Sign making in dialogue

References

1. Beckner, Clay , Richard Blythe , Joan Bybee , Morten H. Christiansen , William Croft , Nick C. Ellis , John Holland , Jinyun Ke , Diane Larsen-Freeman and Tom Schoenemann
   2009 “Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper.” Language Learning59 (Issue Supplement s1): 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00533.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x [Google Scholar]
2. Blommaert, Jan
   2005 Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511610295
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295 [Google Scholar]
3. Capone, Alessandro and Jacob L. Mey
   (eds) 2016 Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑12616‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6 [Google Scholar]
4. Clark, Herbert H.
   1996 Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
5. Cowley, Stephen J.
   (ed) 2011 Distributed Language. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.34
   https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.34 [Google Scholar]
6. Damm, Bjarke
   2016 Sproglig betydningsdannelse i teori og praksis [Linguistic meaning-creation in theory and practice], (Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Copenhagen).
   [Google Scholar]
7. Davidson, Donald
   1984 “Communication and Convention.” Synthese59(1): 3–17. doi: 10.1007/BF00873278
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873278 [Google Scholar]
8. Davidson, Donald
   1986 “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs.” InPhilosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends, ed. by Richard E. Grandy and Richard Warner , 157–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Duncker, Dorthe
   2012 “‘What’s it called?’ – Conventionalization, glossing practices, and linguistic (in)determinacy.” Language and Communication32(4): 400–419. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2012.09.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.09.002 [Google Scholar]
10. Gadamer, Hans-Georg
    1975 [2013] Truth and Method. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Grice, H. Paul
    1957 “Meaning.” The Philosophical Review66(3): 377–388. doi: 10.2307/2182440
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182440 [Google Scholar]
12. Habermas, Jürgen
    1976 “Was heißt Universalpragmatik?“ InSprachpragmatik und Philosophie, ed. by Karl-Otto Apel , 174–272. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Harris, Roy
    1981 The language myth. London: Duckworth.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Harris, Roy
    1993 “Integrational Linguistics.” InActes du XVe congrès international des linguistes, ed. by André Crochetière , Jean-Claude Boulanger and Conrad Ouellon , 321–323. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université Laval.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Harris, Roy
    1996 Signs, Language and Communication. London, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Harris, Roy
    1998 Introduction to Integrational Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Harris, Roy
    2009 Integrationist Notes and Papers 2006–2008. Gamlingay: Bright Pen.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Harris, Roy and Christopher Hutton
    2007 Definition in Theory and Practice. Language, Lexicography and the Law. London, New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jones, Peter E.
    2016 “‘Coordination’ (Herbert H. Clark), ‘integration’ (Roy Harris) and the foundations of communication theory: common ground or competing visions?” Language Sciences53: 31–43. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2015.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.07.001 [Google Scholar]
20. Linell, Per
    1998 Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.3 [Google Scholar]
21. Love, Nigel
    1990 “The locus of languages in a redefined linguistics.” InRedefining Linguistics, ed. by Haley G. Davis and Talbot J. Taylor , 53–117. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Love, Nigel
    1993 “Integrationalism and linguistic theory.” InActes du XVe congrès international des linguistes, ed. by André Crochetière , Jean-Claude Boulanger and Conrad Ouellon , 330–332. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université Laval.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Love, Nigel
    2002 “The Language Myth and Historical Linguistics.” InThe language myth in western culture, ed. by Roy Harris , 25–40. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Martinet, André
    1984 “Double Articulation as a Criterion of Linguisticity.” Language Sciences6(1): 31–38. doi: 10.1016/S0388‑0001(84)80003‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(84)80003-0 [Google Scholar]
25. Orman, Jon and Adrian Pablé
    2016 “Polylanguaging, integrational linguistics and contemporary sociolinguistic theory: a commentary on Ritzau.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism19(5): 592–602.10.1080/13670050.2015.1024606
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1024606 [Google Scholar]
26. Pablé, Adrian and Christopher Hutton
    2015 Signs, Meaning and Experience: Integrational Approaches to Linguistics and Semiotics. Boston, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Inc.10.1515/9781501502286
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502286 [Google Scholar]
27. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2000 “When ‘others’ initiate repair.” Applied Linguistics21(2): 205–243. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.2.205
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.2.205 [Google Scholar]
28. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , Gail Jefferson and Harvey Sacks
    1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language53(2): 361–382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
29. Searle, John R.
    1964 “What is a speech act?” InPhilosophy in America, ed. by Max Black , 221–239. London: Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Taylor, Talbot J.
    2000 “Language constructing language: the implications of reflexivity for linguistic theory.” Language Sciences22(4): 483–499. doi: 10.1016/S0388‑0001(00)00016‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00016-4 [Google Scholar]
31. Toolan, Michael
    2017 “Can integrational linguistics be integrated with (critical) discourse analysis?” InCritical Humanist Perspectives. The Integrational Turn in Philosophy of Language and Communication, ed. by Adrian Pablé , 79–95. London, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Weigand, Edda
    2002 “The Language Myth and Linguistics Humanised.” InThe language myth in western culture, ed. by Roy Harris , 55–83. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Weigand, Edda
    2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]