1887
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of dialogue as an alternative to debate and argument for engaging contested community issues. Treating dialogue as a communication practice, I draw on ethnography of communication, cultural communication theory, and cultural discourse analysis to describe and interpret how participants practiced community dialogue as a communication event comprised of sequences of listening and verbally responding. When topics and identities were elaborated upon and socially negotiated through personal communication in the form of narratives and emotional responses, participants reported effective dialogue. These sequences were dialogic moments partially due to the dialectical tension between Americans’ once predictable civic routine of public expression of individual’s beliefs and the process of dialogue featured in our War and Peace dialogue workshop.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00087.dol
2021-04-22
2021-05-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agne, Robert R.
    2018 “‘You’re not listening’: Negotiating and problematizing ideal interaction through metatalk about listening in the Waco standoff.” Western Journal of Communication82(3): 356–375. 10.1080/10570314.2017.1355979
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1355979 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agne, Robert R. and Karen Tracy
    2001 “‘Bible babble’: Naming the interactional trouble at Waco.” Discourse Studies3(3): 269–294. 10.1177/1461445601003003002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003003002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, Rob , Leslie Baxter , and Kenneth N. Cissna
    (eds) 2004Dialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage. 10.4135/9781483328683
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328683 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnett, Ronald C.
    2012 “Beyond dialogue: Levinas and otherwise than the I–Thou.” Language and Dialogue2(1): 140–155. 10.1075/ld.2.1.08arn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.2.1.08arn [Google Scholar]
  5. Bahktin, Mikhail
    1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, Caryle Emerson and Michael Holquist (eds), trans. Vern McGee, Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barge, Kevin J. and Martin Little
    2002 “Dialogical wisdom, communicative practice, and organizational life.” Communication Theory24: 375–397. 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2002.tb00275.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00275.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Baraldi, Claudio and Federico Farini
    2011 “Dialogic mediation in international groups of adolescents.” Language and Dialogue1(2): 207–232. 10.1075/ld.1.2.03bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.1.2.03bar [Google Scholar]
  8. Baraldi, Claudio and Vittorio Iervese
    2010 “Dialogic mediation in conflict resolution education.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly27(4): 423–445. 10.1002/crq.20005
    https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.20005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baxter, Leslie
    2011 “A Dialogic Approach to Interpersonal/Family Communication.” InDistinctive Qualities in Communication Research, ed. by Donal Carbaugh and Patricia Buzzanell , 13–31. New York & London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Baxter, Leslie and Dawn Braithwaite
    2010 “Relational Dialectics Theory, Applied.” InNew Directions in Interpersonal Communication Research, ed. by Sandi W. Smith and Steven R. Wilson , 48–66. Los Angeles: Sage. 10.4135/9781483349619.n3
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349619.n3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Baxter, Leslie and Judith Montgomery
    1996Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bellah, Robert N. , Richard Madsen , William M. Sullivan , Ann Swidler , and Steven M. Tipton
    2007Habits of the Heart, With a New Preface: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Black, Laura W.
    2005 “Building connections while thinking together: By-products of employee training in dialogue.” Western Journal of Communication69(3): 273–292. 10.1080/10570310500202421
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310500202421 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2008 “Deliberation, storytelling, and dialogic moments.” Communication Theory18(1): 93–116. 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2007.00315.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00315.x [Google Scholar]
  15. 2009 “Listening to the city: Difference, identity, and storytelling in online deliberative groups.” The International Journal of Public Participation3(2): 4. doi:  10.16997/jdd.76
    https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.76 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bohm, David
    1996On Dialogue. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Boromisza-Habashi, David
    2007 “Freedom from expression, hate speech, and models of personhood in Hungarian political discourse.” Communication Law Review7(1): 54–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2012Speaking Hatefully: Culture, Communication, and Political Action in Hungary. State College: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Brown, Judith and David Isaacs
    2005The World Cafe. San-Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Buber, Martin
    1970I and Thou ( W. Kaufmann , Trans.). New York: Scribner.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Carbaugh, Donal
    1989 “Fifty terms for talk: A cross-cultural Study.” International and Intercultural Communication Anal13: 93–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1996Situating Selves: The Communication of Social Identities in American Scenes. Albany: SUNY.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2005Cultures in Conversation. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2007 “Cultural Discourse Analysis: The Investigation of Communication Practices with Special Attention to Intercultural Encounters.” Journal of Intercultural Communication Research36(3): 167–182. 10.1080/17475750701737090
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750701737090 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2017 “TFT Take 2.” InThe Handbook of Communication in Cross-cultural Perspective, ed. by Donal Carbaugh , 5–28. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Carbaugh, Donal and Eean Grimshaw
    . Forthcoming. “‘Two different kinds of life’: A cultural analysis of Blackfeet discourse.” InApproaches to Discourse Analysis ed. by Cynthia Gordon . Washington DC: Georgetown University.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Carbaugh, Donal and Nedezhda Sotirova
    2015 “Language Use and Culture.” InThe Sage Encyclopedia of Intercultural Competence, ed. by Janet Bennett , 581–585. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Community Dialogue Project
  29. Dollar, Natalie
    2019 “Dialogue as cultural radical.” Paper presented at theannual Northwest Communication Association Conference, Couer d’Alene (ID).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fitch, Kristine L.
    1998Culture, Communication and Interpersonal Connection: Speaking Relationally. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fitch, Kristine
    2003 “Cultural persuadables.” Communication Theory13(1): 100–123. 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2003.tb00284.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00284.x [Google Scholar]
  32. Garrett, Mary M.
    1993 “Wit, power, and oppositional groups: A case study of ‘pure talk.’” Quarterly Journal of Speech79(3): 303–318. 10.1080/00335639309384037
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639309384037 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hall, Brad and Mutsumi Noguchi
    1995 “Engaging in kenson: An extended case study of one form of common sense.” Human Relations48(10): 1129–1147. 10.1177/001872679504801002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504801002 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hymes, Dell
    1962 “The Ethnography of Speaking.” InAnthropology and Human Behavior, ed. by Thomas Gladwin and William Sturtevant , 15–53. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Janovic, Spoma and Roy V. Wood
    2006 “Communication ethics and ethical culture: A study of the ethics initiative in Denver city government.” Journal of Applied Communication Research34(4): 386–405. 10.1080/00909880600908633
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880600908633 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kampf, Zohar and Tamar Katriel
    2016 “Political Condemnations: Public Speech Acts and the Moralization of Discourse.” InThe Handbook of Communication in Cross-Cultural Perspective, ed. by Donal Carbaugh , 312–324. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Katriel, Tamar
    2004Dialogic Moments: From Soul Talks to Talk Radio in Israeli Culture. Detroit (MI): Wayne State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Leighter, Jay and Laura W. Black
    2010 “I’m just raising the question”: Terms for talk and practical metadiscursive argument in public meetings.” Western Journal of Communication74(5): 547–568. 10.1080/10570314.2010.512281
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2010.512281 [Google Scholar]
  39. Leighter, Jay and Theresa Castor
    2009 “What are we going to “talk about” in this public meeting?: An examination of talk about communication in the North Omaha Development Project.” The International Journal of Public Participation3(2): 57–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Létourneau, Alaine
    2017 “The Bakhtin case: An apparent tension between two traditions in dialogue studies.” Language and Dialogue7(2): 236–252. 10.1075/ld.7.2.05let
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.2.05let [Google Scholar]
  41. 2019 “Dialogue considered as a social ensemble of voices.” Language and Dialogue9(3): 333–348. 10.1075/ld.00046.let
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00046.let [Google Scholar]
  42. Lindell, Per
    2017 “Dialogue, dialogicity and interactivity: A conceptually bewildering field?” Language and Dialogue7(3): 301–335. 10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin [Google Scholar]
  43. Matusov, Eugene
    2001Journey into Dialogic Pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Noy, Chaim
    2017 “Ethnography of Communication.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, ed. by Jorg Matthes , Christine S. Davis and Robert F. Potter , 1–11. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0089
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0089 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pearce, Kimberly
    2010Public Engagement and Civic Maturity: A Public Dialogue Consortium Perspective. Lulu Enterprises, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Pearce, W. Barnett and Kimberly Pearce
    2004 “Taking a communication perspective on dialogue.” InDialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, ed. by Rob Anderson , Leslie Baxter and Kenneth Cissna , 39–56. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage. 10.4135/9781483328683.n3
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328683.n3 [Google Scholar]
  47. Philipsen, Gerry
    1992Speaking Culturally: Explorations in Social Communication. Albany: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 1997 “A Theory of Speech Codes.” InDeveloping Communication Theories, ed. by Gerry Philipsen and Terri Albrecht , 119–156. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2002 “Cultural Communication.” InHandbook of International and Intercultural Communication, ed. by William Gudykunst and Bella Mody , 51–67. Newbury Park (CA): Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Philipsen, Gerry , Lisa Coutu , and Patricia Covarrubias
    2005 “Speech Codes Theory: Restatement, Revisions, and Response to Criticisms.” InTheorizing About Intercultural Interaction, ed. by William Gudykunst , 55–68. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Public Dialogue Consortium
    Public Dialogue Consortium. https://publicdialogue.org/
  52. Scollo, Michelle
    2011 “Cultural approaches to discourse analysis: A theoretical and methodological consideration with special focus on Donal Carbaugh’s cultural discourse theory.” Discourse Studies6(1): 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Spano, Shawn
    2001Public Dialogue and Participatory Democracy. Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Stewart, John and Karen Zediker
    2000 “Dialogue as tensional, ethical practice.” Southern Journal of Communication65(2–3): 224–242. 10.1080/10417940009373169
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940009373169 [Google Scholar]
  55. Tocqueville, Alex De
    1935/1945Democracy in America (trans Gerad Bevan). London: Penguin Books, Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wegerif, Rupert
    2007Dialogic Education and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning. Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑71142‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71142-3 [Google Scholar]
  57. Weigand, Edda
    1989Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik. 2nd rev. ed. 2003 Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111357799
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357799 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2017 “IADA history: The unity of dialogue and its multiple faces.” Language and Dialogue7(1): 63–79. 10.1075/ld.7.1.05wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.1.05wei [Google Scholar]
  59. Witteborn, Saskia and Qian Huang
    2015 “Diaosi [underdog talk] as a Way of Relating in Contemporary China.” InThe Handbook of Communication in Cross-Cultural Perspective, ed. by Donal Carbaugh , 142–152. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Witteborn, Saskia and Leah Sprain
    2009 “Grouping processes in a public meeting from an ethnography of communication and cultural discourse analysis perspective.” The International Journal of Public Participation3(2): 14–35.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00087.dol
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error