Assessing a (gifted) child in parent-teacher conference

References

1. Addimando, Loredana
   2013 “I comportamenti controproducenti dei genitori a scuola: un’analisi sulla soddisfazione e l’autonomia lavorativa degli insegnanti” [Counterproductive behavior of parents at school: a satisfaction analysis and teacher’s autonomy in working life]. Psicologia della Salute2: 33–51. 10.3280/PDS2013‑002004
   https://doi.org/10.3280/PDS2013-002004 [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, Carolyn and Jayne Keogh
   1995 “Accounting for Achievement in Parent-Teacher Interviews.” Human Studies18(2–3): 263–300. 10.1007/BF01323213
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323213 [Google Scholar]
3. Bergen, Clara and Tanya Stivers
   2013 “Patient Disclosure of Medical Misdeeds.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior54(2): 221–240. 10.1177/0022146513487379
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146513487379 [Google Scholar]
4. Bronfenbrenner, Urie
   1979 The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bronfenbrenner, Urie
   1986 “Ecology of the Family as a Context for Human Development: Research Perspective.” Developmental Psychology22(6): 723–742. 10.1037/0012‑1649.22.6.723
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723 [Google Scholar]
6. Brody, E. Linda and Carol J. Mills
   1997 “Gifted Children whit Learning Disabilities: a Review of the Issues.” US National Library of Medicine30(3): 282–296.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Caffi, Claudia
   1999 “On Mitigation”. Journal of Pragmatics31(7): 881–909. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00098‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00098-8 [Google Scholar]
8. Caronia, Letizia and Chiara Dalledonne Vandini
   2018 “Voicing a Gifted Child: Reported Speech as Resource for doing Epistemic and Moral Work in Parent-teacher Conference.” Unpublished paper presented at68th Annual ICA Conference – Voices, Prague, CZ.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cedersund, Elisabet and Lennart G. Svensson
   1996 “A “Good” or a “Bad” Student: A Study of Communication in Class Assessment Meetings.” Language and Education10 (1): 132–150. 10.1080/09500789608666705
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789608666705 [Google Scholar]
10. Christenson, Sandra and Susan M. Sheridan
    2001 Schools and Families. Creating Essential Connection for Learning. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Drew, Paul and John Heritage
    1992 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Epstein, L. Joyce
    1983 Friends in School. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Epstein, L. Joyce and Caren K. Salinas
    2004 “Partnering with Families and Communities. A Well-organized Program of Family and Community Partnerships Yields many Benefits for Schools and their Students.” Schools as Learning Community61(8): 12–18.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fabbri, Maurizio
    2012a Il transfert, il dono, la cura. [The transfert, the gjft and the care]. Milano: Franco Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fabbri, Maurizio
    2012b “Ragioni d’alleanza, problemi di disalleanza: territori e servizi per l’infanzia fra cultura e controcultura.” [Reasons for alliance, problems of dis-alliance: territories and services for children between culture and counterculture]. InDis-alleanze nei contesti educativi [Dis-alliances in educational contexts], ed. byMariagrazia Contini, 63–75. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fraser, Bruce
    1980 “Conversational Mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics4: 341–250. 10.1016/0378‑2166(80)90029‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(80)90029-6 [Google Scholar]
17. Fraser, Bruce
    2010 “Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging.” InNew Approaches to Hedging, ed. byGunther, Kaltenbock, Wiltrud, Mihatsch and Stefan Schneider, 15–34. Bingley, West Yorkshire: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 10.1163/9789004253247_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253247_003 [Google Scholar]
18. Garcia-Sanchez, Inmaculada and Marjorie F. Orellana
    2006 “The Construction of Moral and Social Identity in Immigrant Children’s Narratives-in-Translation.” Linguistic and Education17: 209–239. 10.1016/j.linged.2006.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.07.001 [Google Scholar]
19. Gill, Virginia and Douglas W. Maynard
    1995 “On ‘Labeling’ in Actual Interaction: Delivering and Receiving Diagnosis of Developmental Disabilities”. Social Problems43(1): 11–37. 10.1017/CBO9780511607172.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.007 [Google Scholar]
20. Goodwin, Charles
    1994 “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist96(3): 606–633. 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
21. Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    1992 “Assessments and the Construction of Context”. InRethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. byAlessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 147–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Granata, Anna, Ouejdane, Mejeri and Federica Rizzi
    2015 “Non è solo questione di cultura. Fattori di ostacolo e risorsa nella relazione famiglia-scuola dell’infanzia.” [Is not only a question of culture. Obstacles and resources in the family/childhood school relationship]. Rivista dell’Educazione Famigliare [Family education magazine] 1: 79–91.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Greenfield, M. Patricia, Blanca Quiroz and Catherine Raeff
    2000 “Cross-Cultural Conflict and Harmony in the Social Construction of the Child.” New Direction for Child and Adolescent Development87: 93–108. 10.1002/cd.23220008708
    https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23220008708 [Google Scholar]
24. Heritage, John
    2004 “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analyzing Data.” InQualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, ed. byDavid Silverman, 223–245. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Heritage, John
    2012a “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 1–29. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
26. Heritage, John
    2012b “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 30–52. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
27. Heritage, John and Steven Clayman
    2010 Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1002/9781444318135
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
28. Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Sequences.” Social Psychology Quarterly68: 15–38. 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
29. Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond
    2006 “The Epistemics of Social Relationships: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society35(5): 677–705. 10.1017/S0047404506060325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
30. Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond
    2012 “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. byJan P. De Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139045414.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.013 [Google Scholar]
31. Howard, M. Kathryn and Sarah Lipinoga
    2010 “Closing down Openings: Pretextuality and Misunderstanding in Parent-Teacher Conferences with Mexican Immigrant Families.” Language and Communication30(1): 33–47. 10.1016/j.langcom.2009.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.10.004 [Google Scholar]
32. Horvat, Erin, Elliot B. Weininger and Annette Lareau
    2003 “From Social Ties to Social Capital: Class Differences in the Relations between Home and School and Parents Networks.” American Educational Research Journal40(2): 319–351. 10.3102/00028312040002319
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040002319 [Google Scholar]
33. Jefferson, Gail and John R. E. Lee
    1981 “The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles-Telling’ and a ‘Service Encounter’.” Journal of Pragmatics5(5): 399–422. 10.1016/0378‑2166(81)90026‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6 [Google Scholar]
34. Jefferson, Gail
    1984 “Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgment Tokens ‘Yeah’ and ‘Mmhm’.” Paper in Linguistics17(2): 197–216. 10.1080/08351818409389201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389201 [Google Scholar]
35. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. ByG. H. Lerner, 13–23. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
36. Kim, M. Elizabeth, Susan M. Sheridan, Kyongboon Kwon and Natalie Koziol
    2013 “Parents Beliefs and Children Behavioral Functioning: The Mediating Role of Parent-Teacher Relationship.” Journal of Psychology51(2): 175–185.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kotthoff, Helga
    2015 “Narrative Constructions of School-Oriented Parenthood during Parent-Teacher-conferences.” Linguistics and Education31: 286–303. 10.1016/j.linged.2014.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.12.002 [Google Scholar]
38. Lareau, Annette and Elliot B. Weininger
    2003 “Cultural Capital in Educational Research: A Critical Assessment.” Theory and Society32(5): 567–606. 10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004951.04408.b0
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004951.04408.b0 [Google Scholar]
39. Lawrence-Lightfoot, Sara
    2003 The Essential Conversation: What Parent and Teachers can Learn from Each Other. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
40. MacLure, Maggie and Barbara M. Walker
    2000 “Disenchanted Evenings: the Social Organization of Talk in Parent-teacher Consultations in UK Secondary Schools.” British Journal of Sociology of Education21(1): 5–25. 10.1080/01425690095135
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690095135 [Google Scholar]
41. Maynard, Douglas W.
    1992 “On Clinicians Co-implicating Recipients’ Perspective in the Delivery of Diagnostic News.” InTalk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 331–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Maynard, Douglas W.
    2003 Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Maynard, Douglas W. and John Heritage
    2005 “Conversation Analysis, Doctor-Patient Interaction and Media Communication.” Medical Education39: 428–435. 10.1111/j.1365‑2929.2005.02111.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02111.x [Google Scholar]
44. Milani, Paola
    2009 “La formazione e la ricerca in educazione familiare. Stato dell’arte in Italia” [Formation and research in family education. State of art in Italy]. Rivista Italiana dell’Educazione Familiare1: 17–35.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Milani, Paola
    2012 “Sconfinamenti e Connessioni. Per una nuova geografia dei rapporti fra scuole e famiglie” [Crossing borders and connections. For a new geography of relations between schools and families]. Rivista Italiana di Educazione Famigliare1: 25–37.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Orletti, Franca
    2000 La Conversazione Diseguale [The Unequal Conversation]. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Orletti, Franca and Marilena Fatigante
    2009 “La modulazione dell’agency nell’interazione in colloqui di consultazione pedagogica” [The agency modulation in the interaction in psychological consultation interviews]. InFenomeni di intensità linguistica [Phenomena of linguistic intensity], ed. byBarbara Gili Favela and Carla Bazzanella, 195–206. Firenze: Franco Cesati Editore.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Pfeiffer, I. Steven and Yaacov Petscher
    2008 “Identifying Young Gifted Children Using the Gifted Rating Scales-Preschool/Kindergarten Form.” Gifted Child Quarterly52(1): 19–29. 10.1177/0016986207311055
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207311055 [Google Scholar]
49. Pillet-Shore, Danielle
    2001 “Doing pretty well: How Teachers Manage the Interactional Environment of Unfavorable Student Evaluation in Parent-Teacher Conference.” Unpublished Master’s thesis. Los Angeles: University of California.
50. Pillet-Shore, Danielle
    2003 “Doing Okay: On the Multiple Metrics of an Assessment.” Research on Language and Social Interaction36(3): 285–319. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_03
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_03 [Google Scholar]
51. Pillet-Shore, Danielle
    2012 “The Problems with Praise in Parent–Teacher Interaction.” Communication Monographs79: 181–204. 10.1080/03637751.2012.672998
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.672998 [Google Scholar]
52. Pillet-Shore, Danielle
    2015 “Being a Good Parent in Parent-Teacher Conferences”. Journal of Communication65(2): 373–395. 10.1111/jcom.12146
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12146 [Google Scholar]
53. Pillet-Shore, Danielle
    2016 “Criticizing Another Child: How Teachers Evaluate Students During Parent-Teacher Conference.” Language and Society45: 33–58. 10.1017/S0047404515000809
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000809 [Google Scholar]
54. Pomerantz, Anita
    1986 “Extreme Case Formulation: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies9: 219–229. 10.1007/BF00148128
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
55. Sacks, Harvey
    1974 “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” InEthnomethodology: Selected readings, ed. byRoy Turner, 216–232. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Schegloff, Emmanuel A.
    1996 “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics.” InStudies in Anaphora, ed. byBarbara Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.33.14sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.33.14sch [Google Scholar]
57. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007b “Conveying Who You are: The Presentation of Self, Strictly Speaking.”. In. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. ByJohn N. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 123–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Subotnik, Rena, Paula Olszewski-Kubilius and Frank C. Worrell
    2011 “Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest12(1): 3–54. 10.1177/1529100611418056
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056 [Google Scholar]
59. Stevanovic, Melisa and Anssi Peräkylä
    2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45(3): 297–321. 10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260 [Google Scholar]
60. Zanetti, Maria Assunta
    2012 Bambini e ragazzi ad alto potenziale. Una guida per educatori e famiglie [Children and young with high potential. A guide for educators and families]. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]