Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



My research addresses how social actors “act upon” social change by generating self-interpretation and representation of social life on the one hand and control over values and cultural orientations against the authorities on the other. While the existing literature on social movements overemphasizes the moments of mobilization, this article examines the intersections of social activism, online curative practices, and their everyday life. For this article, I opted to depict three representative cases of Hong Kong young activists who joined the Umbrella Movement in 2014. I argue that despite their similar political experiences, there are three divergent forms of agency embodied in their cultural representations. They figure in contestations which increasingly alienate the politicized crowd from civil society and the establishment.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abercrombie, Nicholas and Bryan Turner
    1978 “The Dominant Ideology.” The British Journal of Sociology29(2): 149–170. 10.2307/589886
    https://doi.org/10.2307/589886 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barber, Benjamin B.
    2003 “Which Technology and Which Democracy?” InDemocracy and the new media, ed. byHenry Jenkins and David Thorburn, 33–48. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, Andy
    2004 “Virtual subculture? Youth identity and the Internet.” InAfter subculture: Critical Studies in Contemporary Youth Culture, ed. byAndy Bennett and Keith Khan-Harris, 162–172. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑21467‑5_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21467-5_12 [Google Scholar]
  4. Castells, Manuel
    1983The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-cultural Theory of Urban Social Movement. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2009The Rise of the Network Society. vol.1, 2nd edition. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444319514
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2010The Power of Identity. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chan, Chitat
    2013 “Young activists and the anti-patriotic education movement in postcolonial Hong Kong: some insights from Twitter.” Journal of Citizenship, Social and Economics Education12(3): 148–162. 10.2304/csee.2013.12.3.148
    https://doi.org/10.2304/csee.2013.12.3.148 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chu, Donna
    2009 “Collective behavior in YouTube: a case study of ‘Bus Uncle’ online videos.” Asian Journal of Communication19(3): 337–353. 10.1080/01292980903039038
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980903039038 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2018 “Media Use and Protest Mobilization: A Case Study of Umbrella Movement Within Hong Kong Schools.” Social Media Society4(1): 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chu, Yin-Wah and James T. H. Tang
    2005 “The Internet and Civil Society: Environmental and Labour Organizations in Hong Kong.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29(4): 849–866. 10.1111/j.1468‑2427.2005.00625.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00625.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Day, Richard
    2004 “From hegemony to affinity: The political logic of the newest social movements.” Cultural Studies18(5): 716–748. 10.1080/0950238042000260360
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0950238042000260360 [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, Michel
    1980 “Truth and Power.” InPower/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings by Michel Foucault, 1972–1977, ed. byColin Gordon, 109–133. New York: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fu, King-wa, Wincy S. C. Chan, Paul W. C. Wong, and Paul S. F. Yip
    2010 “Internet addiction: prevalence, discriminant validity and correlates among adolescents in Hong Kong.” The British Journal of Psychiatry196(6): 486–492. 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.075002
    https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.075002 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gamson, William
    1991 “Commitment and Agency in Social Movement.” Sociological Forum6(1): 27–50. 10.1007/BF01112726
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112726 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, Jeff and James M. Jasper
    2015 “Editors Introduction.” InThe Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, ed. byJeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper, 1–8. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Grossberg, Lawrence
    1996 “The Space of Culture, the Power of Space.” The Postcolonial Question: Common Skies, Divided Horizons, ed. byIain Chambers and Lidia Curti, 169–188. London/ New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gupta, Akhil and James Ferguson
    1992 “Beyond ‘Culture’: Space, Identity, and the Politics of Difference.” Cultural Anthropology7(1): 6–23. 10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00020
    https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00020 [Google Scholar]
  18. Habermas, Jürgen
    1989The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2009 “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy still have an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research.” Europe. The Faltering Project. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hannigan, John A.
    1985 “Alain Touraine, Manuel Castells and Social Movement Theory: A Critical Appraisal.” The Sociological Quarterly26(4): 435–454. 10.1111/j.1533‑8525.1985.tb00237.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1985.tb00237.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Hine, Christine
    2000Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage. 10.4135/9780857020277
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020277 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hogan, Bernie
    2010 “The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online.” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society30(6): 377–386. 10.1177/0270467610385893
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893 [Google Scholar]
  23. Holloway, John
    2005 “Change the World without Taking Power.” Capital and Class29(1): 39–42. 10.1177/030981680508500112
    https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680508500112 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hodge, Robert and Gunther Kress
    1988Social Semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hook, Derek
    2001 “Discourse, Knowledge, Materiality, History: Foucault and Discourse Analysis.” Theory and Psychology11(4): 521–547. 10.1177/0959354301114006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301114006 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ip, Iam-chong
    2015 “Politics of belonging: a study of the campaign against mainland visitors in Hong Kong.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies16(3): 410–421. 10.1080/14649373.2015.1069054
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2015.1069054 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2019 “Political de-institutionalization and the rise of right-wing nativism.” Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Hong Kong, ed. byTai-lok Lui, Stephen W. K. Chiu, and Ray Yep, 462–473. London/ New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Laclau, Ernesto
    1990 “The Impossibility of the Society.” New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time89–92. New York/ London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lam, Wai-Man
    2004Understanding the Political Culture of Hong Kong: The Paradox of Activism and Depoliticization: The Paradox of Activism and Depoliticization. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lau, Siu-kai
    1984Society and Politics in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lau, Siu-kai and Hsin-chi Kuan
    1988The Ethos of the Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Law, Wing Sang
    2009Collaborative Colonial Power: The Making of the Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee, Francis Lap Fung and Joseph Man Chan
    2008 “Making sense of participation: The political culture of pro-democracy demonstrators in Hong Kong.” The China Quarterly193: 84–101. 10.1017/S0305741008000052
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741008000052 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee, Francis Lap Fung and Joseph Man Chan. [李立峰、陳韜文]
    2013 初探香港「社運社會」:分析香港社會集體抗爭行動的形態和發展 (Exploring the social movement society in Hong Kong: An analysis of the formation and development of contentious collective actions in Hong Kong). In[張少強、梁啟智等 編] (eds.) 《香港,論述,傳媒》 (Hong Kong, Discourse, Media, ed. byCheung, S. K. ), 243–263. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Leung, Dennis K. K. and Francis Lap Fung Lee
    2014 “Cultivating an Active Online Counterpublic: Examining Usage and Political Impact of Internet Alternative Media.” The International Journal of Press/Politics19(3): 340–359. 10.1177/1940161214530787
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214530787 [Google Scholar]
  36. Leung, Lisa Yuk Ming
    2018 “Online Radio Listening as ‘affective Publics’? (Closeted) Participation in the Post-Umbrella Movement Everyday.” Cultural Studies32(4): 511–529. 10.1080/09502386.2017.1357133
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1357133 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lin, Wan-Ying, Pauline Hope Cheong, Yong-Chan Kim and Joo-Young Jung
    2010 “Becoming Citizens: Youths’ Civic Uses of New Media in Five Digital Cities in East Asia.” Journal of Adolescent Research25(6): 839–857. 10.1177/0743558410371125
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558410371125 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ma, Ngor
    2011 “Value changes and legitimacy crisis in post-industrial Hong Kong.” Asian Survey51(4): 683–712. 10.1525/as.2011.51.4.683
    https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2011.51.4.683 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2015 “The rise of ‘anti-China’ sentiments in Hong Kong and the 2012 Legislative Council elections.” The China Review15(1): 39–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Newman, Saul
    2001From Bakunin to Lacan: Anti-Authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power. Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Offe, Claus
    1985 “New social movements: challenging the boundaries of institutional politics.” Social Research52(4): 817–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Page, Ruth E.
    2012Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Peters
    2008 “On Public Deliberation and Public Culture.” InPublic Deliberation and Public Culture: The Writings of Bernhard Peters, 1993 – 2005, ed. byHartmut Wessler, 68–121. London: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Plows, Alexandra
    2008 “Social Movements and Ethnographic Methodologies: An Analysis Using Case Study Examples.” Sociology Compass2(5): 1523–38. 10.1111/j.1751‑9020.2008.00091.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00091.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Putnam, Robert D.
    2001Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rucht, Dieter
    1991 “Sociological theory as a theory of social movements?: A critique of Alain Touraine.” InResearch on Social Movements: The State of the Art in Western Europe and the USA, ed. byDieter Rucht, 355–384. Boulder: Westview.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Schudson, Michael
    2006 “New Technologies and Not-So-New Democracies.” Mediekultur22(40): 6–14. 10.7146/mediekultur.v22i40.1284
    https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v22i40.1284 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sunstein, Cass R.
    2009Republic. com 2.0. New Haven: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tilly, Charles
    1986The Contentious French. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 10.4159/harvard.9780674433984
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674433984 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tilly, Charles and Tarrow, Sidney
    2015Contentious Politics. Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Thompson, John B.
    1992Ideology and Modern Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press. 10.2307/591346
    https://doi.org/10.2307/591346 [Google Scholar]
  52. Touraine, Alain
    1977The Self-Production of Society. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 1992 “Beyond Social Movements?” Theory, Culture and Society9(1): 125–145. 10.1177/026327692009001007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026327692009001007 [Google Scholar]
  54. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1997Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2002 “Political Discourse and Ideology.” InAnàlisi del discurs polític, ed. byClara U. Lorda and Montserrat Ribas, 15–34. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. van Manen, Max
    2010 The Pedagogy of Momus Technologies: Facebook, Privacy, and Online Intimacy. Qualitative Health Research20(8): 1023–1032. 10.1177/1049732310364990
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310364990 [Google Scholar]
  57. Vannini, Phillip
    2007 “Social Semiotics and Fieldwork: Method and Analytics.” Qualitative Inquiry13(1): 113–140. 10.1177/1077800406295625
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406295625 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wilson, Brian and Michael Atkinson
    2005 “Rave and Straightedge, the virtual and the real: Exploring online and offline experiences in Canadian youth subcultures.” Youth and Society36(3), 276–311. 10.1177/0044118X03260498
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X03260498 [Google Scholar]
  59. Wilson, Brian
    2006 “Youth Culture, Complexity, and Rave.” InFight, Flight, or Chill: Subcultures, Youth, and Rave into the Twenty-First Century, 2–34. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Yiu, Chi Shing, Kevin Grant, and David Edgar
    2007 “Factors affecting the adoption of Internet Banking in Hong Kong – implications for the banking sector.” International Journal of Information Management27(5): 336–351. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.03.002 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error