1887
image of Had the Neogrammarians spoken Wolof or Basaa…
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this response article to Emmanuel Ngué Um’s piece published in , I examine Ngué Um’s thesis that structural linguistics has no reality in the African context, which he presents in the form of a critique of Saussure and Western linguistics. Ngué Um imagines Saussure as a (native) speaker of an African language, who would have refrained from theorizing languages the way he did, namely as theoretical fictions, if only he had received a formation in linguistic anthropology. Against this, I argue that we must assess Saussurean thinking as part of the history of linguistics, i.e., in its proper historical context, and acknowledge that linguistics as we know it is the product of Western metaphysics. Saussure just carried forward the intellectual legacy of which he was a product. Ngué Um wishes to adapt Saussurean linguistics to the contemporary linguistic world and make it a fit for the postcolonial and posthuman paradigms. However, the notions of and have a precise function in Saussure’s theorizing, and it is questionable whether a linguistics should approach the African linguistic experience based on any of the Western metaphysical concepts. Doing so will, arguably, lead to a watered-down version of metaphysics and to a not fully emancipated southern linguistic theory.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lcs.21015.pab
2022-03-10
2022-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anward, J. & P. Linell
    (2016) On the grammar of utterances: Putting the form vs. substance distinction on its feet. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 48(1), 35–58. 10.1080/03740463.2016.1159819
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2016.1159819 [Google Scholar]
  2. Deumert, A., Storch, A., & Shepherd, N.
    (Eds.) (2020) Colonial and decolonial linguistics. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780198793205.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793205.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Engler, R. & Bouquet, S.
    (Eds.) (2002) Saussure F. de. Écrits de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Harris, R.
    (1980) The Language-makers. London: Duckworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1981) The Language myth. London: Duckworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1990/1998) The dialect myth. InR. Harris & G. Wolf. (Eds.), Integrational linguistics: A first reader (pp.83–95). Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1997) From an integrational point of view. InG. Wolf & N. Love. (Eds.), Linguistics inside out: Roy Harris and his Critics (pp.229–310). London: Routledge. 10.1075/cilt.148.16har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.148.16har [Google Scholar]
  8. (1998) Introduction to integrational linguistics. London: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2003) The necessity of artspeak. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2004) The linguistics of history. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2005) The semantics of science. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2006) Was Saussure an integrationist?. InL. Saussure de. (Ed.), Nouveaux regards sur Saussure (pp.209–217). Geneva: Droz.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2011) Language myths, east and west. Integrationist notes and papers 2009–2011. Gamlingay: Bright Pen.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kwok, S.
    (2020) Postcolonial translation theories and the language myth: An integrational perspective. Language Sciences, 80(3), 101286. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101286
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101286 [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, W.
    (2017) Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ngué Um, E.
    (2020) Had Ferdinand de Saussure spoken Wolof or Basaa…the discipline of linguistics would have fared differently. Language, Culture and Society, 2(1), 107–115. 10.1075/lcs.00022.ngu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00022.ngu [Google Scholar]
  17. Orman, J.
    (2013) New lingualisms, same old codes. Language Sciences37, 90–98. 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Pablé, A.
    (2021) Socio(historical) onomastics through the language-philosophical lens, with reference to early New England titles of civility. Nordic Journal of Socio-Onomastics, 1(1), 85–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pennycook, A.
    (2017) Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 269–282. 10.1080/14790718.2017.1315810
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315810 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2018) Posthumanist applied linguistics. Oxon & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pennycook, A. & S. Makoni
    (2019) Innovations and challenges in applied Linguistics from the Global South. Oxon & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429489396
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429489396 [Google Scholar]
  22. Sabino, R.
    (2021) Beyond IL: Languaging without languages. InS. Makoni, (Eds.), Integrational linguistics and philosophy of language in the Global South (pp.183–196). London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003088110‑11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003088110-11 [Google Scholar]
  23. Saussure, F. de
    (1916) Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lcs.21015.pab
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error