On the role of gaze in the organization of turn-taking and sequence organization in interpreter-mediated dialogue

References

1. Angelelli, Claudia
   2000 “Interpretation as a Communicative Event: A Look through Hymes’ Lenses.” Translators’ Journal45(4): 580–592.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Auer, Peter
   2005 “Projection in interaction and projection in grammar.” Text25(1): 7–36. 10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7
   https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7 [Google Scholar]
3. Auer, Peter
   2017 “Gaze, addressee selection and turn-taking in three-party interaction.” InLiSt (60): 1–32.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baraldi, Claudio and Laura Gavioli
   2012 “Introduction: Understanding coordination in interpreter-mediated interaction.” InCoordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting, ed. byClaudio Baraldi and Laura Gavioli, 1–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.102
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.102 [Google Scholar]
5. Bavelas, B. Janet, Linda Coates, and Trudy Johnson
   2002 “Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze.” Journal of Communication52(3): 566–580. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02562.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02562.x [Google Scholar]
6. Bolden, Galina
   2000 “Toward understanding practices of medical interpreting: interpreters’ involvement in history taking.” Discourse Studies2(4): 387–419. 10.1177/1461445600002004001
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002004001 [Google Scholar]
7. Bot, Hanneke
   2005 Dialogue Interpreting in Mental Health. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brône, Geert, Bert Oben, Annelies Jehoul, Jelena Vranjes and Kurt Feyaerts
   2017 “Eye gaze and viewpoint in multimodal interaction management.” Cognitive Linguistics28(3): 449–484. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0119
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0119 [Google Scholar]
9. Clayman, Steven E.
   2013 “Turn-Constructional Units and the Transition-Relevance-Place.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 150–166. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Tsuyoshi Ono
    2007 “‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese.” Pragmatics17(4): 513–552. 10.1075/prag.17.4.02cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.4.02cou [Google Scholar]
11. Davidson, Brad
    2002 “A model for the construction of conversational common ground in interpreted discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics34: 1273–1300. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00025‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00025-5 [Google Scholar]
12. Davitti, Elena
    2013 “Dialogue Interpreting as Intercultural Mediation: Interpreter’s use of upgrading moves in parent-teacher meetings.” Interpreting15(2): 168–199. 10.1075/intp.15.2.02dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.15.2.02dav [Google Scholar]
13. Davitti, Elena and Sergio Pasquandrea
    2017 “Embodied participation: What multimodal analysis can tell us about interpreter-mediated encounters in pedagogical settings.” Journal of Pragmatics107: 105–128. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.008 [Google Scholar]
14. Duncan, Starkey
    1972 “Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology23 (2): 283–292. 10.1037/h0033031
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033031 [Google Scholar]
15. Englund Dimitrova, Birgitta
    1997 “Degree of Interpreter Responsibility in the Interaction Process in Community Interpreting.” InCritical Link: Interpreters in the Community, ed. bySilvana E. Carr, 147–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.19.17eng
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.19.17eng [Google Scholar]
16. Ford, Cecilia E.
    2004 “Contingency and units in interaction.” Discourse Studies6(1): 27–52. 10.1177/1461445604039438
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604039438 [Google Scholar]
17. Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
    1996 “Practices in the construction of turns: The TCU revisted.” Pragmatics6(3): 427–454. 10.1075/prag.6.3.07for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.3.07for [Google Scholar]
18. Frischen, Alexandra, Andrew P. Bayliss, and Steven P. Tipper
    2007 “Gaze Cueing of Attention: Visual Attention, Social Cognition, and Individual Differences.” Psychological Bulletin133(4): 694–724. 10.1037/0033‑2909.133.4.694
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694 [Google Scholar]
19. Goodwin, Charles
    1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. byGeorge Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Goodwin, Charles
    1981 Conversational Organization. Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York/ London: Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goodwin, Charles
    2013 “The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics46: 8–23. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
22. Hayashi, Makoto
    2013 “Turn Allocation and Turn Sharing.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 167–190. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Houtkoop, Hanneke and Mazeland, Harrie
    1985 “Turns and discourse units in everyday conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics9: 595–619.10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90055‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90055-4 [Google Scholar]
24. Kendon, Adam
    1967 “Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction.” Acta Psychologica26: 22–63. 10.1016/0001‑6918(67)90005‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4 [Google Scholar]
25. Lang, Ranier
    1978 “Behavioral aspects of liaison interpreters in Papua New Guinea: some preliminary observations.” InLanguage Interpretation and Communication, ed. byDavid Gerver and Wallace H. Sinaiko, 231–244. New York/ London: Plenum Press. 10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑9077‑4_21
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9077-4_21 [Google Scholar]
26. Lerner, Gene H.
    1991 “On the Syntax of Sentences in Progress.” Language in Society20: 441–458. 10.1017/S0047404500016572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572 [Google Scholar]
27. Lerner, Gene H.
    2003 “Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization.” Language in Society32: 177–201. 10.1017/S004740450332202X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X [Google Scholar]
28. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2012 “Action formation and ascription.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 103–131. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch6 [Google Scholar]
29. Levinson, Stephen C. and Francisco Torreira
    2015 “Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language.” InTurn-taking in Human Communicative Interaction, ed. byJudith Holler, Kobin H. Kendrick, Marisa Casillas and Stephen C. Levinson, 10–27. Lausanne: Frontiers Media.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Llewellyn-Jones, Peter and Robert G. Lee
    2014 Redefining the Role of the Community Interpreter: The Concept of role-space. Lincoln: SLI Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Li, Shuangyu
    2015 “Nine Types of Turn-taking in Interpreter-mediated GP Consultations.” Applied Linguistics Review6(1): 73–96. 10.1515/applirev‑2015‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0004 [Google Scholar]
32. Licoppe, Christian
    . Forthcoming. “The interpreter as a sequential coordinator in courtroom interaction. ’Chunking’ and the management of turn shifts in extended answers in consecutively interpreted asylum hearings with remote participants.” Interpreting.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Licoppe, Christian, Maud Verdier, and Clair-Antoine Veyrier
    2018 “Voice, control and turn-taking in multi-lingual, consecutively interpreted courtroom proceedings with video links. InRemote Interpreting, ed. byRobert Skinner, Jemina Napier and Sabina Braun, 299–322. Washington (DC): Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mandelbaum, Jenny
    2013 “Storytelling in Conversation.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 492–509. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mason, Ian
    2012 “Gaze, positioning and identity in interpreter-mediated dialogues.” InCoordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting, ed. byClaudio Baraldi and Laura Gavioli, 177–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.102.08mas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.102.08mas [Google Scholar]
36. Merlino, Sara
    2014 “Traduction orale et organisation de la parole: la gestion multimodale des transitions.” InCorps en interaction: participation, spatialité, mobilité, ed. byLorenza Mondada, 65–105. Lyon: ENS Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mondada, Lorenza
    2007 “Multimodal resources for turn-taking: pointing and emergence of next speakers.” Discourse Studies9(2): 194–225. 10.1177/1461445607075346
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346 [Google Scholar]
38. Mondada, Lorenza
    2018 “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction51(1): 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
39. Pasquandrea, Sergio
    2011 “Managing multiple actions through multimodality: Doctors’ involvement in interpreter-mediated interactions.” Language in Society40 (4): 455–481. 10.1017/S0047404511000479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404511000479 [Google Scholar]
40. Rossano, Federico
    2012 Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction. PhD Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
41. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50: 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
42. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1982 “Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences.” InAnalyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, ed. byDeborah Tannen, 71–93. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” Interaction and Grammar52–133. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
44. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2000 “Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language in Society29: 1–63. 10.1017/S0047404500001019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019 [Google Scholar]
45. Schmitt, Reinhold
    2005 “Zur multimodalen Struktur von turn-taking.“ Gesprächsforschung6: 17–61.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Selting, Margaret
    2000 “The construction of units in conversational talk.” Language in Society29: 477–517. 10.1017/S0047404500004012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004012 [Google Scholar]
47. Sidnell, Jack and Tanya Stivers
    (eds) 2013 The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Blackwell-Wiley. 10.1002/9781118325001
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001 [Google Scholar]
48. Stivers, Tanya
    2008 “Stance, Alignment and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction41 (1): 31–57. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
49. Stivers, Tanya
    2013 “Sequence organization.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 191–209. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Stivers, Tanya and Federico Rossano
    2010 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction43 (1): 3–31. 10.1080/08351810903471258
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258 [Google Scholar]
51. Streeck, Jürgen
    2014 “Mutual gaze and recognition. Revisiting Kendon’s “Gaze direction in two-person conversation””. InFrom Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon, ed. byMandana Seyfeddinpur and Marianne Gullberg, 35–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.188.03str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.188.03str [Google Scholar]
52. Vranjes, Jelena, Hanneke, Bot, Kurt Feyaerts and Geert Brône
    . Forthcoming. “Displaying recipiency in an interpreter-mediated dialogue: an eye-tracking study.” InEye-tracking in Interaction. Studies on the Role of Eye Gaze in Dialogue ed. by Brône Geert and Bert Oben. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ais.10.12vra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.10.12vra [Google Scholar]
53. Wadensjö, Cecilia
    1998 Interpreting as interaction. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann, and Han Sloetjes
    2006 “ELAN: a Professional Framework for Multimodality Research.” InProceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1556–1559. ELRA (European Language Resources Association).
    [Google Scholar]