Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



It has been two decades since the social-material turn in social interaction studies proved the heuristic limits of a logocentric analytical geography. In this paper, we focus on the performative function of objects in an underexplored learning activity: parent-assisted homework. Adopting a Conversation Analysis informed approach complemented by the ventriloquial perspective on communication, we illustrate how parent-assisted homework is accomplished through the multiple resources in the semiotic field. Particularly, we show how participants orient to and exploit the agency of materiality in interaction. In the conclusion we raise a socio-pedagogical issue concerning the cultural capital embedded in the learning environment as well as the parents’ competence in recognizing and exploiting it in ways that are aligned with the school culture.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aakhus, Mark
    2007 “Communication as Design.” Communication Monographs74 (1): 112–117. 10.1080/03637750701196383
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701196383 [Google Scholar]
  2. Akrich, Madeline and Bruno Latour
    1992 “A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies.” InShaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law , 259–264. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Amadini, Monica
    2019 “Costruire Corresponsabilità Educativa nei ‘Tempi per le Famiglie’: Ruoli, Incontri, Processi [“Building Co-responsibility in the ‘Times for Families’: Roles, Meetings and Processes.”] InComunità e Corresponsabilità Educativa. Soggetti, Compiti, Strategie. [Communities and Educational Co-responsibility. Subjects, Tasks and Strategies, ed. by Monica Amadini , Simona Ferrari , Simonetta Polenghi , 17–28. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Arcidiacono, Francesco
    2013 “The Family Goes to School.” InCrossing Boundaries. Intercontextual Dynamics between Family and School, ed. by Koji Komatsu , Antonio Iannaccone , and Giuseppina Marsico , 83–107. Charlotte, NC: IAP.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnold, Jeanne E.
    2013 “Mountains of Things.” InFast-Forward Family. Home, Work, and Relationships in Middle-Class America, ed. by Elinor Ochs , and Tamar Kremer-Sadlik , 67–93. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barbanti, Camilla
    2019Che Cosa Fanno gli Oggetti? Una Ricerca Pedagogica sulla Materialità in Atto in una Scuola Steineriana [What Do the Objects Do? Pedagogical Research on Materiality in Place in a Steinerian School]. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Barley, William C. , Paul M. Leonardi , and Diane E. Bailey
    2012 “Engineering Objects for Collaboration: Strategies for Ambiguity and Clarity at Knowledge Boundaries.” Human Communication Research38 (3): 280–308. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2012.01430.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01430.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Barone, Pierangelo
    1997La Materialità Educativa. L’Orizzonte Materialista dell’Epistemologia Pedagogica e la Clinica della Formazione. [The Educational Materiality. The Materialistic Horizon in Pedagogical Epistemology and the Formation Clinics]. Milano: Unicopli.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Barone, Pierangelo , Alessandro Ferrante , and Daniele Sartori
    (eds) 2014Formazione e Post-umanesimo. Sentieri Pedagogici nell’Età della Tecnica [Education and Post-humanism. Pedagogical Paths in the Technical Age]. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bazzanella, Carla , Cristina Bosco , Alessandro Garcea , Barbara Gili Fivela , Johanna Miecznikowski , and Francesca Tini Brunozzi
    2007 “Italian allora, French alors: Functions, Convergences and Divergences.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics6: 9–30. 10.5565/rev/catjl.122
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.122 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1986 “The Forms of Capital.” InHandbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. by John G. Richardson , 241–258. New York: Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bronfenbrenner, Urie
    1979The Ecology of Human Development. Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Brummans, Boris
    2007 “Death by Document: Tracing the Agency of a Text.” Qualitative Inquiry13 (5): 711–727. 10.1177/1077800407301185
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407301185 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bruni, Attila
    2005 “Shadowing Software and Clinical Records: On the Ethnography of Non-Humans and Heterogeneous Contexts.” Organization12 (3): 357–378. 10.1177/1350508405051272
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405051272 [Google Scholar]
  15. Budach, Gabriele , Catherine Kell , and Donna Patrick
    2015 “Introduction: Objects and Language in Trans-contextual Communication.” Social Semiotics25: 387–400. 10.1080/10350330.2015.1059579
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1059579 [Google Scholar]
  16. Callon, Michel , Arie Rip , and John Law
    1986Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. Sociology of Science in the Real World. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Caron, André H. , and Letizia Caronia
    2001 “Active Users and Active Objects. The Mutual Construction of Families and Communication Technologies.” Convergence7 (3): 38–61. 10.1177/135485650100700305
    https://doi.org/10.1177/135485650100700305 [Google Scholar]
  18. Caron, André H. and Letizia Caronia
    2007Moving Cultures. Mobile Communication in Everyday Life. Montreal-Kingston-London: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Caronia, Letizia
    2011Fenomenologia dell’educazione. Intenzionalità, Cultura e Conoscenza in Pedagogia [Phenomenology of Education. Intentionality, Culture and Knowledge in Pedagogy]. Milano: Franco Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2014 “Talking Objects: The Recording Devices as Participants in the Research Setting.” Paper presented atICA Annual Conference. Seattle, May 22–26, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2015 “Totem and Taboo: The Embarrassing Epistemic Work of Things in the Research Setting.” Qualitative Research15: 141–165. 10.1177/1468794113517392
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113517392 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2019 “Following and Analyzing an Artifact: Culture-through-Things.” InMethodological and Ontological Principles of Observation and Analysis, ed. by François Cooren and Fabienne Malbois , 112–138. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Caronia, Letizia and François Cooren
    2014 “Decentering our analytical position: The dialogicity of things.” Discourse & Communication8: 41–61. 10.1177/1750481313503226
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313503226 [Google Scholar]
  24. Caronia, Letizia and Chiara Dalledonne Vandini
    2019 “Assessing a (gifted) child in parent-teacher conference: Participants’ resources to pursue (and resist) a no-problem trajectory”. Language and Dialogue9: 125–148. 10.1075/ld.00035.car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00035.car [Google Scholar]
  25. Cicourel, Aaron
    1980 “Three Models of Discursive Analysis: The Role of Social Structure.” Discourse Processes3: 101–132. 10.1080/01638538009544482
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538009544482 [Google Scholar]
  26. 1992 “The Interpenetration of Communicative Contexts: Examples from Medical Encounters.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti , and Charles Goodwin , 291–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Cole, Michael
    1995 “Culture and Cognitive Development: From Cross-cultural Research to Creating Systems of Cultural Mediation.” Culture and Psychology1(1): 25–54. 10.1177/1354067X9511003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9511003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Contini, Mariagrazia
    (ed) 2012Dis-alleanze nei Contesti Educativi [Dis-alliances in Educational Contexts]. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Cook-Gumperz, Jenny , William A. Corsaro , and Jürgen Streeck
    (eds) 1986Children’s Worlds and Children’s Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110864212
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110864212 [Google Scholar]
  30. Cooren, François
    2006 “The Organizational World as a Plenum of Agencies.” InCommunication as organizing: Empirical and Theoretical Explorations in the Dynamic of Text and Conversation, ed. by François Cooren , James R. Taylor , and Elizabeth J. Van Every , 81–100. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2010Action and Agency in Language: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2012 “Communication Theory at the Center: Ventriloquism and the Communicative Constitution of Reality.” Journal of Communication62: 1–20. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2011.01622.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Cooren, François and Nicholas Bencherki
    2010 “How Things do Things with Words: Ventriloquism, Passion and Technology.” Encyclopaideia15 (28): 35–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Cooren, François , Gail Fairhurst , and Romain Huët
    2012 “Why Matter Always Matters in (Organizational) Communication.” InMateriality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, ed. by Paul M. Leonardi , Bonnie A. Nardi , and Jannis Kallinikos , 297–315. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664054.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664054.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
  35. Cooren, François and Fabienne Malbois
    2019 “How to Follow and Analyze a Diversity of Beings. An Introduction.” InMethodological and Ontological Principles of Observation and Analysis, ed. by François Cooren , and Fabienne Malbois , 112–138. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly and Eugene Rochberg-Halton
    1981The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167611
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167611 [Google Scholar]
  37. Douglas, Mary and Baron Isherwood
    [1979] 1996The World of Goods. Toward an Anthropology of Consumption. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Duranti, Alessandro
    (ed) 2004A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Erickson, Frederick
    2010 “The Neglected Listener: Issues of Theory and Practice in Transcription from Video in Interaction Analysis”. InNew Adventures in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Jürgen Streeck , 243–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.196.11eri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.196.11eri [Google Scholar]
  40. Fenwick, Tara and Richard Edwards
    2010Actor-network Theory in Education. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203849088
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203849088 [Google Scholar]
  41. Fenwick, Tara , Richard Edwards , and Peter Sawchuk
    2011Emerging Approaches to Educational Research. Tracing the Socio-material. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Fenwick, Tara and Richard Edwards
    (eds) 2012Researching Education Through Actor-network Theory. London: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118275825
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118275825 [Google Scholar]
  43. Fenwick, Tara and Paola Landri
    2012 “Materialities, Textures and Pedagogies: Sociomaterial Assemblages in Education.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society20(1): 1–7. 10.1080/14681366.2012.649421
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.649421 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ferrante, Alessandro
    2016Materialità e Azione Educativa [Materiality and Educational Action]. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Forsberg, Lucas
    2007 “Homework as Serious Family Business: Power and Subjectivity in Negotiations about School Assignments in Swedish Families.” British Journal of Sociology of Education28(2): 209–222. 10.1080/01425690701192695
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690701192695 [Google Scholar]
  46. Foucault, Michel
    1975Surveiller et Punir. Naissance de la Prison [Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison]. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Garfinkel, Harold
    2002Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Garfinkel, Harold and Lawrence Wieder
    1992 “Two Incommensurable, Asymmetrically Alternate Technologies of Social Analysis.” InText in Context: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by Graham Watson , and Robert M. Seiler , 175–206. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Gibson, James J.
    1977 “The Theory of Affordances.” InPerceiving, Acting and Knowing, ed. by Robert Shaw , and John Bransford , 127–143. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 1979The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Goodwin, Charles
    1994 “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist96(3): 606–633. 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2000 “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics32(10): 1489–1522. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
  53. 2007 “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities”, Discourse & Society18(1): 53–73. 10.1177/0957926507069457
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2011 “Contextures of Action.” InEmbodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jürgen Streek , Charles Goodwin , and Curt LeBaron , 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    2004 “Participation.” InA Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti , 222–243. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Goodwin, Marjorie H.
    1990He-said-she-said: Talk as Social Organization Among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Graesch, Anthony P.
    2013 “At Home.” InFast-Forward Family. Home, Work, and Relationships in Middle-Class America, ed. by Elinor Ochs , and Tamar Kremer-Sadlik , 27–47. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Heath, Christian and Paul Luff
    2013 “Embodied Action and Organizational Activity.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell , and Tanya Stivers , 283–306. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Heritage, John
    2012a “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45: 25–50. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2012b “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45: 1–25. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
  61. Holliday, Adrian
    1999 “Small Cultures.” Applied Linguistics20(2): 237–264. 10.1093/applin/20.2.237
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.2.237 [Google Scholar]
  62. Hoover-Dempsey, Kathleen V. , Angela C. Battiato , Joan M. T. Walker , Richard P. Reed , Jennifer M. DeJong , and Kathleen P. Jones
    2001 “Parental involvement in homework.” Educational Psychologist36(3): 195–209. 10.1207/S15326985EP3603_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_5 [Google Scholar]
  63. Hutchby, Ian
    2001 “Technologies, Texts and Affordances.” Sociology35 (2): 441–456. 10.1177/S0038038501000219
    https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219 [Google Scholar]
  64. Iori, Vanna
    1996Lo spazio vissuto [The lived space]. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 2002 “Il Demone del Tempo [The Demon of the Time].” Adultità17: 77–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner , 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  67. Jenks, Christopher J.
    2011Transcribing Talk and Interaction: Issues in the Representation of Communication Data. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.165
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.165 [Google Scholar]
  68. Landowski, Erik and Gianfanco Marrone
    (eds) 2002La Società degli Oggetti. Problemi di Interoggettività [The Society of Objects. Problems of Interobjectivity]. Rome: Meltemi.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Landri, Paola and Assunta Viteritti
    2016 “Introduzione: le Masse Mancanti in Educazione [Introduction: the Missing Masses in Education].” Scuola Democratica. Learning for Democracy7(1): 7–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Latour, Bruno
    1987Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 1996 “On Interobjectivity.” Mind, Culture and Activity3(4): 228–245. 10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2 [Google Scholar]
  72. 1999Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 2002 “Una Sociologia senza Oggetto? Note sull’Interoggettività [A Sociology without Objects? Notes on Interobjectivity].” InLa Società degli Oggetti, ed. by Eric Landowski , and Gianfranco Marrone , 203–229. Roma: Meltemi.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. 2005Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 2013An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Lave, Jean , and Etienne Wenger
    1991Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  77. Mantegazza, Raffaele
    1998Filosofia dell’Educazione [Philosophy of Education]. Milano: Mondadori.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. 2001Unica Rosa. Cinque Saggi sul Materialismo Pedagogico [Only Rose. Five Essays on Pedagogical Materialism]. Milano: Ghibli.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Marsico, Giuseppina
    2013 “Moving between the Social Spaces. Conditions for Boundaries Crossing.” InCrossing Boundaries. Intercontextual Dyamics between Family and School, ed. by Koji Komatsu , Antonio Iannaccone , and Giuseppina Marsico , 361–374. Charlotte, NC: IAP.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Massa, Riccardo
    1986Le Tecniche e i Corpi. Verso una Scienza dell’Educazione [The Tecniques and the Bodies. Toward a Science of Education]. Milano: Unicopli.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 1987Educare o Istruire? La Fine della Pedagogia nella Cultura Contemporanea [Educating or Instructing? The End of Pedagogy in Contemporary Culture]. Milano: Unicopli.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 1990 “Dalla Scienza Pedagogica alla Clinica della Formazione [From the Pedagogical Science to the Formation Clinics].” InIstituzioni di Pedagogia e Scienze dell’Educazione [Institutions of Pedagogy and Education Sciences], ed. by Riccardo Massa , 561–593. Roma, Bari: Laterza.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. McGregor, Jane
    2004 “Spatiality and the Place of the Material in Schools.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society12(3): 347–372. 10.1080/14681360400200207
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360400200207 [Google Scholar]
  84. Mondada, Lorenza
    2011 “The Systematic Organization of Concurrent Courses of Action within Multi-activity.” InEmbodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jürgen Streeck , Charles Goodwin , and Curtis LeBaron , 207–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Montessori, Maria
    1950La Scoperta del Bambino [The Discovery of the Child]. Milano: Garzanti.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Norman, Donald A.
    1988The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Oury, Fernand , and Aida Vasquez
    1967 “Vers une Pédagogie Institutionnelle [Toward an Institutional Pedagogy]”. Recherches7: 243–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Pati, Luigi
    2019Scuola e Famiglia. Relazione e Corresponsabilità Educativa [School and Family: Relationship and Educational Co-responsibility]. Brescia: Scholé.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Pickering, Andrew
    1995The Mangle of Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  90. Pillet-Shore, Danielle
    2012 “The Problems with Praise in Parent-teacher Interaction”, Communication Monographs79(2):181–204. 10.1080/03637751.2012.672998
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.672998 [Google Scholar]
  91. 2015 “Being a ‘Good Parent’ in Parent–Teacher Conferences”, Journal of Communication65(2): 373–395. 10.1111/jcom.12146
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12146 [Google Scholar]
  92. Pontecorvo, Clotilde
    1993La Condivisione della Conoscenza [The Sharing of Knowledge]. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. 1999Manuale di Psicologia dell’Educazione [Handbook of Psychology of Education]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Pontecorvo, Clotilde , Anna M. Ajello , and Cristina Zucchermaglio
    1991Discutendo si Impara [By Discussing, You Learn]. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. 1995I Contesti Sociali dell’Apprendimento [The Social Contexts for Learning]. Milano: LED.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Pontecorvo, Clotilde , Alessandra Fasulo , and Laura Sterponi
    2001 “Mutual Apprentices: The Making of Parenthood and Childhood in Family Dinner Conversations.” Human Development44: 342–363. 10.1159/000046155
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000046155 [Google Scholar]
  97. Pontecorvo, Clotilde , Vivian Liberati , and Camilla Monaco
    2013 “How School Enters Family Everyday Life.” InCrossing Boundaries. Intercontextual Dyamics between Family and School, ed. by Koji Komatsu , Antonio Iannaccone , and Giuseppina Marsico , 3–34. Charlotte, NC: IAP.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Riva, Mariagrazia
    2016 “Per un’Ermeneutica delle Pratiche Educative Concrete. Il contributo della Psicoanalisi allo Studio della Materialità Educativa [For an Hermeneutics of Concrete Educational Practices. The Contribution of Psychoanalysis to the Study of Educational Materiality].” Scuola Democratica. Learning for Democracy7(1): 249–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Roehl, Tobias
    2012 “Disassembling the Classroom. An Ethnographic Approach to the Materiality of Education.” Ethnography and Education7(1): 109–126. 10.1080/17457823.2012.661591
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2012.661591 [Google Scholar]
  100. Salomone, Igor
    1997Il Setting Pedagogico. Vincoli e Possibilità per l’Interazione Educativa [The Pedagogical Setting. Constraints and Possibilites for Learning Interaction]. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1987 “Between Macro and Micro: Contexts and Other Connections.” InThe Micro-Macro Link, ed. by Jeffrey C. Alexander , Bernhard Giesen , Richard Munch , and Neil J. Smelser , 207–234. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. 1997 “Whose Text? Whose Context?”. Discourse & Society8:165–187. 10.1177/0957926597008002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008002002 [Google Scholar]
  103. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , and Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening up closings”. Semiotica, 8(4): 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  104. Stevanovic, Melisa , and Anssi Peräkylä
    2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45:3: 297–321. 10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260 [Google Scholar]
  105. Streeck, Jürgen
    2010 “New Adventures in Language and Social Interaction”. InNew Adventures in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Jürgen Streeck , 1–8. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.196.01str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.196.01str [Google Scholar]
  106. 2011 “The Changing Meanings of Things: Found Objects and Inscriptions in Social Interaction”. InEmbodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jürgen Streeck , Charles Goodwin , and Curtis LeBaron , 67–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Streeck, Jurgen , Charles Goodwin , and Curtis LeBaron
    (eds) 2011Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Taylor, James and Elizabeth Van Every
    2011The Situated Organization. Case Studies in the Pragmatics of Communication Research. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Tramma, Sergio
    2009Che Cos’è l’Educazione Informale? [What is Informal Education?] Roma: Carocci Editore.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Vygotskij, Lev S.
    1962 [1934]Thought and Language. Cambridge, MASS: MIT Press. 10.1037/11193‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-000 [Google Scholar]
  111. Weininger, Elliot B. , and Annette Lareau
    2003 “Translating Bourdieu into the American Context: the Question of Social Class and Family-school Relations.” Poetics31: 375–402. 10.1016/S0304‑422X(03)00034‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00034-2 [Google Scholar]
  112. Wertsch, James V.
    1985Vygotsky and the Social Formation of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  113. 1991 “A Sociocultural Approach to Socially Shared Cognition.” InPerspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick , John M. Levine , and Stephanie D. Teasley , 85–100. American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10096‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-004 [Google Scholar]
  114. Wertsch, James V. , and Leslie J. Rupert
    1993 “The Authority of Cultural Tools in a Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Agency.” Cognition and Instruction11(3&4): 227–239. 10.1080/07370008.1993.9649022
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1993.9649022 [Google Scholar]
  115. Wingard, Leah , and Lucas Forsberg
    2009 “Parent Involvement in Children’s Homework in American and Swedish Dual-earner Families.” Journal of Pragmatics41: 1576–1595. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.010 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error