1887
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study analyzes judges’ decision announcements at the end of small claims hearings when the judge informs the parties who has won. Background on US small claims courts is provided, and the data and grounded practical theory, the analytic approach, are described. Then, we overview the small claims decision announcement genre, describe key areas of variation among judges, and identify and explicate a recurring problem built into the design of small claims proceedings. Cases that pit what is legally correct against what commonsense fairness dictates can be troublesome for judges and this trouble is marked discursively in judge announcements. The paper concludes by describing the challenge this raises for the development of grounded practical theory.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00032.tra
2019-07-05
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    1986Speech Genres and Other Late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Best, Arthur, Deborah Zalense, Kathleeen Bridges and Kathryn Chenoweth
    1993 “Peace, wealth, happiness and small claim courts: A case study.” Fordham Urban Law Journal21 (2): 343–379.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatia, Vijay K.
    1993Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  5. Conley, John M. and William M. O’Barr
    1990Rules versus Relationships. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Craig, Robert T. and Karen Tracy
    1995 “Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion.” Communication Theory5: 248–272. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2885.1995.tb00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1995.tb00108.x [Google Scholar]
  7. 2014 “Building grounded practical theory in applied communication research: Introduction to the special issue.” Journal of Applied Communication Research42 (3): 229–243. doi:  10.1080/00909882.2014.916410
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.916410 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ewick, Patrick and Susan S. Silbey
    1998The Commonplace of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226212708.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226212708.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Garzone, Giuliana E.
    2015 “Genre analysis.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. byKaren Tracy, Cornelia Ilie and Todd L. Sandel, 677–693. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi069
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi069 [Google Scholar]
  10. Goerdt, John A.
    1992Small Claims and Traffic Court: Case Management Procedures, Case characteristics, and Outcomes in 12 Urban Districts. Williamsburg, VA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hafner, Christoph A.
    2010 “A multiperspective genre analysis of the barrister’s opinion: Writing context, generic structure, and textualization.” Written Communication27 (4): 410–444. doi:  10.1177/0741088310377272
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088310377272 [Google Scholar]
  12. Han, Zhengrui
    2011 “The discursive construction of civil judgments in Mainland China.” Discourse and Society22 (6): 743–765. doi:  10.1177/0957926511419924
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419924 [Google Scholar]
  13. Livermore, Michael A., Allen B. Riddell and Daniel N. Rockmore
    2017 “The Supreme Court and the judicial genre.” Arizona Law Review59: 837–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rohl, Klaus F.
    1990 “Small claims in civil court proceedings in the Federal Republic of Germany.” InSmall Claims Courts, ed. byChristopher J. Whelan, 167–181. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ruhnka, John C. and Steven Weller
    1978Small Claims Courts: A National Examination. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Steele, Eric H.
    1981 “The historical context of small claims courts.” Law and Social Inquiry6 (2): 293–376. Retrieved fromhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/828089
    [Google Scholar]
  17. The Small Claims Study Group
    The Small Claims Study Group 1972Little Injustices: Small Claims and the American Consumer. Washington, DC: Center for Auto Safety.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tracy, Karen and Mary Caron
    2017 “How the language style of small claims judges does ideological work.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology36 (3): 321–342. doi:  10.1177/0261927X16652191
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X16652191 [Google Scholar]
  19. Tracy, Karen and Danielle Hodge
    2018 “Judge discourse moves that enact and endanger procedural justice.” Discourse and Society29 (1): 63–85. doi:  10.1177/0957926517726112
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517726112 [Google Scholar]
  20. Tyler, Tom R.
    1988 “What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures.” Law and Society Review22 (1): 103–136. doi:  10.2307/3053563
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3053563 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2007 “Procedural justice and the courts.” Court Review44(1/2): 26–31. Retrieved fromaja.ncsc.dni.us/publications/courtrv/cr44-1/CR44-1-2Tyler.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Weller, Steven, John C. Ruhnka and John A. Martin
    1990 “American small claims courts.” InSmall Claims Courts, ed. byChristopher J. Whelan, 5–23. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00032.tra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00032.tra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dilemma , discourse analysis , genre , grounded practical theory , judge language and small claims court
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error