1887
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The current study adopts a dialogue-analytic approach to the examination of complaint behavior in Saudi Arabic as spoken in the Najd region, the central region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. To this end, role-plays with 120 Saudi nationals who are Najdi-speakers were recorded and transcribed. Statistical comparisons revealed that Najdis used a variety of complaint strategies with requests for repair, expressing annoyance and providing modified blame being the most frequent. Najdis also produced a large number of initiators and internal and external modifiers, mainly to mitigate the negative force of complaints. Although a small influence was found for gender, the variables of age, social distance and social dominance showed a strong influence on the Najdis’ complaint behavior. The results are discussed in light of relevant theoretical models and the existing literature.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00041.eld
2019-07-12
2019-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Khawaldeh, Nisreen
    2016 “A pragmatic cross-cultural study of complaints expressions in Jordan and England.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature5(5): 197–207. 10.7575//aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.197
    https://doi.org/10.7575//aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.197 [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Shorman, Ra’ed A.
    2016 “Saudi and Jordanian undergraduates’ complaining strategies: A comparative intralanguage educational linguistic study.” Arab World English Journal7(1): 203–228. 10.24093/awej/vol7no1.14
    https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no1.14 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bikmen, Ahmet and Leyla Marti
    2013 “A study of complaint speech acts in Turkish learners of English.” Education and Science38(170): 253–265.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, Yuan-Shan, Chun-Yin D. Chen and Miao-Hsia Chang
    2011 “American and Chinese complaints: Strategy use from a cross-cultural perspective.” Intercultural Pragmatics8(2): 253–275. 10.1515/iprg.2011.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.012 [Google Scholar]
  6. Grein, Marion
    2017 “How culture affects language and dialogue.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 347–366. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall, Edward T.
    1976Beyond culture. New York, USA: Anchor Brooks/Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hartley, Laura
    1998 “A sociolinguistic analysis of face-threat and face-management in potential complaint situations.” Faculty Publications – Department of World Languages, Sociology and Cultural Studies. Paper 14. digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/lang_fac/14
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hofstede, Geert H.
    2001Culture’s consequence: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kakolaki, Leila Nasiri and Mohsen Shahrokhi
    2016 “Gender differences in complaint strategies among Iranian upper intermediate EFL students.” Studies in English Language Teaching4(1): 1–15. 10.22158/selt.v4n1p1
    https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v4n1p1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Kozlova, Iryna
    2004 “Can you complain? Cross-cultural comparison of indirect complaints in Russian and American English.” Prospect19(1): 84–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee, Cynthia
    2012 “Mum, sister hit me”: Interlanguage complaint strategies of Cantonese learners of English from childhood to their teens.” International Review of Pragmatics4(1): 80–109. 10.1163/187731012X632072
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187731012X632072 [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, Rui and Raja R. R. Suleiman
    2017 “Language proficiency and the speech act of complaint of Chinese EFL learners.” 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies23(1): 60–74. 10.17576/3L‑2017‑2301‑05
    https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-05 [Google Scholar]
  14. Meinl, Marja E.
    2010 Electronic complaints: An empirical study on British English and German complaints on eBay. Doctoral thesis at theUniversity of Bonn, Germany. Retrieved fromhss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/2010/2122/2122.pdf
  15. Migdadi, Fathi, Muhammad A. Badarneh and Kawakib R. Momani
    2012 “Public complaints and complaint responses in calls to a Jordanian radio phone-in program.” Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 321–341. 10.1093/applin/ams011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams011 [Google Scholar]
  16. Moskala-Gallaher, Beata
    2011 The speech act of complaint in English and in Russian and its emergence in the pragmatic competence of adult American learners of Russian. Doctoral thesis atBryn Mawr College, USA. Retrieved fromhttps://repository.brynmawr.edu/dissertations/68/
  17. Olshtain, Elite and Liora Weinbach
    1993 “Interlanguage features of the speech act of complaining.” InInterlanguage Pragmatics, ed. byG. Kasper and S. Blum-Kulka. 108–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schneider, Klaus P.
    2010 “Variational pragmatics.” InVariation and Change: Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. byMirjan Fried, Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.6.18sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.6.18sch [Google Scholar]
  19. Schneider, Klaus P. and Anne Barron
    2008 “Where pragmatics and dialectology meet: Introducing variational pragmatics.” InVariational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages, ed. byKlaus P. Schneider and Anne Barron, 1–32. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.178.02sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.178.02sch [Google Scholar]
  20. Trosborg, Anna
    1995Interlanguage pragmatics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter and Co.. 10.1515/9783110885286
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
  21. Umar, Abdul Majeed A.
    2006 “The speech act of complaint as realized by advanced Sudanese learners of English.” Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Educational and Social Sciences and Humanities18(2): 9–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Weigand, Edda
    2009Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2010a “Language as dialogue.” Intercultural Pragmatics7(3): 505–515. 10.1515/iprg.2010.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.022 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2010bDialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2015 “Dialogue in the stream of life.” Language and Dialogue5(2): 197–223. 10.1075/ld.5.2.01wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.2.01wei [Google Scholar]
  26. 2017 “The mixed game model: A holistic theory.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Weigand, Edda and Istvan Kecskes
    (eds) 2018From Pragmatics to Dialogue. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.31
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31 [Google Scholar]
  28. Yuan, Zhou-min and Runhan Zhang
    2018 “Investigating longitudinal pragmatic development of complaints made by Chinese EFL learners.” Applied Linguistics Review9(1): 63–87. 10.1515/applirev‑2016‑1017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1017 [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang, De
    2001 The speech act of complaining: A cross-cultural comparative study of Chinese and American English speakers. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. Paper 16213.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00041.eld
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00041.eld
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): complaint , Mixed Game Model , Saudi Arabic , speech act and variational pragmatics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error