Parental strategies in argumentative dialogues with their children at mealtimes

References

1. Arcidiacono, Francesco and Antonio Bova
   2015 “Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives at mealtimes: Differences and similarities in children of 3–5 and 6–9 years old.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction6: 40–55. 10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.03.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.03.002 [Google Scholar]
2. Arcidiacono, Francesco and Antonio Bova
   2017 Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑59084‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59084-4 [Google Scholar]
3. Arcidiacono, Francesco and Clotilde Pontecorvo
   2009 “Verbal conflict as a cultural practice in Italian family interactions between parents and preadolescents.” European Journal of Psychology of Education24(1): 97–117. 10.1007/BF03173477
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173477 [Google Scholar]
4. Aukrust, Vibeke
   2002 “‘What did you do in school today?’ Speech genres and tellability in multiparty family mealtime conversations in two cultures.” InTalking to Adults, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka and Catherine E. Snow , 55–84. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
   1997 Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bova, Antonio
   2015a “Adult as a source of expert opinion in child’s argumentation during family mealtime conversations.” Journal of Argumentation in Context4(1): 4–20. 10.1075/jaic.4.1.01bov
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.4.1.01bov [Google Scholar]
7. Bova, Antonio
   2015b “This is the cheese bought by Grandpa.” A study of the arguments from authority used by parents with their children during mealtimes.” Journal of Argumentation in Context4(2): 133–157. 10.1075/jaic.4.2.01bov
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.4.2.01bov [Google Scholar]
8. Bova, Antonio
   2015c “Children’s responses in argumentative discussions relating to parental rules and prescriptions.” Ampersand2: 109–121. 10.1016/j.amper.2015.08.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.08.002 [Google Scholar]
9. Bova, Antonio
   2019 The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑030‑20457‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20457-0 [Google Scholar]
10. Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
    2013a “Invoking the authority of feelings as a strategic maneuver in family mealtime conversations.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology23(3): 206–224. 10.1002/casp.2113
    https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2113 [Google Scholar]
11. Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
    2013b “Investigating children’s Why-questions. A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function.” Discourse Studies15(6): 713–734. 10.1177/1461445613490013
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613490013 [Google Scholar]
12. Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
    2014 “You must eat the salad because it is nutritious.” Argumentative strategies adopted by parents and children in food-related discussions at mealtimes.” Appetite73: 81–94. 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.019 [Google Scholar]
13. Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
    2015 “Beyond conflicts. Origin and types of issues leading to argumentative discussions during family mealtimes.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict3(2): 263–288. 10.1075/jlac.3.2.02bov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.2.02bov [Google Scholar]
14. Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
    2017 “Interpersonal dynamics within argumentative interactions: An introduction.” InInterpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, ed. by Francesco Arcidiacono and Antonio Bova . New York: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑59084‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59084-4 [Google Scholar]
15. Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
    2018 “Interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children’s reactions, and topics of disagreement during mealtime conversations.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction19: 124–133. 10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.05.003 [Google Scholar]
16. Bova, Antonio , Francesco Arcidiacono , and Fabrice Clément
    2017 “The transmission of what is taken for granted in children’s socialization: The role of argumentation in family interactions.” InArgumentation across Communities of Practice: Multi-disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Cornelia Ilie and Giuliana Garzone , 259–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.10.12bov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.10.12bov [Google Scholar]
17. Brumark, Å.
    2008 “‘Eat your hamburger!’ – ‘No, I don’t want to!’ Argumentation and argumentative development in the context of dinner conversation in twenty Swedish families.” Argumentation22(2): 251–271. 10.1007/s10503‑007‑9061‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9061-z [Google Scholar]
18. Caffi, Claudia
    1999 “On mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics31(7): 881–909. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00098‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00098-8 [Google Scholar]
19. Dunn, Judy and Penny Munn
    1987 “Developmental of justification in disputes with mother and sibling.” Developmental Psychology23(6): 791–798. 10.1037/0012‑1649.23.6.791
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.6.791 [Google Scholar]
20. van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst
    2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goodwin Harness, Marjorie
    2007 “Occasioned knowledge exploration in family interaction.” Discourse and Society18(1): 93–110. 10.1177/0957926507069459
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069459 [Google Scholar]
22. Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 “The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences.” Social Psychology Quarterly68(1): 15–38. 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
23. Hester, Sally and Stephen Hester
    2010 “Conversational actions and category relations: An analysis of a children’s argument.” Discourse Studies12(1): 33–48. 10.1177/1461445609347233
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609347233 [Google Scholar]
24. Kuhn, Deanna
    1991 The Skills of Argument. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571350 [Google Scholar]
25. Laforest, Marty
    2002 “Scenes of family life: complaining in everyday conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics34(10–11): 1595–1620. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00077‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00077-2 [Google Scholar]
26. MacWhinney, Brian
    2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd edition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mead, Margaret
    1959 Four Families. Ottawa: National Film Board of Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mercier, Hugo
    2011 “Reasoning serves argumentation in children.” Cognitive Development26(3): 177–191. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.12.001 [Google Scholar]
29. Mondada, Lorenza
    2009 “The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations.” Food Quality and Preference20(8): 558–571. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.03.006 [Google Scholar]
30. Ochs, Elinor
    2006 “The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development111: 35–49. 10.1002/cd.154
    https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.154 [Google Scholar]
31. Ochs, Elinor and Merav Shohet
    2006 “The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization.” InFamily Mealtime as a Context of Development and Socialization. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development Series. Vol.11, ed. by Reed W. Larson , Kathryn R. Branscomb and Anglea R. Wiley , 35–50. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ochs, Elinor and Carolyn Taylor
    1992 “Family narrative as political activity.” Discourse and Society3(3): 301–340. 10.1177/0957926592003003003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003003003 [Google Scholar]
33. Pontecorvo, Clotilde and Francesco Arcidiacono
    2016 “The dialogic construction of justifications and arguments in a seven-year-old child within a ‘democratic’ family.” Language and Dialogue6(2): 306–328. 10.1075/ld.6.2.05pon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.2.05pon [Google Scholar]
34. Pontecorvo, Clotilde and Alessandra Fasulo
    1997 “Learning to argue in family shared discourse: The reconstruction of past events.” InDiscourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition, ed. by Lauren Resnick , Roger Säljö , Clotilde Pontecorvo , and Barbara Burge , 406–442. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑03362‑3_18
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3_18 [Google Scholar]
35. Pontecorvo, Clotilde and Alessandra Fasulo
    1999 “Planning a typical Italian meal: A family reflection on culture.” Culture Psychology5(3): 313–335. 10.1177/1354067X9953004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9953004 [Google Scholar]
36. Pontecorvo, Clotilde , Alessandra Fasulo , and Laura Sterponi
    2001 “Mutual apprentices: Making of parenthood and childhood in family dinner conversations.” Human Development44(6): 340–361. 10.1159/000046155
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000046155 [Google Scholar]
37. Pontecorvo, Clotilde and Sabine Pirchio
    2000 “A developmental view on children’s arguing: The need of the other.” Human Development43(6): 361–363. 10.1159/000022696
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000022696 [Google Scholar]
38. Pontecorvo, Clotilde and Laura Sterponi
    2002 “Learning to argue and reason through discourse in educational settings.” InLearning for Life in the 21st Century: Sociocultural Perspectives on the Future of Education, ed. by Gordon Wells and Guy Claxton , 127–140. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 10.1002/9780470753545.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753545.ch10 [Google Scholar]
39. Raymond, Geoffrey and John Heritage
    2006 “The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren.” Language in Society35(5): 677–705. 10.1017/S0047404506060325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
40. Rigotti, Eddo and Greco S. Morasso
    2009 “Argumentation as an object of interest and as a social and cultural resource.” InArgumentation and Education, ed. by Nathalie Muller-Mirza and Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont , 1–61. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑98125‑3_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_2 [Google Scholar]
41. Sarangapani, Padma M.
    2003 Constructing School Knowledge. An Ethnography of Learning in an Indian Village. New Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Slomkowski, Cheryl L. and Judy Dunn
    1992 “Arguments and relationships within the family: Differences in young children’s disputes with mother and sibling.” Developmental Psychology28(5): 919–924. 10.1037/0012‑1649.28.5.919
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.919 [Google Scholar]
43. Tulviste, Tiia , Luule Mizera , Boer De Geer , and Marja-terttu Tryggvason
    2002 “Regulatory comments as tools of family socialization: A comparison of Estonian, Swedish and Finnish mealtime interaction.” Language in Society31(5): 655–678. 10.1017/S0047404502315045
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404502315045 [Google Scholar]
44. Voss, James F. and Julie A. van Dyke
    2001 “Argumentation in psychology: Background comments.” Discourse Processes32(2–3): 89–111. 10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_01
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_01 [Google Scholar]
45. Vuchinich, Samuel
    1990 “The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict.” InConflict Talk, ed. by Allen Day Grimshaw , 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Walton, D. N.
    1997 Appeal to Expert Opinion. Arguments from Authority. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Walton, Douglas N. , Chris Reed , and Fabrizio Macagno
    2008 Argumentation Schemes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511802034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 [Google Scholar]
48. Weigand, Edda
    1999 “Rhetoric and argumentation in a dialogic perspective.” InRhetoric and Argumentation, ed. by Eddo Rigotti and Sara Cigada , 53–69. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Weigand, Edda
    2001 “Games of power.” InNegotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction, ed. by Edda Weigand and Marcelo Dascal , 63–76. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.214.06wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.214.06wei [Google Scholar]
50. Weigand, Edda
    2006 “Argumentation: The Mixed Game.” Argumentation20(1): 59–87. 10.1007/s10503‑006‑9000‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9000-4 [Google Scholar]