1887
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Dialogic matters, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/ld.00081.int-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00081.int
2021-04-22
2021-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnett, Ronald C.
    2017 “Language as the originative house of dialogic ethics.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogueed. by Edda Weigand , 307–317. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1984Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
    https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Buber, Martin
    1923; 1996I and Thou. New York, Simon & Shuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carcassonne, Marie
    2021 “Dialogical approach to a highly controlled discourse: the case of accountants referring to their experience in an international audit firm.” Language and Dialogue11 (1): 83–106. 10.1075/ld.00085.car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00085.car [Google Scholar]
  5. Caronia, Letizia , and Arturo Chieregato
    2016 “Polyphony in a ward: Tracking professional theories in members’ dialogues.” Language and Dialogue6 (3): 395–421. 10.1075/ld.6.3.03car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.3.03car [Google Scholar]
  6. Caronia, Letizia and Vittoria Colla
    2021 “Objects that matter: the hybrid and distributed agency in parent-assisted homework interactions.” Language and Dialogue11 (1): 8–34. 10.1075/ld.00082.car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00082.car [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooren, François
    2015 “In medias res: Communication, existence, and materiality.” Communication Research and Practice1 (4): 307–321. 10.1080/22041451.2015.1110075
    https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2015.1110075 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2018 “Materializing communication: Making the case for a relational ontology.” Journal of Communication68 (2): 278–288. 10.1093/joc/jqx014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx014 [Google Scholar]
  9. Danto, Arthur C.
    1973Analytical Philosophy of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Davidson, Donald
    1963 “Actions, reasons and causes.” Journal of Philosophy60: 685–700. 10.2307/2023177
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2023177 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dollar, Natalie J.
    2021 “Engaging contested community issues: Community dialogue in one USAmerican community.” Language and Dialogue11 (1): 125–150. 10.1075/ld.00087.dol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00087.dol [Google Scholar]
  12. Edmond, Charlotte
    2020 January15. “These are the top risks facing the world in 2020.” World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/01/top-global-risks-report-climate-change-cyberattacks-economic-political/
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gee, James P.
    2017 “Discourse analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand , 62–77. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kohn, Ayelet
    2021 “Self-representation of people with disabilities – ‘Disabling’ the audience, challenging aesthetic norms and employing ironic echoing”. Language and Dialogue11 (1): 59-82. 10.1075/ld.00084.koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00084.koh [Google Scholar]
  15. Latour, Bruno
    2004 “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern.” Critical Inquiry30(2): 225–248. doi:  10.1086/421123
    https://doi.org/10.1086/421123 [Google Scholar]
  16. Létourneau, Alain
    2014 “An example of the plurality of levels of communication ethics analysis in a newspaper article.” InPhilosophy of Communication Ethics: Alterity and the Other, ed. by Ronald C. Arnett and Pat Arneson , 233–252. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2017 “The Bakhtin case: An apparent tension between two traditions in dialogue studies.” Language and Dialogue7 (2): 236–252. 10.1075/ld.7.2.05let
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.2.05let [Google Scholar]
  18. Létourneau, Alain
    2021 “Some challenges of interdisciplinarity: Working with different experts in adaptation to climate change stakeholders’ teams.” Language and Dialogue11 (1): 107–124. 10.1075/ld.00086.let
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00086.let [Google Scholar]
  19. Linell, Per
    2017 “Intersubjectivity in Dialogue.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand , 109–126. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
    1965Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mondada, Lorenza
    2017 “Conversation analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand , 26–45. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Noy, Chaim
    2015Thank you for dying for our country: Commemorative texts and performances in Jerusalem. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199398973.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199398973.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nussbaum, Martha
    2011Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Boston, Belknap at Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200 [Google Scholar]
  24. Parks, Elizabeth S. and Jessica S. Robles
    2021 “Perpetuating ableist constructions of the ‘real world’ through complaints about new communication technologies”. Language and Dialogue11 (1): 35–58. 10.1075/ld.00083.par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00083.par [Google Scholar]
  25. Sen, Amartya
    2004 “Capabilities, lists, and public reason: Continuing the conversation.” Feminist Economics10 (3): 77–80. 10.1080/1354570042000315163
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000315163 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharonova, Svetlana and Elena Avdeeva
    2021 “Dialogue between smart education and classical education.” Language and Dialogue11 (1): 151-171. 10.1075/ld.00088.sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00088.sha [Google Scholar]
  27. Voloshinov, Valentin N.
    1973Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Translated byLadislav Metejka and I.R. Titunik. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Walton, Douglas N.
    1989 “Dialogue theory for critical thinking.” Argumentation3: 169–184. 10.1007/BF00128147
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128147 [Google Scholar]
  29. Weigand, Edda
    2009Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00081.int
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error