Demonstrative questions and epistemic authority management in medium-sitter interactions

References

1. Aphek, Edna and Yishai Tobin
   1990 The Semiotics of Fortune-Telling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/fos.22
   https://doi.org/10.1075/fos.22 [Google Scholar]
2. Avtgis, Theodore
   1998 “Locus of control and persuasion, social influence, and conformity: A meta-analytic review.” Psychological Reports83 (3): 899–903. doi:  10.2466/pr0.1998.83.3.899
   https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1998.83.3.899 [Google Scholar]
3. Beach, Wayne A.
   1993 “Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” usages.” Journal of Pragmatics19: 325–352. doi:  10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90092‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4 [Google Scholar]
4. Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
   2018a “Epistemic stance negotiation: Some examples from Italian conversations.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis135: 1–14. doi:  10.4467/20834624SL.18.001.8161
   https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.18.001.8161 [Google Scholar]
5. Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
   2018b “Questions and epistemic stance in Italian conversations.” Ampersand5: 29–40. doi:  10.1016/j.amper.2018.11.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar]
6. Chauvin, Bruno and Etienne Mullet
   2018 “Individual differences in paranormal beliefs: The differential role of personality aspetcs.” Current psychology: 1–10. doi:  10.1007/s12144‑018‑0047‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0047-9 [Google Scholar]
7. Cialdini, Robert B.
   1983 Influence. The Psychology of persuasion. New York: HarperCollins.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cialdini, Robert B.
   2004 “The science of persuasion.” Scientific American Mind14 (1): 70–77.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Delorme, Arnaud, Julie Beishel, Leena Michel, Mark Boccuzzi, Dean Radin and Paul J. Mills
   2013 “Electrocortical activity associated with subjective communication with deceased.” Frontiers in Psychology4: 1–10. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00834
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00834 [Google Scholar]
10. Drinkwater, Kenneth, Andrew Denovan, Neil Dagnall and Andrew Parker
    2018 “The Australian Sheep-Goat Scale: An Evaluation of Factor Structure and Convergent Validity.” Frontiers in Psychology9: 1–14. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01594
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01594 [Google Scholar]
11. Enoksen, Anette Einan and Paul Dickerson
    2018 “That proves my point: How mediums reconstrue disconfirmation in medium-sitter interactions.” British Journal of Social Psychology57: 386–403. doi:  10.1111/bjso.12241
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12241 [Google Scholar]
12. Hayano, Kaoru
    2011 “Claiming epistemic primacy: Yo-marked assessments in Japanese.” InThe Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. byTanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig, 58–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.004 [Google Scholar]
13. Hayano, Kaoru
    2014 “Question design in conversation.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, eds. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 395–414. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wyley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Heritage, John
    2012a “Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 1–29. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
15. Heritage, John
    2012b “The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 30–52. doi:  10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
16. Heritage, John and Geoffrey, Raymond G.
    2005 “The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly68 (1): 15–38. doi:  10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
17. Heritage, John
    2010 “Questioning in medicine”. In“Why Do You Ask?”: the Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. byAlice Freed and Susan Ehrlich, 42–68. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond
    2012 “Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions.” InQuestions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. byJan P. de Ruiter, 179–192. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139045414.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.013 [Google Scholar]
19. Jorgensen, Danny L.
    1984 “Divinatory Discourse.” Symbolic Interaction7 (2): 135–153. doi:  10.1525/si.1984.7.2.135
    https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1984.7.2.135 [Google Scholar]
20. Kamio, Akio
    1997 Territory of Information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.48 [Google Scholar]
21. Labov, William and David Fanshel
    1977 Therapeutic Discourse, Psychoterapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lamont, Peter, Claudia Coelho and Andrew Mckinlay
    2009 “Explaining the unexplained: Warranting disbelief in the paranormal.” Discourse Studies11 (5): 543–559. doi:  10.1177/1461445609340978
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609340978 [Google Scholar]
23. Lee, Seung-Hee
    2014 “Response design in conversation.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJohn Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 415–432. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2014 “Action formation and ascription.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJohn Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Linell, Per and Thomas Luckman
    1991 “Asymmetries in dialogue: some conceptual preliminaries”. InAsymmetries in Dialogue, ed. byIvana Marková and Klaus Foppa, 1–20. Hemel Hempsted: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Locke, Terry
    2004 Critical Discourse Analysis. New York/London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Milgram, Stanley
    1963 “Behavioural study of obedience.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology67: 371–378. doi:  10.1037/h0040525
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525 [Google Scholar]
28. Mondada, Lorenza
    2013 “Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided visits.” Discourse Studies15 (5): 597–626. doi:  10.1177/1461445613501577
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501577 [Google Scholar]
29. Ohashi, Yasushi, Robin Wooffitt, Clare Jackson and Yumi Nixon
    2013 “Discourse, culture, and extraordinary experiences: Observations from a comparative, qualitative analysis of Japanese and UK English accounts of paranormal phenomena.” Western Journal of Communication77(4): 466–488. doi:  10.1080/10570314.2012.714047
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2012.714047 [Google Scholar]
30. Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo
    1984 “The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1): 69–81. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.46.1.69
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69 [Google Scholar]
31. Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo
    1986 Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑4964‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1 [Google Scholar]
32. Raymond, Geoffrey
    2003 “Grammar and social organization: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding.” American Sociological Review68 (6): 939–967. 10.2307/1519752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752 [Google Scholar]
33. Riccioni, Ilaria, Ramona Bongelli, Gill Philip and Andrzej Zuczkowski
    2018 “Dubitative questions and epistemic stance.” Lingua, 207: 71–95. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2018.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.03.001 [Google Scholar]
34. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1980 “Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”.” Sociological Inquiry50: 104–52. doi:  10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00018.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00018.x [Google Scholar]
35. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction. London: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
36. Simmonds-Moore, Christine A.
    2016 “An interpretative phenomenological analysis exploring synesthesia as an exceptional experience: Insights for consciousness and cognition.” Qualitative Research in Psychology13(4): 303–327. doi:  10.1080/14780887.2016.1205693
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2016.1205693 [Google Scholar]
37. Stivers, Tanya
    2005 “Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction38(2): 131–158. doi:  10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1 [Google Scholar]
38. Stivers, Tanya
    2014 “Sequence organization.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJohn Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 191–209. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
    2011 The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674 [Google Scholar]
40. Stone, Anna
    2016 “Rational Thinkink and Belief in Psychic Abilities: It Depends on Level of Involvement.” Psychological Reports118 (1): 74–89. doi:  10.1177/0033294115625261
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294115625261 [Google Scholar]
41. Storm, Lance, Ken Drinkwater and Anthony L. Jinks
    2017 “A Question on Belief: An Analysis of Item Content in Paranormal Belief Questionnnaires.” Journal of Scientific Exploration31 (2): 187–230.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Szczyrbak, Magdalena
    2018 “Knowing, Unknowing or Believing? Epistemic Stance in Donald Tusk’s Testimony in the Trial on the Polish Air Force Tu-154 Air Crash.” Studies in Polish Linguistics13 (34): 209–236. doi:  10.4467/23005920SPL.18.010.9259
    https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.18.010.9259 [Google Scholar]
43. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2004 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byDeborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heide Hamilton, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Wales, Katie
    2009 “Unnatural conversation in unnatural conversations: speech reporting in the discourse of spiritual mediumship.” Language and Literature18 (4): 347–356. doi:  10.1177/0963947009343844
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009343844 [Google Scholar]
45. Willett, Thomas
    1988 “A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality.” Studies in Language12 (1): 51–97. doi:  10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
46. Wood, Wendy
    2000 “Attitude change. Persuasion and social influence.” Annual Review of Psychology51: 539–570. doi:  10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539 [Google Scholar]
47. Wooffitt, Robin
    2000 “Some properties of interactional organisation of displays of paranormal cognition in psychic-sitter interaction.” Sociology34 (3): 457–479.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Wooffitt, Robin
    2001a “Researching psychic practioners: Conversation analysis.” InDiscourse as Data. A Guide for Analysis, ed. byMargaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor and Simeon J. Yates, 49–92. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wooffitt, Robin
    2001b “A socially organized basis for displays of cognition: Procedural orientation to evidential turns in psychic-sitter interaction.” British Journal of Social Psychology40: 545–563. doi:  10.1348/014466601164975
    https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164975 [Google Scholar]
50. Wooffitt, Robin
    2006 The language of mediums and psychics. Burlington, USA: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Wooffitt, Robin
    2007 “Epistemic authority and neutrality in the discourse of psychic practitioners: Toward a naturalistic parapsychology.” Journal of Parapsychology71 (1/2): 69–104.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Wooffitt, Robin, Nicola Holt and Simone Allistone
    2010 “Introspection as institutional practice: Reflections on the attempt to capture conscious experience in a parapsychology experiment.” Qualitative Research in Psychology7(1): 5–20. doi:  10.1080/14780880903304568
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880903304568 [Google Scholar]
53. Wooffitt, Robin, Clare Jackson, Darren Reed, Yasushi Ohashi and Isaac Hughes
    2013 “Self-identity, authenticity and the other: The spirits and audience management in stage mediumship.” Language and Communication33: 93–105. doi:  10.1016/j.langcom.2013.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.01.003 [Google Scholar]
54. Zuczkowski, Andrzej, Ramona Bongelli, and Ilaria Riccioni
    2017 Epistemic Stance in Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.29
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.29 [Google Scholar]