Theorising the untheorisable

References

1. Davis, Daniel R.
   1997 “The three-dimensional sign.” Language Sciences19(1): 23–31. doi: 10.1016/0388‑0001(95)00024‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(95)00024-0 [Google Scholar]
2. Harris, Roy
   1990 “The integrationist critique of orthodox linguistics.” InThe Sixteenth LACUS Forum 198, ed. by M. P. Jordan , 63–77. Lake Bluff, IL: LACUS.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Harris, Roy
   1997 “From an integrational point of view.” InLinguistics Inside Out: Roy Harris and his Critics, ed. by George Wolf and Nigel Love , 229–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.148.16har
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.148.16har [Google Scholar]
4. Harris, Roy
   2000 Second Thoughts on Telementation. Unpublished manuscript.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Louch, A. R.
   1966 Explanation and Human Action. Oxford. Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Louch, A. R.
   1982 “What is Criticism?” Philosophy and Literature6(1–2): 190–195. doi: 10.1353/phl.1982.0029
   https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.1982.0029 [Google Scholar]
7. Love, Nigel
   1990 “The locus of languages in a redefined linguistics.” InRedefining Linguistics, ed. by Hayley G. Davis and Talbot J. Taylor , 53–117. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Orman, Jon
   2016 “Scientism in the language sciences.” Language and Communication48: 28–40.10.1016/j.langcom.2016.02.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.02.002 [Google Scholar]
9. Orman, Jon
   2017a “ Indeterminacy in sociolinguistic and integrationist theory.” InCritical Human Perspectives: The Integrational Turn in Philosophy of Language and Communication, ed. by Adrian Pablé , 96–113. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Orman, Jon
    2017b “Explanation and theory in linguistic inquiry.” Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication8(2): 167–186.10.1386/ejpc.8.2.167_1
    https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.8.2.167_1 [Google Scholar]
11. Pablé, Adrian
    2018 “Abandoning the simple by disintegrating the sign? Semiological reflections on Edda Weigand’s (meta)theory.” Language and Dialogue8(1): 84–101.10.1075/ld.00006.pab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00006.pab [Google Scholar]
12. Ritzau, Ursula
    2014 “Learner language and polylanguaging: How language students’ ideologies relate to their written language use.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism18(6): 660–675. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2014.936822
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.936822 [Google Scholar]
13. Toolan, Michael
    1996 Total Speech. An Integrational Linguistic Approach to Language. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Weigand, Edda
    2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]