt, and other refugee passages. Durham: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822391845
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391845 [Google Scholar]
  55. O’Brien, J. M.
    (2010) Firsting and lasting: Writing Indians out of existence in New England. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816665778.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816665778.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  56. Ong, A.
    (1999) Flexible citizenship: The cultural logics of transnationality. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W.
    (1921) Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Patel, L.
    (2016) Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Pateman, C.
    (1988) The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Pateman, C., & Mills, C. W.
    (2007) Contract and domination. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Paz, A. I.
    (2018) Latinos in Israel: Language and citizenship. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv75d88z
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv75d88z [Google Scholar]
  62. (2019) Communicating citizenship. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102317‑050031
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050031 [Google Scholar]
  63. Povinelli, E. A.
    (2011) Economies of abandonment: Social belonging and endurance in late liberalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Reyes, A.
    (2020) Coloniality of mixed race and mixed language. InH. S. Alim, A. Reyes, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), The oxford handbook of language and race (pp.186–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Rivera Cusicanqui, S.
    (2018) Un mundo ch’ixi es posible: Ensayos desde un presente en crisis. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Romero, M.
    (2008) Crossing the immigration and race border: A critical race theory approach to immigration studies. Contemporary Justice Review, 11(1), 23–37. doi:  10.1080/10282580701850371
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580701850371 [Google Scholar]
  67. Rosa, J.
    (2019) Looking like a language, sounding like a race: Raciolinguistic ideologies and the learning of Latinidad. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190634728.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190634728.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  68. Saldaña-Portillo, M. J.
    (2016) Indian given: Racial geographies across Mexico and the United States. Durham: Duke University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv11hpp7d
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hpp7d [Google Scholar]
  69. Saldívar, J. D.
    (1991) The dialectics of our America: Genealogy, cultural critique, and literary history. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Sanchez, G. J.
    (1984) “Go after the women”: Americanization and the Mexican immigrant woman, 1915–1929. Stanford Center for Chicano Research, Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Saranillio, D. I.
    (2013) Why Asian settler colonialism matters: A thought piece on critiques, debates, and Indigenous difference. Settler Colonial Studies, 3(3–04), 280–294. doi:  10.1080/2201473X.2013.810697
    https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2013.810697 [Google Scholar]
  72. Simpson, A.
    (2014) Mohawk interruptus: Political life across the borders of settler states. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Smalls, K. A.
    (2014) The proverbial monkey on our backs: Exploring the politics of belonging among transnational African high school students in the US. InJ. Koyama & M. Subramanian (Eds.), US education in a world of migration: Implications for policy and practice (pp.19–37). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Stephen, L.
    (2012) Towards a transborder perspective: U.S.-Mexico relations. Iberoamericana (2001-), 12(48), 85–99. JSTOR.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. The Combahee River Collective Statement
    The Combahee River Collective Statement. (n.d.). COMBAHEE RIVER COLLECTIVE. RetrievedMarch 2, 2021, fromcombaheerivercollective.weebly.com/the-combahee-river-collective-statement.html
  76. Tuck, E., & Gaztambide-Fernández, R. A.
    (2013) Curriculum, replacement, and settler futurity. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29(1), Article 1. https://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/411
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W.
    (2012) Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1). https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/18630
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Urciuoli, B.
    (2020) Racializing, ethnicizing, and diversity discourses: The forms may change but the pragmatics stay remarkably the same. InH. S. Alim, A. Reyes, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), The oxford handbook of language and race (pp.108–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Veracini, L.
    (2010) Settler colonialism: A theoretical overview. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9780230299191
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299191 [Google Scholar]
  80. Vimalassery, M., Pegues, J. H., & Goldstein, A.
    (2016) Introduction: On colonial unknowing. Theory & Event, 19(4). https://muse.jhu.edu/article/633283
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Walia, H.
    (2013) Undoing border imperialism. Edinburgh: AK Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Walzer, M.
    (1983) Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Webb, E.
    (2017, November11). [email protected] Center National Conversation: First Americans + New Americans. Arts in a Changing America. https://artsinachangingamerica.org/kennedy-6/
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Wimmer, A., & Schiller, N. G.
    (2002) Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334. doi:  10.1111/1471‑0374.00043
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00043 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lcs.20019.gav
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error