Integrationist reflections on the place of dialogue in our communicational universe

References

1. Cowley, Stephen J.
   2007 “From Bodily Co-regulation to Language and Thinking.” Linguistics and the Human Sciences3(2): 137–164.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Drew, Paul and John C. Heritage
   1992 Talk at Work. Cambridge: CUP.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Goodwin, Charles
   1996 “Transparent Vision”. InInteraction and Grammared. by Elinor Ochs , Emanuel A. Schegloff and Sandra A. Thompson , 370–404. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008 [Google Scholar]
4. Harris, Roy
   1996 Signs, Language and Communication. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Harris, Roy
   1998 Introduction to Integrational Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Harris, Roy
   2009 After Epistemology. Gamlingay: Bright Pen.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Harris, Roy
   2012 Language and Intelligence. Sandy: Bright Pen.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Harris, Roy
   2013 “Performatives”. Unpublished ms.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hutchby, Ian and Robin Wooffitt
   1998 Conversation Analysis. Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Jones, Peter E.
    2003 “New Clothes for an Old Emperor: ‘Evolutionary Psychology’ and the Cognitive Counter-Revolution”, review ofEvolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognitioned. by Peter Carruthers and Andrew Chamberlain . Mind, Culture and Activity10(2): 173–180.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Jones, Peter E.
    2017 “Language – The Transparent Tool: Reflections on Reflexivity and Instrumentality”. Language Sciences61: 5–16.10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.011 [Google Scholar]
12. Linell, Per
    2005 The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. Oxford: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203342763
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203342763 [Google Scholar]
13. Linell, Per
    2009 Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ngai, Pun and Jenny Chan
    2012 “Global Capital, the State, and Chinese Workers: the Foxconn Experience”, Modern China38(4): 383–410.10.1177/0097700412447164
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700412447164 [Google Scholar]
15. Rose, Stephen P. R. , Richard C. Lewontin and Leon Kamin
    1984 Not in Our Genes. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1992 “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology, 97 (5): 295–1345.10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
17. Silverman, David
    1998 Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Smith, Cyril
    1996 Marx at the Millennium. London: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Smith, John
    2016 Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century. Globalization, Super-Exploitation, and Capitalism’s Final Crisis. New Delhi: Dev Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Taylor, Talbot J. and Deborah Cameron, D.
    1987 Analyzing Conversation. Rules and Units in the Structure of Talk. Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Weigand, Edda
    2009 Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
22. Weigand, Edda
    2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]