1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Dialoguing is about to various elements of a situation, that propagate themselves in what people say and do. In other words, each time people talk about an element of a situation, whether it is the weather, the economy, or the declaration of a presidential candidate, it is, by definition, a way for it to transport itself through time and space, which is the essence of propagation. Language must therefore be rethought as something that not only allows us, but also other things to do things with words. More generally, communication, whether verbal or non-verbal, must be understood as a process by which everything or everyone can always become a medium, sign or intermediary through which other elements propagate, diffuse or disseminate themselves.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00057.coo
2020-05-19
2020-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, Jennifer L.
    2017 “Self-interest and social concerns.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 294–306. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allwood, Jens
    2017 “Pragmatics: From language as a system of signs to language use.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 9–25. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aristotle
    2004Rhetoric (W. R. Roberts, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakthin, Mikhail M.
    1981The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1984Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
    https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barad, Karen
    2003 “Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society28(3): 801–830. 10.1086/345321
    https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2007Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bartesaghi, Mariaelena
    2014 “Ventriloquism as a matter for discourse analysis.” Language Under Discussion, 2(1), Retrieved fromwww.ludjournal.org/index.php?journal=LUD&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=35&path%5B%5D=17
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bartesaghi, Mariaelena, Oren Livio, and Frédérik Matte
    2020 “The authority of the “broader context”: What’s not in the interaction?” InBencherki, N., Matte, F., and Cooren, F. (Eds). Authority and Power in Social Interaction: Methods and Analysis, 18–36. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernstein, Basil
    1990The Structure of Pedagogic Discourse: Class, Codes and Control, Vol.VI. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203011263
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203011263 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carey, James W.
    2008Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. New york: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Castor, Theresa
    2016 “The materiality of discourse: Relational positioning in a fresh water controversy.” Communication Research and Practice2(3): 334–350. 10.1080/22041451.2016.1221685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1221685 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cole, Samantha
    2017 “AI-assisted fake porn is here and we’re all fucked.” Motherboard. Retrieved fromwww.vice.com/en_us/article/gydydm/gal-gadot-fake-ai-porn
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Connor, Steven
    2000 Dumbstruck: A Cultural History of Ventriloquism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198184331.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198184331.001.0001
  15. Cooren, François and Sergey Sandler
    2014 “Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory, 24, 225-244. 10.1111/comt.12041
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12041 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cooren, François
    2010Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation, and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2012 “Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality.” Journal of Communication62: 1–20. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2011.01622.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x [Google Scholar]
  18. 2014 “Pragmatism as ventriloquism: Creating a dialogue among seven traditions in the study of communication.” Language Under Discussion2(1). Retrieved fromwww.ludjournal.org/index.php?journal=LUD&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=16&path%5B%5D=5. 10.31885/lud.2.1.239
    https://doi.org/10.31885/lud.2.1.239 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2016 “Ethics for dummies: Ventriloquism and responsibility.” Atlantic Journal of Communication24(1): 17–30. 10.1080/15456870.2016.1113963
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2016.1113963 [Google Scholar]
  20. Day, Amber
    2018 “Throwing our voices: Ventriloquism as new media activism”. Media, Culture & Society, 40(4), 617-628. 10.1177/0163443718756064
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718756064 [Google Scholar]
  21. Derrida, Jacques
    1967/1978Writing and Difference. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1988Limited Inc.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldblatt, David
    2006 Art and Ventriloquism: Critical Voices in Art, Theory and Culture. London/New York: Routledge.
  24. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Goffman, Erving
    1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Grein, Marion
    2017 “Emotion, reason and the human brain.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 277–293. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hansen, Mark B. N.
    2006 “Media theory.” Theory, Culture & Society23: 297–306. 10.1177/026327640602300256
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300256 [Google Scholar]
  28. Heidegger, Martin
    2016Ponderings II-VI: Black notebooks1931–1938. New Haven, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Iedema, Rick
    2003 “Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice.” Visual Communication2(1): 29–57. 10.1177/1470357203002001751
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jones, Rodney H.
    2005 “Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse.” InDiscourse in Action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis, ed. bySigrid Norris and Rodney H. Jones, 141–154. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203018767
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203018767 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kecskes, Istvan
    2017 “From pragmatics to dialogue.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 78–92. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kessler, Sarah
    2016 “Puppet love: Documenting ventriloquism in Nina Conti’s Her Master’s Voice.” Camera Obscura, 92(31), 60-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kittler, Friedrich A.
    1986/1999Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford, CA: Stanford California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Krämer, Sybille
    2015 Medium, Messenger, Transmission: An Approach to Media Philosophy. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. 10.1515/9789048524990
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048524990
  35. Latour, Bruno
    1986 “Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together.” InKnowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, ed. byElizabeth Long and Henrika Kuklick, 1–40. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1987Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 1996 “On Interobjectivity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity3(4): 228–245. 10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Linell, Per
    2009Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. McLuhan, Marshall
    1964Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Peirce, Charles S.
    1868 “Some consequences of four incapacities.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy2(3): 140–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Peters, John D.
    1999Speaking into the Air: A history of the Idea of Communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sacks, Harvey
    1992Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Samuelson, Beth Lewis
    2009 “Ventriloquation in discussion of student writing: Examples from a high school english class.” Research in the Teaching of English, 44(1), 52-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1959Course in General Linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.Charles Bally and Albert Sechehayeed.). New York: Philosophical Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Scollon, Ron
    1997 “Handbills, tissues, and condoms: A site of engagement for the construction of identity in public discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics1(1): 39–61. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00003
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00003 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2001Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2005 “The rhythmic integration of action and discourse: work, the body and the earth.” InDiscourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, ed. bySigrid Norris and Rodney H. Jones, 20–31. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Shotter, John
    1993Conversational Realities: Constructing Life through Language. London, UK: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2014 “Agential realism, social constructionism, and our living relations to our surroundings: Sensing similarities rather than seeing patterns.” Theory and Psychology24(3): 305–325. 10.1177/0959354313514144
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354313514144 [Google Scholar]
  50. Taylor, James R. and Elizabeth J. Van Every
    2011The Situated Organization: Case Studies In the Pragmatics of Communication. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Weigand, Edda
    2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  52. (ed.) 2017The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00057.coo
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agency , dialogue , propagation and ventriloquism
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error