Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Research has shown that Donald Trump’s rhetorical style on Twitter differs significantly during the time he was a citizen, a presidential candidate and a president (Ott and Dickinson 2019). The aim of the current study is to characterize his rhetorical style on Twitter during the 2016 presidential race, in light of its potential to influence future campaigns in the U.S. and outside, and its implications on political and public discourse. The study presents a comprehensive analysis of Trump’s Twitter habits, using statistical analyses and a content analysis of all tweets posted on Trump’s Twitter account from the date he announced his presidential candidacy until he won the election. Analysing the results using framing theory reveals Trump’s main campaigning strategies on Twitter:(a) negative campaigning against his rivals and the establishment; (b) bypassing the traditional media; and (c) self-promotion. Trump used his Twitter far less frequently to express his vision or future plans.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aharony, Noa
    2012 “Twitter use by three political leaders: An exploratory analysis.” Online Information Review36(4): 587–603. doi:  10.1108/14684521211254086
    https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211254086 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alang, Navneet
    2016, November15. “Trump is America’s first Twitter president. Be afraid.” New Republic. Retrieved fromhttps://newrepublic.com/article/138753/trump-americas-first-twitter-president-afraid
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    1986 “The problem of speech genres.” InSpeech Genres and Other Late Essays, Vern W. McGee (trans.) Austin: Texas: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baragona, Justin
    2017, January20. “Should I keep the Twitter going or not?: Trump asks crowd at Inaugural Ball.” Retrieved from: www.mediaite.com/election-2016/should-i-keep-the-twitter-going-or-not-trump-asks-crowd-at-inaugural-ball/
  5. Bennett, Lance W.
    2012 “The personalization of politics.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science644(1): 20–39. doi:  10.1177/0002716212451428
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonaccini, Nicola
    2016 “What Aristotle would say to Donald Trump.” Retrieved from: www.academia.edu/18954715/Rethoric_What_Aristotle_would_say_to_Donald_Trump
  7. Brookey, Robert Alan and Brian L. Ott
    2019 “Trump and Twitter 2.0.” Critical Studies in Media Communication36(1): 92–96. 10.1080/15295036.2018.1546052
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2018.1546052 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cogburn, Derrick L. and Fatima K. Espinoza-Vasquez
    2011 “From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign.” Journal of Political Marketing10(1–2): 189–213. doi:  10.1080/15377857.2011.540224
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2011.540224 [Google Scholar]
  9. Conway, Bethany Anne, Kate Kenski, and Di Wang
    2013 “Twitter use by presidential primary candidates during the 2012 campaign.” American Behavioral Scientist57(11): 1596–1610. doi:  10.1177/0002764213489014
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213489014 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cowell, Philip
    2017, March2. “Culture – What overusing exclamation marks says about you.” Retrieved from: www.bbc.co.uk/culture/story/20170301-what-overusing-exclamation-marks-says-about-you?ocid=fbcul
  11. Davis, Michael L. and Michael Ferrantino
    1996 “Towards a positive theory of political rhetoric: Why do politicians lie?” Public Choice88 (1–2): 1–13. doi:  10.1007/BF00130405
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130405 [Google Scholar]
  12. Entman, Robert M.
    1993 “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.” Journal of Communication43: 51–58. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Evans, Heather K., Kayla J. Brown, and Tiffany Wimberly
    2017 “Delete your account: The 2016 presidential race in Twitter.” Social Science Computer Review36(4): 500–508. doi:  10.1177/0894439317728722
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317728722 [Google Scholar]
  14. Evans, Heather K., Victoria Cordova, and Savannah Sipole
    2014 “Twitter style: An analysis of how House candidates used Twitter in their 2012 campaigns.” PS: Political Science and Politics47(02): 454–462. doi:  10.1017/S1049096514000389
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514000389 [Google Scholar]
  15. Francia, Peter L.
    2017 “Free media and Twitter in the 2016 presidential election: The unconventional campaign of Donald Trump.” Social Science Computer Review, 36(4): 440–455. doi:  10.1177/0894439317730302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317730302 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gainor, Dan
    2016, December7. “Trump the Twitter president: Social media gives him tweet revenge.” Fox News. Retrieved from: www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/12/07/trump-twitter-president-social-media-gives-him-tweet-revenge.html
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gainous, Jason and Kevin M. Wagner
    2014Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goffman, Ervine
    1974Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Golbeck, Jennifer, Justin M. Grimes, and Anthony Rogers
    2010 “Twitter use by the U.S. Congress.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61(8): 1612–1621. doi:  10.1002/asi.21344
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21344 [Google Scholar]
  20. Graham, Todd, Marcel Broersma, Karin Hazelhoff, and Guido Van’t Haar
    2013 Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters.” Information, Communication and Society16(5): 692–716. doi:  10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581 [Google Scholar]
  21. Graham, Todd, Dan Jackson, and Marcel Broersma
    2014 “New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns.” New Media and Society18(5): 765–783. doi:  10.1177/1461444814546728
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814546728 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gueorguieva, Vassia
    2007 “Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond.” Social Science Computer Review26(3): 288–300. doi:  10.1177/0894439307305636
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307305636 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jackson, Nigel and Darren Lilleker
    2011 “Microblogging, constituency service and impression management: UK MPs and the use of Twitter.” The Journal of Legislative Studies17(1): 86–105. doi:  10.1080/13572334.2011.545181
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.545181 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jungherr, Andreas
    2015 “Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics13(1): 72–91. doi:  10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401 [Google Scholar]
  25. Khan, Laeeq
    2016, November15. “Trump Won Thanks to Social Media.” The Hill. Retrieved from: thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/technology/306175-trump-won-thanks-to-social-media
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kreiss, Daniel
    2014 “Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle.” New Media and Society18(8): 1473–1490. doi:  10.1177/1461444814562445
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562445 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lilleker, Darren G. and Nigel Jackson
    2014, March19. “Brand management and relationship marketing in online environments.” RetrievedJanuary 02, 2018, from: eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/21097/
  28. Livnat, Zohar
    2012Dialogue, Science and Academic Writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.13
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.13 [Google Scholar]
  29. Macnamara, Jim and Gail Kenning
    2011 “E-Electioneering 2010: Trends in social media use in Australian political communication.” Media International Australia139(1): 7–22. doi:  10.1177/1329878X1113900104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1113900104 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ott, Brian L.
    2016 “The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication34(1): 59–68. 10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ott, Brian L. and Greg Dickinson
    2019The Twitter presidency: Donald J. Trump and the politics of white rage. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis. 10.4324/9780429054259
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429054259 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pan, Zhongdang and Gerald M. Kosicki
    1993 “Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse.” Political communication10(1): 55–75. 10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963 [Google Scholar]
  33. Reisigl, Martin
    2008 “Analyzing Political Rhetoric.” InQualitative Discourse in the Social Sciences, ed. byRuth Wodak and Michal Kryzanowski: 96–120. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑04798‑4_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04798-4_5 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rozenberg, Paul
    2017, January15. “Don’t think of a rampaging elephant: Linguist George Lakoff explains how the Democrats helped elect Trump.” RetrievedMay 5, 2017, from: www.salon.com/2017/01/15/dont-think-of-a-rampaging-elephant-linguist-george-lakoff-explains-how-the-democrats-helped-elect-trump/The+Role+of+Information+Communication+Technologies+in+the+“Arab+Spring
  35. Schultz, Friederike, Sonja Utz, and Anja Göritz
    2011 “Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media.” Public Relations Review37(1): 20–27. doi:  10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Small, Tamara A.
    2011 “What the hashtag?”. Information, Communication and Society14(6): 872–895. doi:  10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572 [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith, Craig R.
    2016 “Ronald Reagan’s rhetorical re-invention of conservatism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech103(1–2): 33–65. doi:  10.1080/00335630.2016.1231415
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2016.1231415 [Google Scholar]
  38. Steudeman, Michael J. and Trevor Parry-Giles
    2016 “Redeeming the maverick McCain: Game change as hyperreal campaign history.” Communication Quarterly64(5): 553–572. doi:  10.1080/01463373.2016.1176938
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.1176938 [Google Scholar]
  39. Taylor, Kathleen
    2004Brainwashing: The science of thought control. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Taylor, Maureen, Michael L. Kent, and William J. White
    2001 “How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships.” Public Relations Review27: 263–284. 10.1016/S0363‑8111(01)00086‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00086-8 [Google Scholar]
  41. Tewksbury, David and Dietram A. Scheufele
    2007 Special issue on framing, agenda setting, and priming: Agendas for theory and research.” Journal of Communication57(1): 8–8. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00337.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00337.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Trump, Donald and Tony Schwartz
    2017Trump the art of the deal. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Vergeer, Maurice, Hermans Liesbeth, and Steven Sams
    2011 “Online social networks and microblogging in political campaigning.” Party Politics19(3): 477–501. doi:  10.1177/1354068811407580
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811407580 [Google Scholar]
  44. Yu, Roger
    2016, November9. “How do you use the media to win? Just ask Donald Trump.” USA Today. Retrieved from: www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/11/09/trump-presidential-victory-lesson-how-use-media-win/93552638
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Weigand, Edda
    2009Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): content analysis; Donald Trump; political campaign; Twitter
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error