1887
Volume 9, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study involves an in-depth analysis of a sociolinguistic interview between the researcher and a college student in his junior year, herein named “Alex”. Within the entirety of the transcription, I conducted a detailed investigation of the interviewee’s linguistic features and strategies. He attempted to achieve several communicative goals, such as streamlining the conversation by utilizing stance taking, communication accommodation, language crossing and code switching. In this paper, I elaborate on the specific linguistic strategies he used to take a stance and construct his identity through narrative. Specifically, he created the identity of a motivated, intelligent yet humble foreign language learner.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00049.zhu
2019-10-29
2020-09-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blom, Jan-Petter and John Gumperz
    1972 “Social Meaning in Linguistic Structures: Code Switching in Northern Norway.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. byJohn Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 407–434. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burkette, Allison
    2013 “Constructing the (m)Other: A-Prefixing, Stance, and the Lessons of Motherhood.” Language in Society42: 239–258. 10.1017/S0047404513000225
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000225 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chandrasegaran, Antonia and Kah Mun Clara Kong
    2006 “Stance-taking and Stance-support in Students’ Online Forum Discussion.” Linguistics and Education17: 374–390. 10.1016/j.linged.2007.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Coupland, Justine, Nikolas Coupland, and Howard Giles
    1991Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coupland, Nikolas
    2003 “Sociolinguistic Authenticities.” Journal of Sociolinguistics7: 417–431. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00233
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00233 [Google Scholar]
  6. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 “The Stance Triangle.” InStancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. byRobert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  7. Evans, Craig
    2018 “Investigating ‘Care Leaver’ Identity: A Narrative Analysis of Personal Experience Stories.” Text and Talk39: 25–45. 10.1515/text‑2018‑2017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2018-2017 [Google Scholar]
  8. Farzadnia, Sina and Howard Giles
    2015 “Patient–provider Interaction: A Communication Accommodation Theory Perspective.” International Journal of Society, Culture and Language3: 17–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gallois, Cindy and Howard Giles
    2015 “Communication Accommodation Theory.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. byKaren Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, and Todd Sandel, 1–18. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi066
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi066 [Google Scholar]
  10. Giles, Howard and Tania Ogay
    2007 “Communication Accommodation Theory.” InExplaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars, ed. byBryan B. Whaley and Wendy Samter, 293–310, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Giles, Howard
    2009 “The Process of Communication Accommodation.” InThe New Sociolinguistics Reader, ed. byNikolas Coupland, and Adam Jaworski, 276–286. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑92299‑4_19
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-92299-4_19 [Google Scholar]
  12. Giles, Howard and Jessica Gasiorek
    2013 “Parameters of Non–accommodation: Refining and Elaborating Communication Accommodation Theory.” InSocial Cognition and Communication, ed. byJoseph Paul Forgas, Orsolya Vincze and János László, 155–172. Abingdon, UK: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall, Kira and Chad Nilep
    2015 “Code Switching, Identity and Globalization.” InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, 597–619. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hozhabrossadat, Sepideh
    2015 “Linguistic Identities: How Code-switching and/ or Code Crossing Help Constructing Solidarity or Otherness in Multilingual Societies.” International Journal of English Literature and Culture3(6): 194–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnstone, Barbara
    2009 “Stance, Style, and the Linguistic Individual.” InStance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. byAlexandra Jaffe, 29–52. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kärkkäinen, Elise
    2006 “Stance Taking in Conversation: From Subjectivity to Intersubjectivity.” Text and Talk26: 699–731. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.029
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.029 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kiesling, Scott F.
    1998 “Men’s Identities and Sociolinguistic Variation: The Case of Fraternity Men.” Journal of Sociolinguistics2: 69–99. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00031
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00031 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2001 “Stances of Whiteness and Hegemony in Fraternity Men’s Discourse.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology11: 101–115. 10.1525/jlin.2001.11.1.101
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2001.11.1.101 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2005 “Variation, Stance and Style: Word–final–er, High Rising Tone, and Ethnicity in Australian English.” English World-wide26(1): 1–42. 10.1075/eww.26.1.02kie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.26.1.02kie [Google Scholar]
  20. 2009a “Style as stance: Stance as the Explanation for Patterns of Sociolinguistic Variation.” InStance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. byAlexandra Jaffe, 171–194. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kiesling, and Scott
    2009b “Fraternity Men: Variation and Discourses of Masculinity.” InThe New Sociolinguistic Reader, ed. byNikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski, 187–200. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑92299‑4_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-92299-4_13 [Google Scholar]
  22. Labov, William
    1972Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Laury, Ritva
    2012 “Taking a Stance and Getting on with it: The Form and Function of the Finnish Finite Clausal Extraposition Construction.” Text and Talk32: 503–524. 10.1515/text‑2012‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0024 [Google Scholar]
  24. Myers-Scotton, Carol
    1983 “The Negotiation of Identities in Conversation: a Theory of Markedness and Code Choice.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language44: 115–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1993Social Motivations for Codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2009 “Code-switching.” InThe New Sociolinguistics Reader, ed. byNikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski, 473–489. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑92299‑4_33
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-92299-4_33 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ochs, Elinor and Lisa Capps
    1996 “Narrating the Self.” Annual Review of Anthropology25: 19–43. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.19
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.19 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2002Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rampton, Ben
    1999 “Crossing.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology9: 54–56. 10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1‑2.54
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.54 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2009 “Crossing, Ethnicity and Code–Switching.” Inthe New Sociolinguistics Reader, ed. byNikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski, 287–298. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑92299‑4_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-92299-4_20 [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina
    2003Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00049.zhu
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error