Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The study explores public educational meetings that aim to promote the Belarusian language and culture. In the course of the meetings, those who do not have the same values and are not present during meetings are brought up into a conversation. In other words, the voice of the others who are not part of the community gets involved in the dialogue. Besides, some of the invited guests do not speak Belarusian and part of the audience is not necessarily interested in learning Belarusian but rather attends these meetings to meet with those guests. In this respect, the study explores the interactional resources the hosts and the attendees use to construct the dialogue with the other in their absence and in their presence. It investigates who is considered to be the other and how the other is discursively constructed.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baločkaitė, Rasa
    2014 “On ideology, language, and identity: Language politics in the Soviet and post-Soviet Lithuania.” Language Policy13: 41–61. 10.1007/s10993‑013‑9301‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9301-z [Google Scholar]
  2. Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse Studies7: 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins English Dictionary
    Collins English Dictionary. n.d.Retrieved fromwww.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/sect_1
  4. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1997 “Political discourse and racism: Describing others in Western Parliaments.” InThe Language and Politics of Exclusion, ed. byStephen Harold Riggins, 31–64. Thousand Oaks/ London/ New Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dori-Hacohen, Gonen
    2014 “Establishing social groups in Hebrew: ‘We’ in political radio phone in-programs.” InConstructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts, ed. byTheodossia-Soula Pavlidou, 187–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.239.13dor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.239.13dor [Google Scholar]
  6. Duszak, Anna
    2002 “Us and others: Introduction.” InUs and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses, and Cultures, ed. byAnna Duszak, 1–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.98.01dus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.98.01dus [Google Scholar]
  7. Echeverria, Begoña
    2003 “Language ideologies and practices in (en)gendering the Basque nation.” Language and Society32: 383–413. 10.1017/S0047404503323048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404503323048 [Google Scholar]
  8. Emlen, Nicolas Q.
    2015 “Public discourse and community formation in a trilingual Matsigenka-Quechua-Spanish frontier community of Southern Peru.” Language in Society44: 679–703. 10.1017/S0047404515000597
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000597 [Google Scholar]
  9. Feller, Sebastian
    2014 “The good, the bad, and the ugly: The construction of identities in dialog.” Language and Dialogue4: 341–356. 10.1075/ld.4.3.01fel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.3.01fel [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferguson, Charles
    1959 “Diglossia.” Word15: 325–340. 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fishman, Joshua
    1967 “Bilingualism with and without diglossia; diglossia with and without bilingualism.” Journal of Social Issues32: 29–38. 10.1111/j.1540‑4560.1967.tb00573.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00573.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Giles, Howard, Richard Y. Bourhis, and Donald M. Taylor
    1977 “Toward a theory of language in ethnic group relations.” InLanguage, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations, ed. byHoward Giles, 307–348. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goffman, Erving
    1981Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Holmes, Janet and Meredith Mara
    2002 “Humour as a discursive boundary marker in social interaction,” InUs and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses, and Cultures, ed. byAnna Duszak, 377–400. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.98.23hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.98.23hol [Google Scholar]
  15. Jensen, Sune Q.
    2011 “Othering, identity formation and agency.” Qualitative Studies2: 63–78. 10.7146/qs.v2i2.5510
    https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v2i2.5510 [Google Scholar]
  16. Joyce, Nick, Lazlo Vincze, and Eniko Julia Marton
    2016 “Crossing the communication divide: Intergroup contact and the desire to learn outgroup’s language”. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication9: 295–311. 10.1080/17513057.2016.1225440
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2016.1225440 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kamwangamalu, Nkonko M.
    2002 “Code-switching, code-crossing, and identity construction in a society in transition, South Africa.” InUs and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses, and Cultures, ed. byAnna Duszak, 187–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.98.11kam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.98.11kam [Google Scholar]
  18. Karimzad, Farzad and Lydia Catedral
    2017 “‘No, we don’t mix languages’: Ideological power and the chronotopic organization of ethnolinguistic identities.” Language in Society47: 89–113. 10.1017/S0047404517000781
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000781 [Google Scholar]
  19. Koven, Michèle
    2007Selves in Two Languages: Bilinguals’ Verbal Enactments of Identity in French and Portuguese. John Benjamin. 10.1075/sibil.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.34 [Google Scholar]
  20. Koven, Michèle and Isabelle Simões Marques
    2015 “Performing and evaluating (non)modernities of Portuguese migrant figures on YouTube: The case of Antonio Carglough.” Language in Society44: 213–242. 10.1017/S0047404515000056
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000056 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lawler, Steph
    2014Identity: Sociological Perspectives, 2nd ed.Hoboken: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Levonian, Raluca
    2015 “Friends and foes: The construction of national identity and supra-national identities in contemporary Romanian public discourse.” Language and Dialogue5: 408–429. 10.1075/ld.5.3.03lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.3.03lev [Google Scholar]
  23. Littlejohn, Stephen W. and Karen A. Foss
    2009Encyclopedia of Communication Theory. Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. 10.4135/9781412959384
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959384 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mechkovskaja, Nina Borisovna [Мечковская, Нина Борисовна
    ] 1994 “Языковая ситуацияв Беларуси: Этические коллизии двуязычия [Language situation in Belarus: EthicalCollisions of Bilingualism]” Russian Linguistics18: 299–322. 10.1007/BF01650150
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01650150 [Google Scholar]
  25. Morgan, Carrie Ann
    2017 “Post-socialist language ideologies in action: Linking interview context and language ideology through stance.” Journal of Sociolinguistics12/1: 34–63. 10.1111/josl.12225
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12225 [Google Scholar]
  26. Perrino, Sabina
    2015 “Performing extracomunitari: Mocking migrants in Veneto barzelette.” Language in Society44: 141–160. 10.1017/S0047404515000020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000020 [Google Scholar]
  27. Riggins, Stephen Harold
    1997 “The rhetoric of othering.” InThe Language and Politics of Exclusion, ed. byStephen Harold Riggins, 1–30. Thousand Oaks/ London/ New Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sanders, Robert E., Kristina L. Fitch, and Anita Pomerantz
    2001 “Core research traditions within language and social interaction.” Annals of the International Communication Association24: 385–408. 10.1080/23808985.2001.11678995
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2001.11678995 [Google Scholar]
  29. Skarżyńska, Krystyna
    2002 “We and they in political discourse: A psychological approach”. InUs and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses, and Cultures, ed. byAnna Duszak, 249–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.98.15ska
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.98.15ska [Google Scholar]
  30. Sinner, Carsten
    2002 “The construction of identity and group boundaries in Catalan Spanish.” InUs and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses, and Cultures, ed. byAnna Duszak, 159–185. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.98.10sin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.98.10sin [Google Scholar]
  31. Sperry, Douglas E., Linda L. Sperry, and Peggy J. Miller
    2015 “Language socialization.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. byKaren Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, and Todd Sandel, 1–17. Boston: John Wiley and Sons. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi114
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi114 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sebba, Mark
    2011 “Societal bilingualism.” InThe SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. byRuth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone, and Paul Kerswill, 445–459. London, England: SAGE. 10.4135/9781446200957.n31
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200957.n31 [Google Scholar]
  33. Трусаў, Aлег. [Trusau, Aleg
    .] (June 2015) “Русіфікацыя беларускай мовы на Беларусі ў ХХ ст. [Russification of the Belarusian language in Belarus in the 20th century].” Retrieved fromtbm-mova.by/news_1203.html
  34. Tracy, Karen
    2001 “Discourse analysis in communication.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byDeborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 725–749. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tracy, Karen and Jessica S. Robles
    2013 “Talk and identity.” InEveryday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities, ed. byKaren Tracy, 3–30. New York/ London: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Vasilyeva, Alena L.
    2019 “Language ideology and identity construction in public educational meetings.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication12: 146–166. 10.1080/17513057.2019.1575453
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2019.1575453 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wiese, Heike
    2015 ““This migrants’ babble is not a German dialect!”: The interaction of standard language ideology and ‘us’/‘them’ dichotomies in the public discourse on a multiethnolect.” Language in Society44: 341–368. 10.1017/S0047404515000226
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000226 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wodak, Ruth
    1997 “Das Ausland and anti-Semitic discourse: The discourse construction of the other.” InThe Language and Politics of Exclusion, ed. byStephen Harold Riggins, 65–87. Thousand Oaks/ London/ New Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dialogue; discourse analysis; identity; language attitudes; language ideology; other
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error