1887
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Compliment responses are speech acts assumed to mirror cultural appropriateness. In this sense, a review of responses to compliments offers cues about the ways in which speakers react to dialogic strategies of politeness. In order to examine how Icelanders react to compliments, an Elicitation Experiment (EE) was designed to evoke natural responses. It consisted in asking a group of 81 Icelandic informants (46 female, 35 male) to read tongue-twisters in Dutch and Spanish during a set of interviews. Informants were complimented based on their performance and their responses were recorded. Based on 162 exchange tokens, it is possible to conclude that not agreeing to compliments is the most common way of reacting to compliments in Iceland.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00066.gon
2020-09-04
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adachi, Chie
    2011 Sociolinguistic Investigation of Compliments and Compliment Responses among Young Japanese. PhD Thesis. University of Edinburgh.
  2. Ariely, Gal and Eldad Davidov
    2011 “Can We Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey.” Social Indicators Research104(2):271–286. 10.1007/s11205‑010‑9693‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9693-5 [Google Scholar]
  3. Asmuß, Birte and Jakob Steensig
    2003 “Samtalen på arbejde. Konversationsanalyse og kompetenceudvikling.” Samfundsliteratur341–343.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bayraktaroǧlu, Arın
    1991 “Politeness and interactional imbalance.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language92: 5–34. 10.1515/ijsl.1991.92.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1991.92.5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergqvist, Thérèse
    2009 Compliment responses among native and non-native English speakers: Evidence of Pragmatic transfer from Swedish into English. First Cycle Thesis. University of Gothembburg.
  6. Bjarnardóttir, Ragnhildur
    2013 “Leiðsögn kennaranema: stefnur og straumar.” Uppeldi og menntun22(2): 9–35. https://ojs.hi.is/uppmennt/article/view/1970
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson
    1987 (1978)Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  8. Celce-Murcia, Marianne
    1991 “Discourse analysis and grammar instruction.” InAnnual Review of Applied Linguistics, ed. byWilliam Grabe, 375–406. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Rong
    1993 “Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics20(1): 49–75. 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90106‑Y
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90106-Y [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  11. Eelen, Gino
    2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Færch, Claus and Gabriele Kasper
    1984 “Two ways of defining Communication Strategies.” Language Learning34(1):45–63. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1984.tb00995.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00995.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Golato, Andrea
    2002 “German compliment responses.” Journal of Pragmatics34(5): 547–571. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00040‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00040-6 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2005Compliments and Compliment Responses: Grammatical Structure and Sequential Organization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.15 [Google Scholar]
  15. Grein, Marion
    2018 “Progress in Language Teaching: From Competence to Dialogic Competence-in-performance.” InFrom Pragmatics to Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand and Istvan Kecskes, 61–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.31.05gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.05gre [Google Scholar]
  16. Han, Chung-Hye
    1992 “A comparative study of compliment responses: Korean females in Korean interactions and in English interactions.” Working papers in Educational Linguistics8(2):17–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Herbert, Robert
    1990 “Sex-based differences in compliment behavior.” Language in Society19: 201–224. 10.1017/S0047404500014378
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014378 [Google Scholar]
  18. Holmes, Janet
    1986 “Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English.” Anthropological Linguistics28(4): 485–508.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1995Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Houck, Noel and Susan Gass
    1996 “Non-native Refusals: A Methodological Perspective.” InSpeech Acts across Cultures: Challenges to Communication, ed. bySusan Gass and Joyce Neu, 45–64. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Inglehart, Ronald and Christian Welzel
    2010 Changing Mass Priorities. Perspectives on Politics8(2): 551–557. 10.1017/S1537592710001258
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001258 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    1997 “A multilevel approach in the study of talk in interaction.” Pragmatics7(1): 1–20. 10.1075/prag.7.1.01ker
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.7.1.01ker [Google Scholar]
  23. Koike, Hiroko
    2000 “A comparative study of responses to compliments in terms of subcultures: Interpersonal relations, sex, and generations.” Shinshuu University Journal100: 47–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. O’Driscoll, Jim
    2007 “Brown and Levinson’s face: How it can – and can’t – help us to understand interaction across cultures.” Intercultural Pragmatics4(4): 463–492.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ólafsson, Stefán
    2011 “Level of Living Consequences of Iceland’s financial crisis.” Iceland’s Recovery-Lessons and Challenges Symposium, IMF, CBI; Reykjavik27thOctober 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Morrison, Anthea and Janet Holmes
    2003 “Eliciting refusals: a methodological challenge.” Te Reo46: 47–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pomerantz, Anita
    1978 “Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints”. InStudies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. byJim Schenkein, 79–112. New York, NJ: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50010‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50010-0 [Google Scholar]
  28. Rafnsdóttir, Hulda, Ragnheiður Harpa Arnardóttir, & Sigrún Gunnarsdóttir
    2015 “Árangur og forysta í hjúkrun: viðhorf til þjónandi forystu, starfsánægju, starfstengdra þátta og gæða þjónustu á sjúkrahúsinu á Akureyri.” Tímarit hjúkrunarfræðinga91(4): 8–16. https://www.hirsla.lsh.is/handle/2336/581426
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Soenarso, Lany Idawati
    1988Developing social competence in complimenting behaviour among Indonesian learners of English. Unpublished MA thesis. Canberra College of Advanced Education, Canberra.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharifian, Farzad
    2005 “Cultural schemas in L1 and L2 compliment responses: A study of Persian-speaking learners of English.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture4(1): 55–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tannen, Deborah
    1990You just don’t understand: Women and men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tixier, Maud
    1996 Cultural adjustments required by expatriate managers working in the Nordic countries. International Journal of Manpower17(6):19–42. 10.1108/01437729610149312
    https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729610149312 [Google Scholar]
  33. Turnbull, William
    2001 “An Appraisal of Pragmatic Elicitation Techniques for the Social Psychological Study of Talk: The Case of Request Refusals.” Pragmatics11(1): 31–61. 10.1075/prag.11.1.03tur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.11.1.03tur [Google Scholar]
  34. Watts, Richard
    2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
  35. Weigand, Edda
    2007 “The Sociobiology of Language.” InDialogue and Culture, ed. byMarion Grein and Edda Weigand, 27–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.1.04wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.1.04wei [Google Scholar]
  36. 2009Language as Dialogue: From Rules to Principles of Probability, ed. bySebastian Feller. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2017The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1991Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00066.gon
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00066.gon
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agreement , appropriateness , compliments , Icelandic , politeness and tongue-twisters
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error