1887
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to determine whether humour can be used as a discursive strategy to reply to offensive humour about natural disasters and what purpose it serves. A corpus of 431 replies to the Charlie Hebdo cartoons concerning the earthquake in central Italy in August 2016 was analysed. Depending on the target of the humour in these replies, they were used to agree, disagree or deflect away from the offensive and aggressive content of the cartoons. The results show that humour can be used as a discursive strategy to respond to offensive humour. Moreover, an analysis of the corpus revealed that humorous replies were used mainly to agree rather than disagree with the cartoons.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00039.can
2019-07-12
2019-09-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Apter, Michael J.
    (ed.) 2001Motivational Styles in Everyday Life: A Guide to Reversal Theory. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10427‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10427-000 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2014 “Towards a Theory of Things: Reversal Theory and Design.” Journal of Motivation, Emotion, and Personality2(2): 3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Attardo, Salvatore
    1994Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1997 “The Semantic Foundations of Cognitive Theories of Humor.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research10(4): 395–420. 10.1515/humr.1997.10.4.395
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1997.10.4.395 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2001Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110887969
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887969 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2002 “Humor and Irony in Interaction. From Mode Adoption to Failure of Detection.” InSay not to Say: New Perspectives on Misscommunication, ed. byLuigi Anolli, Rita Ciceri, and Giuseppe Riva, 159–179). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Attardo, Salvatore, Christian F. Hempelmann, and Sara Di Maio
    2002 “Script oppositions and Logical Mechanisms: Modeling Incongruities and their Resolutions.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research15(1): 1–44. 10.1515/humr.2002.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2002.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Attardo, Salvatore
    2017 “The General Theories of Verbal Humor.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. bySalvatore Attardo, 126–142. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-10 [Google Scholar]
  9. Attardo, Salvatore and Victor Raskin
    1991 “Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research4(3/4): 293–347.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Beermann, Ursula
    2014 “Sick Humor.” InEncyclopedia of Humor Studies, ed. bySalvatore Attardo, 691–693. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bell, Nancy D.
    2014 “Reactions to Humor, non-laughter.” InEncyclopedia of Humor Studies, ed. bySalvatore Attardo, 628–629. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bianchi, Ivana, Carla Canestrari, Anna Maria Roncoroni, Roberto Burro, Erika Branchini, and Ugo Savardi
    2017 “The Effects of Modulating Contrast in Verbal Irony as a Cue for Giftedness.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research30(4), 383–415. doi:  10.1515/humor‑2017‑0028
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2017-0028 [Google Scholar]
  13. Billig, Michael
    2005Laughter and Ridicule: Toward a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bongelli, Ramona, Carla Canestrari, Ilaria Riccioni, Andrzej Zuczkowski, Cinzia Buldorini, Ricardo Pietrobon, Alberto Lavelli, and Bernardo Magnini
    2012 “A Corpus of Scientific Biomedical Texts Spanning over 168 years annotated for Uncertainty.” InProceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation LREC 2012, ed. byNicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Mehmet Uğur Doğan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, A. Moreno, Jan Odijk, and Stelios Piperidis 2009–2014 Istanbul: European Language Resources Association – ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bowes, Andrea and Albert N. Katz
    2011 “When Sarcasm stings.” Discourse Processes48, 215–236. 10.1080/0163853X.2010.532757
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2010.532757 [Google Scholar]
  16. Burgers, Christian and Margot van Mulken
    2017 “Humor Markers.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. bySalvatore Attardo, 385–399. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑27
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-27 [Google Scholar]
  17. Canestrari, Carla
    2010 “Meta-communicative Signals and Humorous Verbal Interchanges: A Case Study.” Humor-International Journal of Humor Research23(3), 327–349. 10.1515/humr.2010.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2010.015 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2012 “A Model of Humor Syntony: From Failed to Successful Humor in Interaction.” InHumor and Health Promotion, ed. byPaola Gremigni, 59–77. New York: Nova Sciences. doi:  10.1515/humr.2010.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2010.015 [Google Scholar]
  19. Canestrari, Carla, Alberto Dionigi, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
    2014 “Humor Understanding and Knowledge.” Language and Dialogue4, 261–283. doi:  10.1075/ld.4.2.05can
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.2.05can [Google Scholar]
  20. Canestrari, Carla, Erika Branchini, Ivana Bianchi, Ugo Savardi, and Roberto Burro
    2018 “Pleasures of the Mind: What Makes Jokes and Insight Problems Enjoyable.” Frontiers in Psychology8, 2297. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02297
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02297 [Google Scholar]
  21. Chandler, Marilyn R.
    1988 “Healthy Irreverence: Humor in Stories of Illness.” Humor-International Journal of Humor Research1(3), 299–305. 10.1515/humr.1988.1.3.299
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1988.1.3.299 [Google Scholar]
  22. Davies, Catherine E.
    2003 “How English-learners Joke with Native Speakers: An Interactional Sociolinguistic Perspective on Humor as Collaborative Discourse across Cultures.” Journal of Pragmatics35, 1361–1385. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00181‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00181-9 [Google Scholar]
  23. Davies, Christie
    2011Jokes and Targets. Bloomington, Indiana USA: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dionigi, Alberto and Carla Canestrari
    2016 “Clowning in Health Care Settings: The Point of View of Adults.” Europe’s Journal of Psychology12(3), 473–488. 10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1107
    https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1107 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2018a “The Role of Laughter in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: Case Studies.” Discourse Studies20(3), 323–339. doi:  10.1177/1461445618754426
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618754426 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2018b “The Use of Humour by Therapists and Clients in Cognitive Therapy.” European Journal of Humour Research6(3), 50–67. doi:  10.7592/EJHR2018.6.3.dionigi
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2018.6.3.dionigi [Google Scholar]
  27. Dynel, Marta
    2011 “Joker in the Pack. Towards Determining the Status of Humorous Framing in Conversations.” InThe Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. byMarta Dynel, 217–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.210.15dyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.210.15dyn [Google Scholar]
  28. 2013 “When Does Irony Tickles the Hearer? Towards Capturing the Characteristics of Humorous Irony.” InDevelopments in Linguistic Humour Theory, ed. byMarta Dynel, 289–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/thr.1.14dyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.14dyn [Google Scholar]
  29. Eisterhold, Jodi, Salvatore Attardo, and Diana Boxer
    2006 “Reactions to Irony in Discourse: Evidence for the Least Disruption Principle.” Journal of Pragmatics38(8), 1239–1256. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  30. Forabosco, Giovannatonio, Guglielmo Gulotta, and Maria Letizia Musu
    2001Il Comportamento Spiritoso. Milan: McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Forabosco, Giovannatonio and Elisabetta Paratico
    1984 “Humor e Indici Meta Comunicazionali.” Psicologia e Società2, 17–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    2000 “Irony in Talk among Friends.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity15, 5–27. 10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862 [Google Scholar]
  33. Guimelli, Christian, Grégory Lo Monaco, and Jean-Claude Deschamps
    2010 “The Lawsuit against Charlie Hebdo and Its Effects on the Social Representation of the Muslim Community.” Revue Internationale de Psychologie Social4, 5–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hay, Jennifer
    1994 “Jocular Abuse Patterns in Mixed-group Interaction.” Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics6, 26–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hempelmann, Christian F.
    2014 “Reception of Humor.” InEncyclopedia of Humor Studies, ed. bySalvatore Attardo, 629–630. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Janicki, Karol
    2015Language and Conflict. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑38141‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-38141-5 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kuiper, Nicholas A.
    2014 “Health Benefits of Humor, Psychological.” InEncyclopedia of Humor Studies, ed. bySalvatore Attardo, 281–284. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kuipers, Giselinde
    2006Good Humor, Bad Taste. A Sociology of the Jokes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110898996
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110898996 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2015Good Humor, Bad Taste. A Sociology of the Jokes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kupfer Snider, Andrea
    1994 “Effective Responses to Offensive Comments.” Negotiation Journal10(2), 107–115. 10.1111/j.1571‑9979.1994.tb00011.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1994.tb00011.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Landis, Richard J. and Gary G. Koch
    1977 “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics33, 159–174. 10.2307/2529310
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  42. McGhee, Paul E.
    1972 “On the Cognitive Origins of Incongruity Humor: Fantasy Assimilation versus Reality Assimilation.” InThe Psychology of Humour, ed. byJeffrey H. Goldstein and Paul E. McGhee, 61–80. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑288950‑9.50009‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50009-2 [Google Scholar]
  43. McGraw, Peter A., Caleb Warren, Lawrence E. Williams, and Bridget Leonard
    2012 “Too Close for Comfort, or Too Far to Care? Finding Humor in Distant Tragedies and Close Mishaps.” Psychological Science23(10), 1215–1223. 10.1177/0956797612443831
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443831 [Google Scholar]
  44. McGraw, Peter A., Lawrence E. Williams, and Caleb Warren
    2013 “The Rise and Fall of Humor. Psychological Distance Modulates Humorous Responses to Tragedy.” Social Psychological and Personality Science5(5), 566–572. 10.1177/1948550613515006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613515006 [Google Scholar]
  45. Morreall, John
    1983Taking Laughter Seriously. New York: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2008 “Applications of Humor: Health, the Workplace, and Education.” InThe Primer of Humor Research, ed. byVictor Raskin, 449–478. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198492.449
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198492.449 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mulkay, Michael
    1988On Humour. Its Nature and Its Place in Modern Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Pexman, Penny M., Lenka Zdrazilova, Devon McConnachie, D., Kirby Deater-Deckard, and Stephen A. Petrill
    2009 “‘That Was Smooth, Mom’: Children’s Production of Verbal and Gestural Irony.” Metaphor and Symbol24, 237–248. 10.1080/10926480903310286
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480903310286 [Google Scholar]
  49. Raskin, Victor
    1985Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht and Boston, MA: Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Robinson, Vera M.
    1991Humor and the Health Professions: the Therapeutic Use of Humor in Health Care. New Jersey: Slack.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Ruch, Willibald
    1992 “Assessment of Appreciation of Humor: Studies with the 3 WD Humor Test.” InAdvances in Personality Assessment (Vol. 9), ed. byCharles Donald Spielberger, and James Neal Butcher, 27–72. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Ruch, Willibald, Salvatore Attardo, and Victor Raskin
    1993 “Toward an Empirical Verification of the General Theory of Verbal Humor.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research6, 123–136. 10.1515/humr.1993.6.2.123
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.2.123 [Google Scholar]
  53. Ruch, Willibald and Sigrid Rath
    1993 “The Nature of Humor Appreciation: Toward an Integration of Perception of Stimulus Properties and Affective Experience.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research6(4), 363–384. 10.1515/humr.1993.6.4.363
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.4.363 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ryan, Cynthia A.
    1997 “Reclaiming the Body: The Subversive Possibilities of Breast Cancer Humor.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research10(2), 187–205. 10.1515/humr.1997.10.2.187
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1997.10.2.187 [Google Scholar]
  55. Tsakona, Villy
    2009 “Language and Image Interaction in Cartoons: Towards a Multimodal Theory of Humor.” Journal of Pragmatics41, 1171–1188. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  56. Viana, Amadeu
    2017 “Dualities in Humour. Incongruity Meets Ridicule.” Israeli Journal of Humor Research6(1), 7–38. www.israeli-humor-studies.org/122789/Published-Issues-1
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Watts, Richard J.
    1989 “Comic Strips and Theories of Communication.” Word & Image5(2), 173–180. 10.1080/02666286.1989.10435400
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02666286.1989.10435400 [Google Scholar]
  58. Whalen, Juanita M. and Penny M. Pexman
    2010 “How Do Children Respond to Verbal Irony in Face-to-face Communication? The Development of Mode Adoption across Middle Childhood.” Discourse Processes47, 363–387. 10.1080/01638530903347635
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903347635 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2017 “Humor Support and Mode Adoption.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. bySalvatore Attardo, 371–384. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑26
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-26 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ziv, Avner
    1984Personality and Sense of Humor. New York: Springer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00039.can
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00039.can
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error