1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In 8:1 (2018), Peter Jones wrote a critical article dealing with dialogical theory in the context of language and communication. His article covered several theoretical and methodological frameworks dealing with concepts of dialogue, here interpreted from the point-of-view of Roy Harris’s integrationism. Edda Weigand (this issue) has written a comprehensive discussion article which mainly focuses on Pablé (2018) and Orman (2018) as well as Harris’s original work. In my present response to Jones I deal almost exclusively with my own version of “extended dialogism”, which was included among his targets. I argue that extended dialogism is actually a form of moderate integrationism. I demonstrate that Jones’s contribution has several interesting points, but that it also contains a number of misguided interpretations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00017.lin
2018-10-12
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allwood, Jens
    1976Linguistic Communication as Action and Cooperation. (Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics, 2). Göteborg: Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anward, Jan
    2015Doing Language. (Studies in Language and Culture, 26). Linköping University: Department of Culture and Communication.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anward, Jan and Linell, Per
    2016 “On the Grammar of Utterances: Putting the Form vs. Substance Distinction Back on its Feet.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, doi: 10.1080/03740463.2016.1159819: 1–24.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2016 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnett, Ronald
    2017 Review of Pablé, Adrian and Hutton, Christopher, “Signs, Meaning, and Experience: Integrational Approaches to Linguistics and Semiotics”. Language and Dialogue7(3): 459–466.10.1075/ld.7.3.08arn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.3.08arn [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by C. Emerson and M. Holquist , edited by M. Holquist . Austin: Texas University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, Herbert H. and Eve Clark
    1977Psychology and Language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cowley, Stephen
    2011a “Distributed language.” InDistributed Languageed. by S. Cowley , 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.34.01cow
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.34.01cow [Google Scholar]
  8. 2011b “Taking a language stance.” Ecological Psychology23: 185–209.10.1080/10407413.2011.591272
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2011.591272 [Google Scholar]
  9. Donald, Merlin
    1991Origins of the Modern Mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Duncker, Dorthe
    2018 “Sign making in dialogue.” Language and Dialogue8(1): 139–158.10.1075/ld.00009.dun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00009.dun [Google Scholar]
  11. Engdahl, Elisabet and Per Linell
    2018 “Responsivitet, inkrementering och dynamisk förändring: Om yttranden som processer och produkter.” [“Responsivity, incrementation and dynamic change: On utterances as processes and products”]. Helsinki: Språk och interaktion [“Language and Interaction”] 4: 111–144Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gallagher, Shaun
    2011 “Interpretations of embodied cognition.” InThe Implications of Embodiment: Cognition and Communication, ed. by T. Tschacher and C. Bergomi , 59–71. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodwin, Charles
    2018Co-Operative Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gray, J. G.
    1968Introduction. In Heidegger (1948): xvii–xxvii.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Harnad, Steven
    2008 “Why and how the problem of the evolution of Universal Grammar (UG) is hard.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences31: 524–525.10.1017/S0140525X08005153
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08005153 [Google Scholar]
  16. Harris, Roy
    1980The Language-Makers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1981The Language Myth. London: Duckworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1996Signs, Language and Communication. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1998aIntroduction to Integrational Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1998b “Language as social interaction: Integrationalism versus segregationalism.” InIntegrational Linguistics: A First reader, ed. by R. Harris and G. Wolf , 5–14. Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 1998c “The integrationist critique of orthodox linguistics.” InIntegrational Linguistics: A First reader, ed. by R. Harris and G. Wolf , 15–26. Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Heidegger, Martin
    1968What is called thinking. Transl. by D. D. Wieck and J. G. Gray . New York and London: Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones, Peter
    2018 “Integrationist reflections on the place of dialogue in our communicational universe: Laying the ghost of segregationism?” Language and Dialogue8(1): 118–138.10.1075/ld.00008.jon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00008.jon [Google Scholar]
  24. Joseph, John
    1997 “The “language myth” myth. Or, Roy Harris’s red herrings.” InLinguistics Inside Out: Roy Harris and His Critics, ed. by G. Wolf and N. Love , 9–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.148.05jos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.148.05jos [Google Scholar]
  25. Kjørup, Søren
    1983Hvorfor smiler Mona Lisa? (”Why is Mona Lisa smiling?”). Copenhagen: Gjellerup.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Latour, Bruno
    1995Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1996 “On interobjectivity.” Mind, Culture & Activity3: 228–245.10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lenz Taguchi, Hillevi
    2011 “Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach.” Global Studies of Childhood1: 36–50.10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.36
    https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.36 [Google Scholar]
  29. Levelt, Willem
    1989Speaking. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Levinson, Stephen
    1979 “Activity types and language.” Linguistics17: 365–399.10.1515/ling.1979.17.5‑6.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.5-6.365 [Google Scholar]
  31. Linell, Per
    1982The Written Language Bias in Linguistics. (SIC, 2). Linköping: Department of Communication Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1990 “The power of dialogue dynamics.” InThe Dynamics of Dialogue, ed. by I. Marková and K. Foppa , 147–177. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Linell, Per
    1998Approaching Dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.3 [Google Scholar]
  34. Linell, Per
    2005The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origin and Transformations. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203342763
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203342763 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2009Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2010 “Communicative activity types as organisations in discourses and discourses in organisations.” InDiscourses in Interaction, ed. by S. -K. Tanskanen , M. -L. Helasvuo , M. Johansson , J. Karhukorpi , and M. Raitaniemi , 33–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.203.05lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.203.05lin [Google Scholar]
  37. 2015 “Mishearings are occasioned by contextual assumptions and situational affordances.” Language & Communication40: 24–37.10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.009 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2016Chomskyanism: from innovation to irrelevance. Slightly revised several times from 2013 and onwards. Available atipkl.gu.se/english/contact/staff/per.linell/
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2017 “Dialogue, dialogicality, and interaction: A conceptually bewildering field?” Language and Dialogue7: 301–336.10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin [Google Scholar]
  40. 2018a “The Dynamics of Contexts in Sense-Making.” InCo-Operative Engagements of Intertwined Semiosis: Essays in Honour of Charles Goodwin, ed. by D. Favareau , 227–240. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2018b “The Written Language Bias (WLB) in Linguistics 40 Years After.” To be published inLanguage Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Love, Nigel
    1990 “The locus of language in a redefined linguistics.” InRedefining Linguistics, ed. by H. G. Davis and T. J. Taylor , 53–117. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2004 “Cognition and the language myth.” Language Sciences26: 525–544.10.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  44. MacNeilage, Peter
    2008The Origin of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Marková, Ivana
    1987Human Awareness: Its social development. London: Hutchinson.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Marková, Ivana
    2003Dialogicality and Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Marková, Ivana
    2016The Dialogical Mind: Common Sense and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753602
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753602 [Google Scholar]
  48. . forthc. “Conclusion.” InImagining Collective Futures: Perspectives from Social, Cultural and Political Psychology ed. by C. de Saint-Laurent , S. Obradovic , and K. R. Carriere . London: Palgrave/Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Maturana, Humberto
    1970Biology of Cognition. BCL report 9.0. University of Illinois, Urbana.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
    1964 “The philosopher and his shadow.” InSigns, ed. by M. Merleau-Ponty , 159–181. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Mondada, Lorenza
    2014 “The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics65: 137–156.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  52. Orman, Jon
    2018 “Theorising the untheorisable? Notes on integrationism and the ‘Mixed-Game Model’.” Language and Dialogue8(1): 102–117.10.1075/ld.00007.orm
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00007.orm [Google Scholar]
  53. Pablé, Adrian
    2018 “Abandoning the simple by disintegrating the sign? Semiological reflections on Edda Weigand’s (meta)theory.” Language and Dialogue8(1): 84–101.10.1075/ld.00006.pab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00006.pab [Google Scholar]
  54. Panofsky, Erwin
    1955Meaning in the Visual Arts: Papers in and on Art History. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Parolin, Laura and Mattozzi, Alvise
    2013 Selective translations: Sensitive dimension and knowledge within two craftsmen’s workplaces. Scandinavian Journal of Management29: 353–366.10.1016/j.scaman.2013.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  56. Pedersen, Sarah Bro
    2015The Cognitive Ecology of Human Errors in Emergency Medicine: An Interactivity-Based Approach. Ph.D. thesis. Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1998 “Reply to Wetherell.” Discourse & Society9: 413–416.10.1177/0957926598009003006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003006 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  59. Shotter, John
    2012 “Commentary 2 to Part 1: From ‘Already Made Things’ to ‘Things in Their Making’: inquiring ‘from within’ the dialogic.” InDialogicality in Focus: Challenges to Theory, Method and Application, ed. by M. Märtsin , B. Wagoner , E. -L. Aveling , I. Kadianaki , and L. Whittaker , 77–101. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Steffensen, Sune V.
    2015 “Distributed Language and Dialogism: Notes on non-locality, sense-making and interactivity.” Language Sciences50: 105–119.10.1016/j.langsci.2015.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  61. Streeck, Jürgen and Scott Jordan
    2008 “Communication as a dynamical self-sustaining system: the importance of time-scales and nested context.” Communication Theory19: 445–464.10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2009.01351.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01351.x [Google Scholar]
  62. Taylor, Talbot
    1997Theorizing Language: Analysis, Normativity, Rhetoric, History. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 2013 “Calibrating the child for language: Meredith Williams on a Wittgensteinian approach to language socialization.” Language Sciences40: 308–320.10.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  64. Thibault, Paul
    2011 “First order languaging dynamics and second-order language: the distributed language view.” Ecological Psychology23: 210–245.10.1080/10407413.2011.591274
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2011.591274 [Google Scholar]
  65. 2017 “The reflexivity of human languaging and Nigel Love’s two orders of language.” Language Sciences61: 74–85.10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.014 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2018 “Integrating self, voice, experience: Some thoughts on Harris’s idea of self-communication and its relevance to a dialogical account of languaging.” Language and Dialogue8(1): 162–182.10.1075/ld.00010.thi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00010.thi [Google Scholar]
  67. Trasmundi, Sarah Bro and Per Linell
    2017 “Insights and their Emergence in Everyday Practices: the interplay between problems and solutions in emergency medicine.” Pragmatics and Cognition24: 62–90.10.1075/pc.17002.tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17002.tra [Google Scholar]
  68. Trasmundi, Sarah Bro and Sune Vork Steffensen
    2016 “Meaning emergence in the ecology of dialogical systems.” Psychology of Language and Communication20(2): 154–181.10.1515/plc‑2016‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2016-0009 [Google Scholar]
  69. Vygotsky, Lev
    1978Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Weigand, Edda
    2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  71. 2018 “The theory myth.” Language and Dialogue8(2).10.1075/ld.00016.wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00016.wei [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00017.lin
Loading
  • Article Type: Discussion
Keyword(s): communication , dialogism , dialogue , integrationism , sense-making and verbal interaction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error