oa Epistemic authority, authenticity, and the Filipino conyo

References

1. Agha, A.
   (2002) “Epistemic stance.” Workshop presentation atthe 101st Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, November 20–24, 2002.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atkinson, D., & Kelly-Holmes, H.
   (2016) Exploring language attitudes and ideologies in university students’ discussion of Irish in a context of increasing language diversity. Language and Intercultural Communication, 16(2), 199–215. 10.1080/14708477.2015.1136317
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2015.1136317 [Google Scholar]
3. Blommaert, J.
   (2010) The sociolinguistics of globalization (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845307
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [Google Scholar]
4. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K.
   (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
5. Constantino, R.
   (1970) The mis-education of the Filipino. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 1(1), 20–36. 10.1080/00472337085390031
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00472337085390031 [Google Scholar]
6. Coupland, N.
   (2003) Sociolinguistic authenticities. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(3), 417–431. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00233
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00233 [Google Scholar]
7. Crystal, D.
   (2011) Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203830901
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830901 [Google Scholar]
8. Du Bois, J. W.
   (2002) “Stance and consequence.” Paper presented at theannual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Du Bois, J. W.
   (2007) The stance triangle. InR. Englebretson (Ed.), Pragmatics & beyond new series (Vol.1641, pp.139–182). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
10. Gal, S., & Irvine, J. T.
    (2019) Signs of difference: Language and ideology in social life (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108649209
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649209 [Google Scholar]
11. Gibson, A.
    (2019) Free speech and safe spaces: How moderation policies shape online discussion spaces. Social Media + Society, 5(1). 10.1177/2056305119832588
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119832588 [Google Scholar]
12. Hau, C. S., & Tinio, V. L.
    (2003) Language policy and ethnic relations in the Philippines. InM. E. Brown & Š. Ganguly (Eds.), Fighting words (pp.319–350). The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/2988.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2988.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
13. Heritage, J.
    (2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
14. Heritage, J.
    (2012b) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
15. Heritage, J., & Raymond, G.
    (2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
16. Hill, J. H.
    (2008) The everyday language of white racism (1st ed.). Wiley. 10.1002/9781444304732
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304732 [Google Scholar]
17. Ignacio, E. N.
    (2005) Building diaspora: Filipino community formation on the Internet. Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jacob, J.
    (2021) Meeting the lumpia Filipino: Self-Orientalism in Filipino America. [Undergraduate Honors Thesis, William & Mary University]. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1665/
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jaffe, A.
    (2000) Comic performance and the articulation of hybrid identity. Pragmatics, 10(1), 39–59. 10.1075/prag.10.1.02jaf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.1.02jaf [Google Scholar]
20. Jaffe, A.
    (2003) Misrecognition unmasked? ‘Polynomic’ language, expert statuses and orthographic practices in Corsican schools. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 515–537. 10.1075/prag.13.4.04jaf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.13.4.04jaf [Google Scholar]
21. Jaffe, A.
    (2009a) Entextualization, mediatization and authentication: Orthographic choice in media transcripts. Text & Talk — An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 29(5), 571–594. 10.1515/TEXT.2009.030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.030 [Google Scholar]
22. Jaffe, A.
    (2009b) Stance. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Jaffe, A.
    (2011) Sociolinguistic diversity in mainstream media: Authenticity, authority and processes of mediation and mediatization. Journal of Language and Politics, 10(4), 562–586. 10.1075/jlp.10.4.05jaf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.10.4.05jaf [Google Scholar]
24. Jaffe, A.
    (2013) Minority language learning and communicative competence: Models of identity and participation in Corsican adult language courses. Language & Communication, 33(4), 450. 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.04.002 [Google Scholar]
25. Kemp, S.
    (2024, February21). Digital 2024: The Philippines. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-philippines
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kiesling, S. F.
    (2022) Stance and stancetaking. Annual Review of Linguistics, 8(1), 409–426. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑031120‑121256
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-121256 [Google Scholar]
27. Kroskrity, P. V.
    (2022) Language ideologies and social identities. InS. Völkel & N. Nassenstein (Eds.), Approaches to Language and Culture (pp.101–126). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110726626‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110726626-005 [Google Scholar]
28. Liebscher, G., & Dailey-O’Cain, J.
    (2009) Language attitudes in interaction1. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(2), 195–222. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00404.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00404.x [Google Scholar]
29. Lo, A.
    (2022) Evidentiality and morality in a Korean heritage language school. Pragmatics, 14(2–3), 235–256. 10.1075/prag.14.2‑3.08lo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.14.2-3.08lo [Google Scholar]
30. Meredith, J.
    (2019) Conversation analysis and online interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 241–256. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1631040
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631040 [Google Scholar]
31. Noy, C., & Hamo, M.
    (2019) Stance-taking and participation framework in museum commenting platforms: On subjects, objects, authors, and principals. Language in Society, 48(2), 285–308. 10.1017/S0047404519000010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000010 [Google Scholar]
32. Osborne, D.
    (2018) “Ay, nosebleed!”: Negotiating the place of English in contemporary Philippine linguistic life. Language & Communication, 581, 118–133. 10.1016/j.langcom.2017.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2017.08.001 [Google Scholar]
33. Osborne, D.
    (2021) The making of “deep language” in the Philippines. Language, Culture and Society, 3(1), 58–81. 10.1075/lcs.20008.osb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.20008.osb [Google Scholar]
34. Pavlenko, A., & Blackledge, A.
    (2004) Introduction: New theoretical approaches to the study of negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. InA. Pavlenko & A. Blackledge (Eds.), Negotiation of Identities in Multilingual Contexts (pp.1–33). Multilingual Matters. 10.2307/jj.27710911.5
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.27710911.5 [Google Scholar]
35. Parba, J.
    (2018) Teachers’ shifting language ideologies and teaching practices in Philippine mother tongue classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 471, 27–35. 10.1016/j.linged.2018.07.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.07.005 [Google Scholar]
36. Pe-Pua, R., & Protacio-Marcelino, E. A.
    (2000) Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 49–71. 10.1111/1467‑839X.00054
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00054 [Google Scholar]
37. Raymond, G., & Heritage, J.
    (2006) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(05), 677–705. 10.1017/S0047404506060325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
38. Reyes, A.
    (2017a) Inventing postcolonial elites: race, language, mix, excess. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 27(2), 210–231. 10.1111/jola.12156
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12156 [Google Scholar]
39. Reyes, A.
    (2017b) Ontology of fake: Discerning the Philippine elite. Signs and Society, 5(S1), S100–S127. 10.1086/690067
    https://doi.org/10.1086/690067 [Google Scholar]
40. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H.
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4). 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
41. Sercombe, P., & Tupas, R.
    (2014) Language, education and nation-building: Assimilation and shift in Southeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sierra, S.
    (2023) The epistemics of authentication and denaturalization in the construction of identities in social interaction. Language in Society, 52(4), 571–594. 10.1017/S0047404522000161
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404522000161 [Google Scholar]
43. Telenor
    Telenor (2023) Telenor Asia digital lives decoded: Part three: play. https://www.telenor.com/stories/include/telenor-asia-digital-lives-decoded-play/
44. Tudini, V.
    (2015) Extending prior posts in dyadic online text chat. Discourse Processes, 52(8), 642–669. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.969138
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.969138 [Google Scholar]
45. Tupas, R.
    (2015) The politics of ‘p’ and ‘f’: A linguistic history of nation-building in the Philippines. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(6), 587–597. 10.1080/01434632.2014.979831
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2014.979831 [Google Scholar]
46. Wei, L.
    (2018) Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. 10.1093/applin/amx039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039 [Google Scholar]
47. Woolard, K. A.
    (1998) Simultaneity and bivalency as strategies in bilingualism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 8(1), 3–29. 10.1525/jlin.1998.8.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1998.8.1.3 [Google Scholar]
48. Woolard, K. A.
    (2005) Language and identity choice in Catalonia: The interplay of contrasting ideologies of linguistic authority. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/47n938cp
49. Woolard, K. A.
    (2007) Bystanders and the linguistic construction of identity in face-to-back communication. Language Power and Social Process, 181, 187. 10.1515/9783110198508.1.187
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198508.1.187 [Google Scholar]
50. Woolard, K. A.
    (2013) Is the personal political? Chronotopes and changing stances toward Catalan language and identity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(2), 210–224. 10.1080/13670050.2012.720670
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.720670 [Google Scholar]
51. Woolard, K. A.
    (2016) Singular and plural: Ideologies of linguistic authority in 21st century Catalonia. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190258610.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190258610.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
52. Woolard, K. A.
    (2018) Language, identity, and politics in Catalonia. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 25(1), 21–40.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Zorluel Özer, H.
    (2022) “You’ve gotta change your accent”: An online discourse community’s language ideologies on accentedness in higher education. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 16(2), 36–48.
    [Google Scholar]