1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The current study adopts a variational pragmatic approach to compare the dialogic sequence of the directive speech act of request and its reaction of consent versus refusal in Egyptian and Saudi Arabic. To this end, 413 Egyptian and Saudi undergraduate students completed a Discourse Completion Task (DCT). Data analysis indicated more differences between Egyptian and Saudi Arabic in request consent strategies than refusal strategies. Among the noted differences in consent strategies were Egyptians’ stronger preference for direct strategies and elaborate responses than Saudis who displayed more varied combination patterns and exhibited stronger gender differences. In refusal strategies, however, a general similarity between Egyptians and Saudis was obvious at the level of strategies, combination patterns and the influence of social factors.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00014.eld
2018-10-12
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alateeq, Eshaq H.
    2016Refusal Strategies in Saudi Arabian Social Settings. Master’s thesis atSouthern Illinois University Carbondale, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alfalig, Hanady A.
    2016Invitation in Saudi Arabic: A Socio-Pragmatic Analysis. Doctoral thesis atBall State University, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alhaidari, Abdulrahman A.
    2009The Art of Saying “No”: A Cross-Culture Pragmatic Comparison of Saudi and Australian Refusal Appropriateness Applied in Academic Settings. Master’s thesis atUniversity of Adelaide, Australia. Retrieved from: https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/handle/2440/98458
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Khatib, Mahmoud A.
    2006 “The Pragmatics of Invitation Making and Acceptance in Jordanian Society.” Journal of Language and Linguistics5(2): 272–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Al Qahtani, Abeer N.
    2015Favor Asking in Saudi Arabic. Master’s thesis atOklahoma State University, USA. Retrieved from: https://shareok.org/handle/11244/45226
    [Google Scholar]
  6. AlRefai, Einas H.
    2012Favor Asking in Kuwaiti Arabic: Effects of Power and Distance on Core Strategies and Modification. Doctoral thesis atOklahoma State University, USA. Retrieved from: digital.library.okstate.edu/etd/Alrefai_okstate_0664D_12367.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Al-Shboul, Yasser and Ibrahim F. Huwari
    2016 “A Comparative Study of Jordanian Arabic and American English Refusal Strategies.” British Journal of English Linguistics4(3): 50–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Al-Shboul, Yasser and Marlyna Maros
    2013 “Condolences Strategies by Jordanians to an Obituary Status Update on Facebook.” GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies13(3): 151–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Al-Shorman, Ra’ed A.
    2016 “Saudi and Jordanian Undergraduates’ Complaining Strategies: A Comparative Intralanguage Educational Linguistic Study.” Arab World English Journal7(1): 203–228.10.24093/awej/vol7no1.14
    https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no1.14 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ariff, Tun Nur A. Z. and Ahmad I. Mugableh
    2013 “Speech Act of Promising among Jordanians.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science3(13): 248–266.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Banikalef, Ala’Eddin A. A. , Marlyna Maros , Ashinida Aladdin , and Mouad Al-natour
    2015 Apology Strategies in Jordanian Arabic. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies15(2): 83–99.10.17576/gema‑2015‑1502‑06
    https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2015-1502-06 [Google Scholar]
  12. Barron, Anne
    2006 “Requesting in Irish English and English English: A study of Intra-lingual Regional Pragmatic Variation.” LAUD Papers. Paper no.684. Retrieved from: www.linse.uni-due.de/linse/laud/index.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Beebe, Leslie M. and Martha C. Cummings
    1996 “Natural Speech Act Data versus Written Questionnaire Data: How Data Collection Method Affects Speech Act Performance.” InSpeech Acts across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, ed. by Susan Gass and Joyce Neu , 65–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Beebe, Leslie M. , Tomoko Takahashi , and Robin Uliss-Weltz
    1990 “Pragmatic Transfer in ESL Refusals.” InDeveloping Communicative Competence in a Second Language, ed. by Robin C. Scarcella , Elaine S. Anderson , and Stephen D. Krashen , 55–73. New York: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Binasfour, Hajar S.
    2014Apology Strategies: A Comparison of Saudi English Learners and Native Speakers of American English. Master’s thesis atSouth Illinois University of Carbonale, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  17. El-Dakhs, Dina A. S.
    2017 “The Compliment Response Strategies of Egyptian Arabic-English Bilinguals.” Language and Dialogue7(3): 388–413.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (in press). “Investigating the Apology Strategies of Saudi Learners of English: Foreign Language Learning in Focus.” Pragmatics and Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Farenkia, Bernard M.
    2011 “Speech Acts and Regional Pragmatic Variations in French: The Case of Compliments on Skills in Cameroon and Canadian French.” Speech and Context2(3): 182–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2013 “ All Thanks Goes to the Almighty. A Variational and Post-Colonial Pragmatic Perspective on Responses to Thanks.” Sino-US English Teaching10(9): 707–724.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2015 “Invitation Refusals in Cameroon French and Hexagonal French.” Multilingua34(4): 577–603.10.1515/multi‑2014‑0108
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-0108 [Google Scholar]
  22. Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
    2006 “Linguistic Politeness in Mexico: Refusal Strategies among Male Speakers of Mexican Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics38(12): 2158–2187.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2010 “Intralingual Pragmatic Variation in Mexico City and San José, Costa Rica: A focus on Regional Differences in Female Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics42(11): 2992–3011.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.015 [Google Scholar]
  24. Grein, Marion
    2007 “The Speech Act of Refusals within the Minimal Action Game: A Comparative Study of German and Japanese.” InDialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand , 95–113. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.1.08gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.1.08gre [Google Scholar]
  25. 2017 “How Culture Affects Language and Dialogue.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand , 347–366. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hall, Edward T.
    1976Beyond Culture. New York, USA: Anchor Brooks/Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Han, Saem
    2013The Refusal Speech Acts of Two Generations of Korean Women: Mother-in-Law and Daughter-in-Law in Interaction. Doctoral thesis atLouisiana State University, USA. Retrieved from: digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=​2786andcontext​=gradschool_dissertations
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hofstede, Geert H.
    2001Culture’s Consequence: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, And Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hussein, Riyad F. and Mamoun T. Hammouri
    1998 “Strategies of Apology in Jordanian Arabic and American English.” Grazer Linguistiche Studien49: 37–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ibrahim, Sameh K. M.
    2012Invitations and Invitation Responses in Egyptian Arabic and American English: A Cross-Cultural, Cross-Linguistic Study. Master’s thesis atCairo University, Egypt. Retrieved from: erepository.cu.edu.eg/index.php/cutheses/article/view/2713
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Morkus, Nader
    2014 “Refusals in Egyptian Arabic and American English.” Journal of Pragmatics70: 86–107.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Morsi, Rehab
    2010The Speech Act of Thanking in Egyptian Arabic. Master’s thesis research paper atBall State University, USA. Retrieved from: cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/123456789/193733
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ren, Wei
    2015 “Sociopragmatic Variation in Mainland and Taiwan Chinese Refusals.” InResearching Sociopragmatic Variability, ed. by Kate Beeching and Helen Woodfield , 72–93. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137373953_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373953_4 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sarfo, Emmanuel
    2011 “Variations in Ways of Refusing Requests in English among Members of a College Community in Ghana.” African Nebula3: 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Schneider, Klaus P.
    2010 “Variational Pragmatics.” InVariation and Change: Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. by Mirjan Fried , Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren , 239–268. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hoph.6.18sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.6.18sch [Google Scholar]
  36. Schneider, Klaus P. and Anne Barron
    2008 “Where Pragmatics and Dialectology Meet: Introducing Variational Pragmatics.” InVariational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider and Anne Barron , 1–32. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.178.02sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.178.02sch [Google Scholar]
  37. Srichampa, Sophana
    2005 “Comparison of Greetings in the Vietnamese Dialects of Ha Noi and Ho Chi Minh City.” The Mon-Khmer Studies Journal35: 83–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Stapleton, Laura E.
    2004Variation in the Performance of Speech Acts in Peninsular Spanish: Apologies ad requests. Doctoral thesis at theLouisiana State University, USA. Retrieved from: etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-06032004-191432/unrestricted/Stapleton_dis.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Turnbull, William
    2001 “An Appraisal of Pragmatic Elicitation Techniques for the Social Psychological Study of Talk: The Case of Requests Refusals.” Pragmatics11(1): 31–61.10.1075/prag.11.1.03tur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.11.1.03tur [Google Scholar]
  40. Weigand, Edda
    2009Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2010a “Language as Dialogue.” Intercultural Pragmatics7(3): 505–515.10.1515/iprg.2010.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.022 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2010bDialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2017 “IADA History: The Unity of Dialogue and its Multiple Faces.” Language and Dialogue7(1): 63–79.10.1075/ld.7.1.05wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.1.05wei [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00014.eld
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00014.eld
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Arabic , pragmatic variation , request consent , request refusals and speech act
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error