1887
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article, introducing the Special Issue, investigates the notion of “agency of language” and its historical roots: the phenomenological emphasis on the social actors’ role in constituting their Life-World. It reconstructs the genesis – at the beginning of the 20th century – of two ideas that still nourish contemporary interactional and pragmatic views of language: language meaning relies on use, language is a tool to perform activities. Focusing on dialogue in institutional settings, it illustrates how cultures, social orders, and moral horizons are talked-into-being and shaped through the activities performed in institutional talk. It also presents the contributions in the Special Issue that address the co-constitutive relationship between language, interaction, and culture from different disciplinary perspectives as well as methodological approaches.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00029.orl
2019-07-05
2019-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adeslwärd, Viveka, Karin Aronsson, Linda Jönsonn and Per Linell
    1987 “The Unequal distribution of interactional space: Dominance and control in courtroom Interaction”. Text7 (4): 313–346.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahearn, Laura M.
    2001 “Language and agency.” Annual Review of Anthropology30 (1): 109–137. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander, Jeffrey C.
    1987The Micro-Marco Link. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Antaki, Charles
    2012 “What actions mean, to whom, and when.” Discourse Studies14(4): 493–498. 10.1177/1461445611433959
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611433959 [Google Scholar]
  5. Atkinson, J. Maxwell and John Heritage
    (eds.) 1984aStructures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1984b “Preference Organization.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 53–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Atkinson, J. Maxwell and Paul Drew
    1979Order in Court. London: MacMillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑04057‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04057-5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Austin, John L.
    1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    1981The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1986Speech Genres and Other Later Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bateson, Gregory
    1979Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bauman, Zygmunt
    1996 “Sociology.” InThe Social Science Encyclopedia, 2nd ed.London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Baxter, Leslie A.
    2011Voicing Relationships: A Dialogic Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bazzanella, Carla
    2002Sul dialogo [On dialogue]. Milano: Guerini.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Benveniste, Emile
    1966Problèmes de linguistique générale [Problems of General Linguistics]. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Berger, Paul and Thomas Luckmann
    1966The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1982Ce que parler veut dire: L’économie des échanges linguistiques [The Economy of the Linguistic Exchanges]. Paris: Fayard.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1977Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507 [Google Scholar]
  19. 1990The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1993 “À propos de la famille comme catégorie réalisée.” [On family as realized category] Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales100: 32–36. 10.3406/arss.1993.3070
    https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1993.3070 [Google Scholar]
  21. Boyd, Elizabeth and John Heritage
    2006 “Taking the History: Questioning during Comprehensive History Taking.” InCommunication in Medical Care: Interaction between Physicians and Patients, ed. byJohn Heritage and Douglas W. Maynard, 151–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607172.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.008 [Google Scholar]
  22. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bruner, Jerome S.
    1986Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1990Acts of Meaning. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1991 “The narrative construction of reality.” Critical Inquiry18 (1): 1–21. 10.1086/448619
    https://doi.org/10.1086/448619 [Google Scholar]
  26. Byrne, Patrick S. and Barrie E. L. Long
    1976Doctors Talking to Patients: A Study of the Verbal Behaviour of General Practitioners Consulting in their Surgeries. London: Royal College of General Practitioners Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Caronia, Letizia and François Cooren
    2014 “Decentering our analytical position: The dialogicity of things.” Discourse and Communication8: 41–61. 10.1177/1750481313503226
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313503226 [Google Scholar]
  28. Caronia, Letizia
    2015 “Totem and taboo: The embarrassing epistemic work of things in the research setting.” Qualitative Research15(2): 141–165. 10.1177/1468794113517392
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113517392 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2018 “How at home is an ethnographer “at-home”? Territories of knowledge and the making of ethnographic understanding.” Journal of Organizational Ethnography7: 114–134. 10.1108/JOE‑12‑2017‑0067
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-12-2017-0067 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2019 “Following and Analyzing an Artifact: Culture-through-things.” InMethodological and Ontological Principles of Observation and Analysis, ed. byFrançois Cooren and Fabienne Malbois, 112–138. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Cefaï, Daniel
    1998Phénoménologie et sciences sociales. Alfred Schutz: Naissance d’une anthropologie philosophique. Paris et Genève: Librairie Droz. 10.3917/droz.cefai.1998.01
    https://doi.org/10.3917/droz.cefai.1998.01 [Google Scholar]
  32. Cicourel, Aaron V.
    1981 “Notes on the integration of micro- and macro-levels of analysis.” InAnalysis in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies, ed. byKarin Knorr-Cetina and Aaron V. Cicourel, 51–80. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1980 “Three models of discourse analysis: The role of social structure.” Discourse processes3 (2): 101–131. 10.1080/01638538009544482
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538009544482 [Google Scholar]
  34. 1992 “The Interpenetration of Communicative Contexts: Examples from Medical Encounters.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. byAlessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 291–310. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Clark, Herbert H.
    1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  36. Cooren, François
    2004 “Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings.” Organization11(3): 373–393. 10.1177/1350508404041998
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041998 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2010Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
  38. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting
    2017Interactional Linguistics. Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Drew, Paul and John Heritage
    1992Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Drew, Paul
    2006 “When documents speak: Documents, language and interaction.” InTalk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, ed. byPaul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond and Darin Weinberg, 63–80. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781849209991.n5
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209991.n5 [Google Scholar]
  41. Duranti, Alessandro and Charles Goodwin
    1992Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Duranti, Alessandro and Donald Brenneis
    1986 “The Audience as Co-author: An Introduction”. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse6(3): 239–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Duranti, Alessandro
    1994From Grammar to Politics. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 1997Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511810190
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810190 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2001 “Relativity”. InKey Terms in Language and Culture, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, 129–131. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2003 “Il parlare come pratica sociale [“I’m by myself”].” InManuale di psicologia sociale, ed. byGiuseppe Mantovani. Firenze: Giunti.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2004 “Agency in Language.” InA Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, 451–473. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2011 “Linguistic Anthropology: Language as a Non-Neutral Medium.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. byRajend Mesthrie. 28–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511997068.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997068.006 [Google Scholar]
  49. Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter
    1992Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2001 “Discursive psychology.” InHow to Analyze Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods, ed. byAlec McHoul and Mark Rapley. 12–24. London and New York: Continuum International.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Edwards, Derek
    1997Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2005 “Discursive psychology.” InHandbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. byKristine L. Fitch and Robert E. Sanders, 257–273. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Discourse and Power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Fasulo, Alessandra and Cristina Zucchermaglio
    2008 “Narratives in the workplace: Facts, fiction and canonicity.” Text and Talk28(3): 351–376. doi:  10.1515/TEXT.2008.017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.017 [Google Scholar]
  55. Galatolo, Renata, Erika Vassallo and Letizia Caronia
    2015 ““Je m’en mets toute seule”: Séquences d’étayage dans les repas de famille [“I’ll do it by myself”. Sequences of scaffolding during family dinnertimes]”. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée101: 117–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Garfinkel, Harold and Kenneth Liberman
    2007 “Introduction: The Lebenswelt origins of the sciences.” Human Studies30(1): 3–7. 10.1007/s10746‑007‑9045‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-007-9045-x [Google Scholar]
  57. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Geertz, Clifford
    1973The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Gergen, Kenneth J.
    1985 “The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology.” American Psychologist40(3): 266–275. 10.1037/0003‑066X.40.3.266
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.3.266 [Google Scholar]
  60. Gergen, Mary M. and Kenneth J. Gergen
    2003Social Construction: A Reader. London, Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Giddens, Anthony
    1979Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑16161‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 [Google Scholar]
  62. 1984The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 1991Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Gill, Virginia T. and Douglas, W. Maynard
    2006 “Explaining Illness: Patients’ Proposals and Physicians’ Responses”. InCommunication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. ed. byJohn Heritage and Douglas, W. Maynard, 115–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607172.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.007 [Google Scholar]
  65. Goffman, Erving
    1955 “On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.” Psychiatry18 (3): 213–231. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
  66. 1967Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. 1971Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 1974Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 1983 “The interaction order.” American Sociological Review48: 1–17. 10.2307/2095141
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141 [Google Scholar]
  71. Goodwin, Charles and Alessandro Duranti
    1992 “Rethinking Context: An Introduction.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. byAlessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 1–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Goodwin, Charles
    1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. byGeorge Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 1981Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. 1994 “Professional vision”. American Anthropologist96(3): 606–633. 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
  75. 2011 “Contextures of Action.” InEmbodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, ed. byJurgen Streek, Charles Goodwin and Curt LeBaron, 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Greatbatch, David L.
    1988 “A Turn Taking system for british news interviews.” Language in Society17: 401–430. 10.1017/S0047404500012963
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012963 [Google Scholar]
  77. 2006 “Prescriptions and Prescribing: Coordinating Talk- and Text-based Activities.” InCommunication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. byJohn Heritage and Douglas Maynard, 313–339. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607172.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.013 [Google Scholar]
  78. Grice, Paul
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSpeech Acts, ed. byPeter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. 1978 “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, ed. byPeter Cole, 113–127. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Gumperz, John J.
    1964 “Linguistic and Social Interaction in Two Communities.” InThe Ethnography of Communication, ed. byJ. J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes, American Anthropologist66 (6), II [Special Issue]: 137–153. 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
  81. 1982Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Gumperz, John J. and Stephen Levinson
    1996Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    1978Language as Social Semiotics. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. ten Have, Paul
    1989 “The Consultation as a Genre.” InText and Talk as Social Practice, ed. byB. I. Torode, 115–135. Dordrecht-Providence: R.I. Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Heath, Christian and Paul Luff
    2012 “Embodied Action and Organizational Activity.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 283–330. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  86. Heath, Christian
    1984 “Participation in the medical consultation: The co-ordination of erbal and non-verbal behaviour between the doctor and the patient.” Sociology of Health and Illness6(3): 311–388. 10.1111/1467‑9566.ep10491964
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10491964 [Google Scholar]
  87. 1986Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511628221
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628221 [Google Scholar]
  88. 1992 “Diagnosis and Assessment in the Medical Consultation.” InTalk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 235–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. 2006 “Body Work: The Collaborative Production of the Clinical Object.” InCommunication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. byJohn Heritage and Douglas Maynard, 185–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607172.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.009 [Google Scholar]
  90. Heritage, John and Douglas W. Maynard
    2006Communication in Medical Care. Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511607172
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172 [Google Scholar]
  91. Heritage, John and Jeffrey D. Robinson
    2006 “Accounting for the visit: giving reasons for seeking medical care.” InCommunication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patientsed. byJohn Heritage and Douglas Maynard, 48–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607172.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.005 [Google Scholar]
  92. Heritage, John and Stephen Clayman
    2010Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444318135
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
  93. Heritage, John, Jeffrey Robinson, Marc Elliott, Marion Beckett and Michael Wilkes
    2007 “Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make.” Journal of General Internal Medicine22(10): 1429–1433. 10.1007/s11606‑007‑0279‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0 [Google Scholar]
  94. Heritage, John
    1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. 2004 “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk.” InQualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, ed. byDavid Silverman, 222–245. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. 2011 “A Galilean moment in social theory? Language, culture and their emergent properties.” Qualitative Sociology34: 263–270. 10.1007/s11133‑010‑9180‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-010-9180-y [Google Scholar]
  97. Husserl, Edmund
    1970 [1936]The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Translated and edited byDavid Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Hymes, Dell
    1962 “The ethnography of speaking.” Anthropology and Human Behavior13 (53): 11–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. 1964Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. 1974 “Ways of Speaking.” InExplorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. byRichard Bauman and Joel Sherzer, 433–452. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Jacquemet, Marco
    1996Credibility in Court. Communicative Practices in the Camorra Trials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Jefferson, Gail
    1973 “A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences.” Semiotica9(1): 47–96. 10.1515/semi.1973.9.1.47
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.9.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  103. Kendon, Adam
    1990Conducting Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2010 “The Case for an Eclectic Approach to Discourse-in-Interaction.” InNew Adventures in Language and Interaction, ed. byJurgen Streeck, 71–98. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.196.04ore
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.196.04ore [Google Scholar]
  105. Labov, William and David Fanshel
    1977Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Linell, Per
    1998Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.3 [Google Scholar]
  107. 2009Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Lucy, John A.
    1997 “Linguistic relativity.” Annual Review of Anthropology26: 291–312. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.291
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.291 [Google Scholar]
  109. Malinowski, Bronislaw
    1923 “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages”. InThe Meaning of Meaning, ed. byCharles K. Ogden and Ivor A. Richards, 296–336. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. 1935Coral Gardens and Their Magic. London: Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Mandelbaum, Jenny
    2013 “Storytelling in Conversation.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 492–507. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. McHoul, Alexander
    1978 “The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom.” Language in Society7(1): 183–213. 10.1017/S0047404500005522
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005522 [Google Scholar]
  113. Mehan, Hugh
    1979Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674420106
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674420106 [Google Scholar]
  114. Mohanty, Jitendra Nath
    (ed.) 1985Phenomenology and the Human Sciences. Dordrecht, Martinus Nijoff /Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑5081‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5081-8 [Google Scholar]
  115. Mondada, Lorenza
    2011 “The Organization of Concurrent Courses of Action in Surgical Demonstration.” InEmbodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. byJurgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin and Curtis LeBaron. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. 2009 “Videorecording practices and the reflexive constitution of the interaction.” Human Studies32: 67–99. 10.1007/s10746‑009‑9110‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9110-8 [Google Scholar]
  117. Natanson, Maurice
    1973Phenomenology and the Social Sciences. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Orletti, Franca
    1981 “Classroom Verbal Interaction: A Conversational Analysis.” InPossibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, ed. byHerman Parret, Marina Sbisà and Jef Verschueren, 531–550. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.7.31orl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.7.31orl [Google Scholar]
  119. 1994Fra conversazione e discorso: l’analisi dell’interazione verbale [Between conversation and discourse: the analisys of verbal interaction]. Firenze: NIS.
    [Google Scholar]
  120. 2000La conversazione diseguale. Potere e interazione [Unequal conversations. Power and interaction]. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. 2013 “L’emergere e la costruzione delle identità nell’interazione medico-paziente in contesti multiculturali.” [Identity emergence and construction in doctor-patient interaction in multicultural encounters] InLa sfida della multiculturalità nell’interazione medico-paziente, ed. byFranca Orletti and Marilena Fatigante, Salute e società [Special issue], 12(1):61–75. doi:  10.3280/SES2013‑001006
    https://doi.org/10.3280/SES2013-001006 [Google Scholar]
  122. 2015 “Le forme dell’autodiagnosi: negoziazioni dell’asimmetria di conoscenze fra medico e paziente [The shapes of auto-diagnoses: doctor-patient knowledge-asymmetry negotiations].” InTra linguistica medica e linguistica clinica. Il ruolo del linguista, ed. byFranca Orletti, Anna Cardinaletti and Francesca Dovetto, Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata [Special Issue] 44(3): 546–560.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Orletti, Franca and Marilena Fatigante
    2013La sfida della multiculturalità nell’interazione medico-paziente [The doctor-patient challenge of multiculturalism]. Salute e società [Special Issue] 12(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Orletti, Franca and Rossella Iovino
    2016 “Latin as a Tool for Social Differentiation. A Study of the Italian Juridical and Medical Language”. 3rd ISA Forum of Sociology, Vienna, 10–14July.
  125. Philips, Susan
    2004 “Language and Social Inequality”. InA Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, 474–495. Oxford: Backwell Publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Pomerantz, Anita and John Heritage
    2013 “Preference.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 229–256. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Pontecorvo, Clotilde, Anna M. Ajello and Cristina Zucchermaglio
    1992Discutendo si impara [Learning by talking together]. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Pontecorvo, Clotilde
    1993a “Social Interaction in the Acquisition of Knowledge.” Educational Psychology Review5(3): 293–310. 10.1007/BF01323049
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323049 [Google Scholar]
  129. 1993b “Introduction: Forms of Discourse and Shared Thinking.” Cognition and Instruction11(3/4): 189–196. 10.1080/07370008.1993.9649019
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1993.9649019 [Google Scholar]
  130. Potter, Jonathan and Hedwig te Molder
    2005Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Potter, Jonathan and Margaret Wetherell
    1987Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Psathas, George
    2004 “Alfred Schutz’s influence on American sociologists and sociology.” Human Studies27(1): 1–35. 10.1023/B:HUMA.0000012249.47522.56
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUMA.0000012249.47522.56 [Google Scholar]
  133. Putnam, Linda L. and Anne M. Nicotera
    2009Building Theories of Organization: The Constitutive Role of Communication. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203891025
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891025 [Google Scholar]
  134. Rabinow, Paul and William M. Sullivan
    1987Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Ritzer, George and Jeffrey Stepnisky
    2018Classical Sociological Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Robinson, Jeffrey D.
    2003 “An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients’ participation.” Health Communication15: 27–59. 10.1207/S15327027HC1501_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1501_2 [Google Scholar]
  137. Rorty, Richard
    1967The Linguistic Turn. Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  138. 1979Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Sacks, Harvey and Emanuel A. Schegloff
    1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and their Interaction.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. byGeorge Psathas. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language50: 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  141. Sacks, Harvey
    1963 “Sociological description.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology8: 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  142. 1972 “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics, ed. byJohn J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 329–345. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  143. 1984 “Notes on Methodology.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1972 “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.” InStudies in Social Interaction, ed. byDavid N. Sudnow. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  145. 1987 “Between Micro and Macro: Context and Other Connections.” InThe Micro-Macro Link, ed. byJeffrey Alexander. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  146. 1992 “In Another Context.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. byAlessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 193–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  147. 1997 “Whose text? Whose context?” Discourse & Society8(2): 165–187. 10.1177/0957926597008002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008002002 [Google Scholar]
  148. 2006 “Interaction: The Infrastructure for Social Institutions, the Natural Ecological Niche for Language and the Arena in which Culture is Enacted.” InThe Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. byNicholas J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 70–96. New York: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  149. Schutz, Alfred and Thomas Luckmann
    1973The Structures of the Life-World. Evanston, IL: Nothwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  150. Schutz, Alfred
    1962Collected Papers, Vol. I. The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  151. 1964Collected papers, Vol. II. Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  152. 1967 [1932]The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  153. 1970Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  154. Searle, John R.
    1969Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  155. Silverman, David
    1987Communication and Medical Practice. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Stati, Sorin
    1982II dialogo. Considerazioni di linguistica pragmatica. Napoli: Liguori.
    [Google Scholar]
  157. Stivers, Tanya
    2006 “Treatment Decisions: Negotiations between Doctors and Patients in Acute Care Encounters”. InCommunication in Medical Care, ed. byJohn Heritage and Douglas J. Maynard, 279–321. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607172.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.012 [Google Scholar]
  158. Streeck, Jurgen, Charles Goodwin and Curtis LeBaron
    2011Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  159. Streeck, Jurgen
    2010 “New Adventures in Language and Social Interaction”. InNew Adventures in Language and Social Interaction, ed. byJurgen Streeck, 1–8. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.196.01str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.196.01str [Google Scholar]
  160. 2011 “The Changing Meanings of Things: Found Objects and Inscriptions in Social Interaction.” InEmbodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, edited byJurgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin and Curtis LeBaron, 67–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  161. Throop, Jason C.
    2018 “Being Open to the World.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory8(1/2): 197–210. 10.1086/698271
    https://doi.org/10.1086/698271 [Google Scholar]
  162. Tracy, Karen
    2002Everyday Talk. Building and Reflecting Identities. NewYork/London: Guilford.
    [Google Scholar]
  163. 2009 “How questioning construct judge identities: Oral argument about same-sex marriage.” Discourse Studies11(2): 199–221. 10.1177/1461445608100944
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608100944 [Google Scholar]
  164. Tyryakian, Edward A.
    1973 “Sociology and Existential Phenomenology.” InPhenomenology and the Social Sciences, ed. byMaurice Natanson, 187–222. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  165. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2006 “Discourse, context and cognition.” Discourse Studies8(1): 159–177. 10.1177/1461445606059565
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059565 [Google Scholar]
  166. Vasilyeva, Alena L.
    2017 “Strategic maneuvering in dispute mediation.” Argumentation and Advocacy53(3): 234–251. 10.1080/00028533.2017.1341452
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2017.1341452 [Google Scholar]
  167. Vasilyeva, Alena
    2012 “Argumentation in the context of mediation activity.” Journal of Argumentation in context. 1(2): 209–233. 10.1075/jaic.1.2.04vas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.2.04vas [Google Scholar]
  168. Vygotsky, Lev S.
    1962 [1934]Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press. 10.1037/11193‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-000 [Google Scholar]
  169. 1978 “Interaction between Learning and Development.” InMind in Society, ed. byMichael Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner and Ellen Souberman, 79–91. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  170. Weigand, Edda
    2009Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  171. 2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  172. 2018The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  173. Wertsch, James V.
    1985Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  174. 1991Voices of the Mind. Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  175. Whorf, Benjamin L.
    1956Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  176. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1958Philosophical Investigati2ons, ed. byGertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe and Rush Rhees; translated byGertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  177. Wodak, Ruth
    (ed.) 1989Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ct.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ct.7 [Google Scholar]
  178. Wright Mills, Charles
    1940 “Situated action and vocabularies of motive.” American Sociological Review5: 904–913. 10.2307/2084524
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2084524 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00029.orl
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error