Blogs as interwoven polylogues

References

1. Aijmer, Karin
   2005 “ Just and Multifunctionality.” InContext-Historical, Social, Linguistic Studies in Celebration of Toril Swan, ed. by Kevin McCafferty , Tove Bull and Kristin Killie (eds), 31–47. Bern: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baron, Naomi
   2008 Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
3. Boardmann, Mark
   2005 The Language of Websites. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bondi, Marina
   2016 “Textbooks.” InThe Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes, ed. by Ken Hyland and Philip Shaw , 323–334. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bondi, Marina
   . forthcoming (a). “Dialogicity in Written Language Use: Variation across Expert Action Games.” InFrom Pragmatics to Dialogue ed. by Edda Weigand and Istvan Kovecses . Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bondi, Marina
   . forthcoming (b). “ Try to prove me wrong: Engaging Multiple Audiences in Blogs.” Discourse, Context and Media.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bondi, Marina
   2017 “Corpus Linguistics.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand , 46–61. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bondi, Marina and Corrado Seidenari
   2012 “ and now i’m finally of the mind to say i hope the whole ship goes down…: Markers of Subjectivity and Evaluative Phraseology in Blogs.” InCorpus Linguistics and Variation in English, ed. by Joybrato Mukherjee and Magnus Huber , 17–27. Amsterdam: Rodopi. doi: 10.1163/9789401207713_004
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207713_004 [Google Scholar]
9. Bondi, Marina and Giuliana Diani
   2015 “ I am wild about cabbage: Evaluative ‘Semantic Sequences’ and Cross-linguistic (Dis)continuities.” Nordic Journal of English Studies (NJES)14(1): 116–151.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Camarero, Jesús
    2011 Integrational semiology and epistemocentrism”. Language Sciences33. 662–666. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.009 [Google Scholar]
11. Craig, Robert and Alena Sanusi
    2000 “ I’m just saying: Discourse Markers of Standpoint Continuity.” Argumentation14: 425–445. doi: 10.1023/A:1007880826834
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007880826834 [Google Scholar]
12. Garzone, Giuliana , Gina Poncini and Paola Catenaccio
    (eds) 2007 Multimodality in Corporate Communication. Web Genres and Dicursive Identity. Milano: Franco Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gil-Salmon, Luz and Carmen Soler-Monreal
    2014 Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23 [Google Scholar]
14. Grieve, Jack , Douglas Biber , Eric Friginal and Tatiana Nekrasova
    2010 “Variation among Blogs: A Multi-dimensional Analysis.” InGenres on the Web, ed. by Alexander Mehler , Serge Sharoff and Marina Santini , 303–322. Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9178‑9_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9178-9_14 [Google Scholar]
15. Groom, Nicholas
    2010 “Closed-class Keywords and Corpus-driven Discourse Analysis.” InKeyness in Text, ed. By Marina Bondi and Michael Scott , 59–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.41.05gro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.41.05gro [Google Scholar]
16. Harris, Roy
    1986 The Origins of Writing. Duckworth: London.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Harris, Roy
    1989 “How does writing restructure thought?” Language and Communication9(2/3): 99–106. doi: 10.1016/0271‑5309(89)90012‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(89)90012-8 [Google Scholar]
18. Harris, Roy
    1998 Introduction to Integrational Linguistics. Oxford. Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Harris, Roy
    2000 Rethinking Writing. London: Athlone Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Herring, Susan , Dieter Stein and Tuija Virtanen
    (eds) 2013 Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214468
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468 [Google Scholar]
21. Herring, Susan , Lois Ann Scheidt , Elijah Wright and Sabrina Bonus
    2005 “Weblogs as a Bridging Genre.” Information Technology and People18(2): 142–171. doi: 10.1108/09593840510601513
    https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840510601513 [Google Scholar]
22. Hutton, Christopher , Adrian Pablé and David Bade
    2011 “Roy Harris and Integrational Linguistics”. Language Sciences33: 475–479. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.001 [Google Scholar]
23. Hutton, Christopher
    2011 “The politics of the language myth: reflections of the writings of Roy Harris”. Language Sciences33: 503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.005 [Google Scholar]
24. Krishnamurthy, Sandeep
    2002 “The Multidimensionality of Blog Conversations: The Virtual Enactment of September 11”, paper presented at theAssociation of Internet Researchers Conference 3.0, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kuteeva, M.
    2016 “Research Blogs, Wikis and Tweets.” InThe Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes, ed. by ken Hyland and Philip Shaw , 431–443. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Luzón, Maria José
    2011 “ Interesting Post, but I Disagree: Social Presence and Antisocial Behaviour in Academic Weblogs.” Applied Linguistics32(5): 517–540. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr021
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr021 [Google Scholar]
27. Luzón, Maria José
    2012 “ Your Argument is Wrong: A Contribution to the Study of Evaluation in Academic Weblogs.” Text and Talk32(2): 145–165.10.1515/text‑2012‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0008 [Google Scholar]
28. Luzón, Maria José
    2013 “Public Communication of Science in Blogs: Recontextualizing Scientific Discourse for a Diversified Audience.” Written Communication30(4): 428–457. doi: 10.1177/0741088313493610
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313493610 [Google Scholar]
29. Mauranen, Anna
    2013 “Hybridism, Edutainment, and Doubt: Science Blogging Finding its Feet.” Nordic Journal of English Studies13(1): 7–36.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Molina, Clara and Manuela Romano
    2012 “ Just Revisited: Panchronic and Contrastive Insights.” International Journal of English Studies12(1): 17–36. doi: 10.6018/ijes.12.1.118831
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.12.1.118831 [Google Scholar]
31. Myers, Greg
    2010 The Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Nevalainen, Terttu
    1991 But, Only, Just. Focusing Adverbial Change in Modern English: 1500–1900. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Puschmann, Cornelius
    2013 “Blogging.” InPragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan Herring , Dieter Stein and Tuija Virtanen , 83–108. Berlin: DeGruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214468.83
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.83 [Google Scholar]
34. Puschmann, Cornelius
    2015 “A Digital Mob in the Ivory Tower? Context Collapse in Scholarly Communication Online.” InDiscourse in and through the Media, ed. by Marina Bondi , Silvia Cacchiani and Davide Mazzi , 22–45. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Quiggin, John
    2011 “Economic Blogs.” Economic Papers30(4): 437–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1759‑3441.2011.00148.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.2011.00148.x [Google Scholar]
36. Schmidt, Jan
    2007 “Blogging Practices: An Analytical Framework.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1409–1427. doi: 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2007.00379.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00379.x [Google Scholar]
37. Scott, Michael
    2012 WordSmith Tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sen, Amartya
    1986 “Prediction and Economic Theory.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences407 (1832) (Predictability in Science and Society): 3–23. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1986.0080
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1986.0080 [Google Scholar]
39. Siles, Ignacio
    2011 “The Rise of Blogging: Articulation as a Dynamic of Technological Stabilization.” New Media and Society14(5): 781–797. doi: 10.1177/1461444811425222
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811425222 [Google Scholar]
40. Sinclair, John
    2004 Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Traugott, Elizabeth
    1988 “Is Internal Semantic-pragmatic Reconstruction Possible?” InRhetorica, Phonologica, Syntactica, ed. by Christine Brooke-Rose , Jacek Fisiak and Theo Vennemann , 128–144. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Warschauer, Mark and Douglas Grimes
    2007 “Audience, Authorship, and Artifact: The Emergent Semiotics of Web 2.0” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics27: 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0267190508070013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508070013 [Google Scholar]
43. Weigand, Edda
    2009 Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
44. Weigand, Edda
    2010 Dialogue: the Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
45. Weigand, Edda
    2016 “How to verify a theory of language.” Language and Dialogue6(3): 349–369.10.1075/ld.6.3.01wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.3.01wei [Google Scholar]
46. Yus, Francisco
    2015 “Interactions with Readers through Online Specialized Genres: Specificity or Adaptability?” InDialogicity in Written Specialised Genres, ed. by Luz Gil-Salmon and Carmen Soler-Monreal , 189–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Yus, Francisco
    2011 Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated Communication in Context. Benjamins: Amsterdam. doi: 10.1075/pbns.213
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]