Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Arnett, Ronald C.
    2017 “Language as the originative house of dialogic ethics.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogueed. by Edda Weigand , 307–317. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1984Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
    https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Buber, Martin
    1923; 1996I and Thou. New York, Simon & Shuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carcassonne, Marie
    2021 “Dialogical approach to a highly controlled discourse: the case of accountants referring to their experience in an international audit firm.” Language and Dialogue11 (1): 83–106. 10.1075/ld.00085.car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00085.car [Google Scholar]
  5. Caronia, Letizia , and Arturo Chieregato
    2016 “Polyphony in a ward: Tracking professional theories in members’ dialogues.” Language and Dialogue6 (3): 395–421. 10.1075/ld.6.3.03car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.3.03car [Google Scholar]
  6. Caronia, Letizia and Vittoria Colla
    2021 “Objects that matter: the hybrid and distributed agency in parent-assisted homework interactions.” Language and Dialogue11 (1): 8–34. 10.1075/ld.00082.car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00082.car [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooren, François
    2015 “In medias res: Communication, existence, and materiality.” Communication Research and Practice1 (4): 307–321. 10.1080/22041451.2015.1110075
    https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2015.1110075 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2018 “Materializing communication: Making the case for a relational ontology.” Journal of Communication68 (2): 278–288. 10.1093/joc/jqx014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx014 [Google Scholar]
  9. Danto, Arthur C.
    1973Analytical Philosophy of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Davidson, Donald
    1963 “Actions, reasons and causes.” Journal of Philosophy60: 685–700. 10.2307/2023177
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2023177 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dollar, Natalie J.
    2021 “Engaging contested community issues: Community dialogue in one USAmerican community.” Language and Dialogue11 (1): 125–150. 10.1075/ld.00087.dol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00087.dol [Google Scholar]
  12. Edmond, Charlotte
    2020 January15. “These are the top risks facing the world in 2020.” World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/01/top-global-risks-report-climate-change-cyberattacks-economic-political/
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gee, James P.
    2017 “Discourse analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand , 62–77. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kohn, Ayelet
    2021 “Self-representation of people with disabilities – ‘Disabling’ the audience, challenging aesthetic norms and employing ironic echoing”. Language and Dialogue11 (1): 59-82. 10.1075/ld.00084.koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00084.koh [Google Scholar]
  15. Latour, Bruno
    2004 “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern.” Critical Inquiry30(2): 225–248. doi:  10.1086/421123
    https://doi.org/10.1086/421123 [Google Scholar]
  16. Létourneau, Alain
    2014 “An example of the plurality of levels of communication ethics analysis in a newspaper article.” InPhilosophy of Communication Ethics: Alterity and the Other, ed. by Ronald C. Arnett and Pat Arneson , 233–252. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2017 “The Bakhtin case: An apparent tension between two traditions in dialogue studies.” Language and Dialogue7 (2): 236–252. 10.1075/ld.7.2.05let
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.2.05let [Google Scholar]
  18. Létourneau, Alain
    2021 “Some challenges of interdisciplinarity: Working with different experts in adaptation to climate change stakeholders’ teams.” Language and Dialogue11 (1): 107–124. 10.1075/ld.00086.let
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00086.let [Google Scholar]
  19. Linell, Per
    2017 “Intersubjectivity in Dialogue.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand , 109–126. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
    1965Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mondada, Lorenza
    2017 “Conversation analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand , 26–45. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Noy, Chaim
    2015Thank you for dying for our country: Commemorative texts and performances in Jerusalem. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199398973.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199398973.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nussbaum, Martha
    2011Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Boston, Belknap at Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200 [Google Scholar]
  24. Parks, Elizabeth S. and Jessica S. Robles
    2021 “Perpetuating ableist constructions of the ‘real world’ through complaints about new communication technologies”. Language and Dialogue11 (1): 35–58. 10.1075/ld.00083.par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00083.par [Google Scholar]
  25. Sen, Amartya
    2004 “Capabilities, lists, and public reason: Continuing the conversation.” Feminist Economics10 (3): 77–80. 10.1080/1354570042000315163
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000315163 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharonova, Svetlana and Elena Avdeeva
    2021 “Dialogue between smart education and classical education.” Language and Dialogue11 (1): 151-171. 10.1075/ld.00088.sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00088.sha [Google Scholar]
  27. Voloshinov, Valentin N.
    1973Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Translated byLadislav Metejka and I.R. Titunik. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Walton, Douglas N.
    1989 “Dialogue theory for critical thinking.” Argumentation3: 169–184. 10.1007/BF00128147
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128147 [Google Scholar]
  29. Weigand, Edda
    2009Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error