1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language and Dialogue
  4. Volume 10, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Dialoguing is about to various elements of a situation, that propagate themselves in what people say and do. In other words, each time people talk about an element of a situation, whether it is the weather, the economy, or the declaration of a presidential candidate, it is, by definition, a way for it to transport itself through time and space, which is the essence of propagation. Language must therefore be rethought as something that not only allows us, but also other things to do things with words. More generally, communication, whether verbal or non-verbal, must be understood as a process by which everything or everyone can always become a medium, sign or intermediary through which other elements propagate, diffuse or disseminate themselves.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00057.coo
2020-05-19
2023-09-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ld.00057.coo
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, Jennifer L.
    2017 “Self-interest and social concerns.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 294–306. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allwood, Jens
    2017 “Pragmatics: From language as a system of signs to language use.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 9–25. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aristotle
    2004 Rhetoric (W. R. Roberts, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakthin, Mikhail M.
    1981 The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1984 Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
     https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barad, Karen
    2003 “Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society28(3): 801–830. 10.1086/345321
     https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2007 Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bartesaghi, Mariaelena
    2014 “Ventriloquism as a matter for discourse analysis.” Language Under Discussion, 2(1), Retrieved fromwww.ludjournal.org/index.php?journal=LUD&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=35&path%5B%5D=17
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bartesaghi, Mariaelena, Oren Livio, and Frédérik Matte
    2020 “The authority of the “broader context”: What’s not in the interaction?” InBencherki, N., Matte, F., and Cooren, F. (Eds). Authority and Power in Social Interaction: Methods and Analysis, 18–36. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernstein, Basil
    1990 The Structure of Pedagogic Discourse: Class, Codes and Control, Vol.VI. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203011263
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203011263 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carey, James W.
    2008 Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. New york: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Castor, Theresa
    2016 “The materiality of discourse: Relational positioning in a fresh water controversy.” Communication Research and Practice2(3): 334–350. 10.1080/22041451.2016.1221685
     https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1221685 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cole, Samantha
    2017 “AI-assisted fake porn is here and we’re all fucked.” Motherboard. Retrieved fromwww.vice.com/en_us/article/gydydm/gal-gadot-fake-ai-porn
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Connor, Steven
    2000 Dumbstruck: A Cultural History of Ventriloquism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198184331.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198184331.001.0001
  15. Cooren, François and Sergey Sandler
    2014 “Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory, 24, 225-244. 10.1111/comt.12041
     https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12041 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cooren, François
    2010 Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation, and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2012 “Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality.” Journal of Communication62: 1–20. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2011.01622.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x [Google Scholar]
  18. 2014 “Pragmatism as ventriloquism: Creating a dialogue among seven traditions in the study of communication.” Language Under Discussion2(1). Retrieved fromwww.ludjournal.org/index.php?journal=LUD&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=16&path%5B%5D=5. 10.31885/lud.2.1.239
     https://doi.org/10.31885/lud.2.1.239 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2016 “Ethics for dummies: Ventriloquism and responsibility.” Atlantic Journal of Communication24(1): 17–30. 10.1080/15456870.2016.1113963
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2016.1113963 [Google Scholar]
  20. Day, Amber
    2018 “Throwing our voices: Ventriloquism as new media activism”. Media, Culture & Society, 40(4), 617-628. 10.1177/0163443718756064
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718756064 [Google Scholar]
  21. Derrida, Jacques
    1967/1978 Writing and Difference. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 1988 Limited Inc.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldblatt, David
    2006 Art and Ventriloquism: Critical Voices in Art, Theory and Culture. London/New York: Routledge.
  24. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Goffman, Erving
    1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Grein, Marion
    2017 “Emotion, reason and the human brain.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 277–293. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hansen, Mark B. N.
    2006 “Media theory.” Theory, Culture & Society23: 297–306. 10.1177/026327640602300256
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300256 [Google Scholar]
  28. Heidegger, Martin
    2016 Ponderings II-VI: Black notebooks1931–1938. New Haven, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Iedema, Rick
    2003 “Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice.” Visual Communication2(1): 29–57. 10.1177/1470357203002001751
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jones, Rodney H.
    2005 “Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse.” InDiscourse in Action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis, ed. bySigrid Norris and Rodney H. Jones, 141–154. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203018767
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203018767 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kecskes, Istvan
    2017 “From pragmatics to dialogue.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 78–92. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kessler, Sarah
    2016 “Puppet love: Documenting ventriloquism in Nina Conti’s Her Master’s Voice.” Camera Obscura, 92(31), 60-91.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kittler, Friedrich A.
    1986/1999 Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford, CA: Stanford California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Krämer, Sybille
    2015 Medium, Messenger, Transmission: An Approach to Media Philosophy. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. 10.1515/9789048524990
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048524990
  35. Latour, Bruno
    1986 “Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together.” InKnowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, ed. byElizabeth Long and Henrika Kuklick, 1–40. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 1987 Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 1996 “On Interobjectivity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity3(4): 228–245. 10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Linell, Per
    2009 Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. McLuhan, Marshall
    1964 Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Peirce, Charles S.
    1868 “Some consequences of four incapacities.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy2(3): 140–157.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Peters, John D.
    1999 Speaking into the Air: A history of the Idea of Communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Samuelson, Beth Lewis
    2009 “Ventriloquation in discussion of student writing: Examples from a high school english class.” Research in the Teaching of English, 44(1), 52-88.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1959 Course in General Linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.Charles Bally and Albert Sechehayeed.). New York: Philosophical Library.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Scollon, Ron
    1997 “Handbills, tissues, and condoms: A site of engagement for the construction of identity in public discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics1(1): 39–61. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00003
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00003 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2001 Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 2005 “The rhythmic integration of action and discourse: work, the body and the earth.” InDiscourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, ed. bySigrid Norris and Rodney H. Jones, 20–31. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Shotter, John
    1993 Conversational Realities: Constructing Life through Language. London, UK: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 2014 “Agential realism, social constructionism, and our living relations to our surroundings: Sensing similarities rather than seeing patterns.” Theory and Psychology24(3): 305–325. 10.1177/0959354313514144
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354313514144 [Google Scholar]
  50. Taylor, James R. and Elizabeth J. Van Every
    2011 The Situated Organization: Case Studies In the Pragmatics of Communication. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Weigand, Edda
    2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  52. (ed.) 2017 The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00057.coo
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agency; dialogue; propagation; ventriloquism

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error