The persuasive use of pronouns in action games of election campaigns

References

1. Billig, Michael
   1995 Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bramley, Nicolette Ruth
   2001 Pronouns of Politics: The Use of Pronouns in the Construction of ‘Self’ and ‘Other’ in Political Interviews. Australian National University, Unpublished PhD thesis, Available online atwww.openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/46225, Accessed onMarch 3, 2017.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bruneau, Thomas J.
   1973 “Communicative silences: forms and functions.” The Journal of Communication23: 17–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1973.tb00929.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1973.tb00929.x [Google Scholar]
4. Chilton, Paul and Christina Schäffner
   1997 “Discourse and politics.” InDiscourse as Social Interaction, vol.2, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk , 206–230. London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Duncker, Dorthe
   2011 “On the empirical challenge to integrational studies in language.” Language Sciences33 (4): 533–543. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.013 [Google Scholar]
6. Ephratt, Michal
   2008 “The functions of silence.” Journal of Pragmatics40: 1909–938. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.009 [Google Scholar]
7. Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak
   1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InDiscourse as Social Interaction, vol.2, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk , 258–284. London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull
   2008 “‘Well, I answer it by simply inviting you to look at the evidence’. The strategic use of pronouns in political interviews.” Journal of Language and Politics7(2): 271-289.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hall, Kira , Donna M. Goldstein and Matthew B. Ingram
   2016 “The hands of Donald Trump: Entertainment, gestures, spectacle.” Journal of Ethnographic Theory6(2): 71–100. doi: 10.14318/hau6.2.009.
   https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.2.009 [Google Scholar]
10. Harris, Roy
    1990 “The integrationist critique of orthodox linguistics.” InThe Sixteenth LACUS Forum 1989, ed. by M. P. Jordan , 63–77. Lake Bluff: LACUS.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Harris, Roy
    1993 “Integrational Linguistics.” InActes du XVe Congrès International des Linguistes, vol.1, ed. by A. Crochetière , J. -C. Boulanger , and C. Ouellon , 321–323. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université Laval.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Harris, Roy
    1998 Introduction to Integrational Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Harris, Roy
    2008 Mindboggling: Preliminaries to a Science of the Mind. London: Pantaneto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Harris, Roy
    2009 Integrationist Notes and Papers 2006–2008. Gamlingay: Bright Pen.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ilie, Cornelia
    2010 “Identity co-construction in parliamentary discourse practices.” InEuropean Parliaments under Scrutiny, ed. by Cornelia Ilie , 57–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.38.04ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.38.04ili [Google Scholar]
16. Jakobson, Roman
    1960 “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics.” inStyle in Language, ed. by Thomas Sebeok . New York and London: Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lakoff, George
    2016 “Understanding Trump.” Available online athttps://georgelakoff.com/2016/07/23/understanding-trump-2/. Accessed onOctober 6, 2017.
18. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger
    1991 Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
19. Lund, Søren
    2012 “On Professor Roy Harris’s ‘Integrational Turn’ in Linguistics.” RASK35(1): 3–42.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Neagu, Maria-Ionela
    2015 “Political debates: Deliberation, persuasion, and ethos construction.” InPersuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue, ed. by Răzvan Săftoiu , Maria Ionela-Neagu and Stanca Măda , 85–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.26.05nea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.26.05nea [Google Scholar]
21. Orman, Jon and Adrian Pablé
    2016 “Polylanguaging, integrational linguistics and contemporary sociolinguistic theory: a commentary on Ritzau.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism19(5): 592–602.10.1080/13670050.2015.1024606
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1024606 [Google Scholar]
22. Pablé, Adrian and Christopher Hutton
    2015 Signs, Meaning and Experience. Integrational Approaches to Linguistics and Semiotics. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Săftoiu, Răzvan
    2018 forth. “To speak or not to speak. Notes on silence as a dialogic speech act”. Revue Roumaine de LinguistiqueLXIII.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Schiappa, Edward
    2003 Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Sifianou, Maria
    1997 “Silence and Politeness.” InSilence: Interdisciplinary Perspectivesed. by Adam Jaworski , 63–84. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Searle, John R.
    1975 “Indirect speech acts.” InSyntax and Semantics, vol.3, ed. by Peter Cole , J. L. Morgan , 59–82. New York, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Weigand, Edda
    2003 “Dialogue Analysis 2000: Towards a human linguistics.” InDialogue Analysis 2000, ed. by Marina Bondi , 15–28. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110933253.15
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110933253.15 [Google Scholar]
28. Weigand, Edda
    2008 “The argumentative power of words or how to move people’s minds with words.” L’analisi Linguistica e LetterariaXVI: 73–92.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Weigand, Edda
    2009 Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
30. Weigand, Edda
    2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
31. Weigand, Edda
    2011a “Power in dialogic interaction.” Language and Dialogue1(2): 233–242. doi: 10.1075/ld.1.2.04wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.1.2.04wei [Google Scholar]
32. Weigand, Edda
    2011b “Paradigm changes in linguistics: From reductionism to holism.” Language Sciences33: 544–549. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.031
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.031 [Google Scholar]
33. Weigand, Edda
    2012 “Professional action games. Theory and practice.” InProfessional Communication across Languages and Cultures, ed. by Stanca Măda and Răzvan Săftoiu , 43–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.17.04wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.17.04wei [Google Scholar]
34. Weigand, Edda
    2015 “Persuasion or the integration of grammar and rhetoric.” InPersuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue, ed. by Răzvan Săftoiu , Maria Ionela-Neagu and Stanca Măda , 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.26.01wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.26.01wei [Google Scholar]
35. Wenger, Etienne
    1998 Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932 [Google Scholar]
36. Wilson, John
    1990 Politically Speaking. The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1953 Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1963 Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]