Abstract
Abstract
The aim of this article is to present text markers as a dialogical mechanism in the French language used in a
legal setting. The dialogue between the court and the public administration takes place primarily through a judgment’s
justification. On the other hand, the dialogue between the authorities and the court takes place in two possible variants: as a
response to the parties allegations raised in the complaint or cassation complaint or as arguments formulated in the cassation
complaint. Analyzing the decisions issued by the French Cour de cassation, one may notice that this material is
characterized by three aspects: intentional, conventional and institutional, as it refers to a set of established beliefs about
the nature of the world of a given community.
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Article metrics loading...
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00096.dol
2021-06-14
2024-03-28
-
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00096.dol
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Full text loading...
References
-
Adam, Jean-Michel
2013 “Les
consécutives intensives : un schéma syntaxique commun à plusieurs genres de
discours.” Linx64–65: 115–131.
[Google Scholar]
-
Aijmer, Karin
2007 “The
interface between discourse and grammar: The fact is
that.” In
Connectives as Discourse
Landmarks, ed. by
Agnès Celle, Ruth Huart, 31–46. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
10.1075/pbns.161.05aij
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.161.05aij
[Google Scholar]
-
Aijmer, Karin
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.05aij
[Google Scholar]
-
Asher, Nicholas, Farah Benamara and Yvette
Yannick, Mathieu
2009 “Appraisal
of opinion expressions in discourse.”
Lingvisticae
Investigationes32(2): 279–292.
10.1075/li.32.2.10ash
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.32.2.10ash
[Google Scholar]
-
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
1981 “The Dialogic Imagination: Four essays.” Ed. byMichael Holquist, translated byCaryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Austin: Texas University Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
1986 “Speech Genres and Other Late Essays.” Ed. byCaryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, translated byVern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Austin: Texas University Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Bartmiński, Jerzy, Stanisława Niebrzegowska-Bartmińska
2009 Tekstologia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo
Naukowe PWN.
[Google Scholar]
-
Bazerman, Charles
1994 “Systems
of Genre and the Enactment of Social Intentions.” InGenre and the
new rhetoric, ed. byAviva Freedman and Peter Medway, 79–101. London: Taylor
& Francis.
[Google Scholar]
-
Bazerman, Charles
2009 “How
does Science Come to Speak in the Courts? Citations, Intertexts, Expert Witnesses, Consequential Facts and
Reasoning.” Law and Contemporary
Problems, 72:1: 91–120.
[Google Scholar]
-
Bazerman, Charles and James Paradis
1991 Textual
Dynamics of the Professions. Madison: University of
Wisconsin Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Bell, Allan
https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X
[Google Scholar]
-
Bell, Allan
2001 “Back
in style : Reworking audience design.” InStyle and Sociolinguistic
Variation, ed. byPenelope Eckert and John
R. Rickford, 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Bhatia, Vijay
1993 Analysing
Genre: Language Use in Professional
Settings. London: Longman.
[Google Scholar]
-
Bhatia, Vijay
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00066
[Google Scholar]
-
Boch, Françoise, Francis Grossmann, and Fanny Rinck
2007 “Conformément
à nos attentes…’, ou l’étude des marqueurs de convergence/divergence dans l’article de
linguistique.”
Revue Française de Linguistique
Appliquée12(2): 109–122.
10.3917/rfla.122.0109
https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.122.0109
[Google Scholar]
-
Conrad, Susan and Douglas Biber
2000 “Adverbial
Marking of Stance in Speech and Writing.” InEvaluation in Text:
Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. bySusan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 56–73. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Dahl, Östen
2004 “The
Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity.” Studies in Language Companion
Series, 71, Stockholm
University.
[Google Scholar]
-
Dauter, Bogusław
2011 Metodyka pracy sędziego sądu administracyjnego [The methodology of
work of an administrative court
judge]. Warszawa: Lexis-Nexis.
[Google Scholar]
-
Dudley-Evans, Tony and Maggie
Jo
St John
1998 Developments
in English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Duszak, Anna
1998 Tekst, dyskurs, komunikacja międzykulturowa [Text, discourse,
intercultural communication]. Warszawa.
[Google Scholar]
-
Duszak, Anna
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90003-5
[Google Scholar]
-
Fairclough, Norman
1993 Discourse
and Social
Change. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
[Google Scholar]
-
Fakhri, Ahmed
2009 “Rhetorical
Variation in Arabic Academic Discourse: Humanities versus Law.”
Journal of
Pragmatics41: 306–24.
10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.001
[Google Scholar]
-
Halliday, Michael Alexander
Kirkwood
1994/ [2004] (3rd
ed.). An Introduction to Functional
Grammar. London: Edward
Arnold.
[Google Scholar]
-
Halliday, Michael Alexander
Kirkwood and Ruqaiya Hasan
1989 Language,
Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective (2nd
ed.). Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Hunston, Susan and Geoff Thompson
2000 Evaluation
in Text. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Hyland, Ken
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5
[Google Scholar]
-
Hyland, Ken
1999 “Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles.” InWriting: Texts, Processes and Practices, ed. byChristopher N. Candlin, Ken Hyland, 99–121. London: Longman.
[Google Scholar]
-
Hyland, Ken
2005 Metadiscourse:
Exploring Interaction in
Writing. London: Continuum.
[Google Scholar]
-
Hyland, Ken and Polly Tse
2004 “Metadiscourse
in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal.”
Applied
Linguistics25(2): 156–177.
10.1093/applin/25.2.156
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
[Google Scholar]
-
Hyon, Sunny
1996 “Genre
in three traditions: Implications for ESL.”
TESOL
Quarterly, 30(4): 693–722.
10.2307/3587930
https://doi.org/10.2307/3587930
[Google Scholar]
-
Jopek-Bosiacka, Anna
2012 “Retoryka władzy sądowniczej w orzecznictwie Naczelnego Sądu
Administracyjnego.” [The rhetoric of the judiciary in the judicature of the
Supreme Administrative Court] InMiędzy znaczeniem a działaniem.
Retoryka i władza, ed. byAgnieszka Kampka, 81–108. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo
SGGW.
[Google Scholar]
-
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2009 L’énonciation.
De la subjectivité dans le langage. Paris: Armand
Colin.
[Google Scholar]
-
Le, Cheng and King
Kui Sin
2008 “A
Court Judgment as Dialogue.” Dialogue and
Rhetoric: 267–281.
[Google Scholar]
-
Lichański, Jakub
Zdzisław
2000 Retoryka od
renesansu do współczesności – tradycja i innowacja [Rhetoric from the Renaissance
to the present day – tradition and
innovation]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo
DiG.
[Google Scholar]
-
Loi, Chek
Kim, Moyra
Sweetnam Evans
2010 “Cultural
differences in the organization of research article introductions from the field of educational psychology: English and
Chinese.”
Journal of
Pragmatics42: 2814–2825.
10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.010
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.010
[Google Scholar]
-
Maley, Yon
1985 “Judicial
discourse: the case of legal judgment.” InThe Cultivated
Australian, ed. byJohn
E. Clark, 159–175. Hamburg: Buske.
[Google Scholar]
-
Maley, Yon
1994 “The
Language of the Law.” InLanguage and The
Law, ed. byJohn Gibbons, 11–50. London: Longman.
[Google Scholar]
-
Martin, Jim
R. and David Rose
2003 Working
with Discourse. Meaning beyond the Clause. London, New
York: Continuum.
[Google Scholar]
-
Martin, Jim
R. and David Rose
2008 Genre
Relations: Mapping
Culture. London: Equino.
[Google Scholar]
-
Martin, Jim
R. and David Rose
2012 Learning
to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney
School. Equinox.
[Google Scholar]
-
Martin, Jim
R. and Peter Robert
Rupert White
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910
[Google Scholar]
-
Miczka, Ewa
2002 Kognitywne struktury sytuacyjne i informacyjne w interpretacji dyskursu [Cognitive situational and informational structures in the interpretation of
discourse]. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu
Śląskiego.
[Google Scholar]
-
Muntigl, Peter and Helmut Gruber
https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2005.39.1-2.1
[Google Scholar]
-
Mur
Dueñas, Pilar
2011 “An
intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in
Spanish.”
Journal of
Pragmatics43: 3068–3079.
10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002
[Google Scholar]
-
Mushin, Ilana
2013 “Making
knowledge visible in discourse: Implications for the study of linguistic
evidentiality.”
Discourse
Studies15(5): 627–645.
10.1177/1461445613501447
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501447
[Google Scholar]
-
Nuyts, Jan
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.015
[Google Scholar]
-
Palmer, Frank
R.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178
[Google Scholar]
-
Perelman, Chaim
1984 Justice,
Law and Argumentation. Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning. Dodrecht/ Boston/
London: Springer.
[Google Scholar]
-
Puzynina, Janina
1992 Język wartości [The language of
values]. Warszawa.
[Google Scholar]
-
Sidnell, Jack
https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646686
[Google Scholar]
-
Siepmann, Dirk
2007 “Les
marqueurs de discours polylexicaux en français scientifique.”
Revue française de linguistique
appliquéeXII(2): 123–136.
10.3917/rfla.122.0123
https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.122.0123
[Google Scholar]
-
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie and Karin Aijmer
2007 The
Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A Corpus-based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin/New
York: Mouton de Gruyter.
10.1515/9783110198928
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198928
[Google Scholar]
-
Swales, John
1990 Genre
Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Van
Dijk, Teun
Adrianus
1988 News as
Discourse. Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
[Google Scholar]
-
Weigand, Edda
1999 “Rhetoric
and argumentation in a dialogic perspective.” In
Rhetoric and
Argumentation, ed. by
Eddo Rigotti in collaboration with Sara Cigada, 53–69. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
10.1515/9783110938814‑005
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110938814-005
[Google Scholar]
-
Weigand, Edda
2005 “Conflict
Resolution in Court. Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction.” Special issue of Studies in
Communication Sciences, 193–202.
[Google Scholar]
-
Weigand, Edda
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9000-4
[Google Scholar]
-
Weigand, Edda
2008 “Towards
a Common European Legal Thinking: A dialogic challenge.” InParadoxes
of European Legal Integration, ed. byHanne Petersen, Anne
Lise Kjær, Mikael
Rask Madsen and Helle Krunke. Aldershot: Ashgate.
[Google Scholar]
-
Weigand, Edda
2009 “Language
as Dialogue.” In
Dialogue
Studiesvol.
5, ed. by
Sebastian Feller. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John
Benjamins.
10.1075/ds.5
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5
[Google Scholar]
-
Weigand, Edda
2010 Dialogue:
The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John
Benjamins.
10.1075/ds.10
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10
[Google Scholar]
-
Weigand, Edda
2017 “IADA
history: The unity of dialogue and its multiple faces.”
Language and
Dialogue7(1): 63–79.
10.1075/ld.7.1.05wei
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.1.05wei
[Google Scholar]
-
White, Peter
R. R.
2000 “Dialogue and
inter-subjectivity: reinterpreting the semantics of modality and
hedging.” In
Working with Dialog, ed.
by
Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill and Frances Rock, 67–80. Tübingen: Max
Niemeyer Verlag.
10.1515/9783110941265‑006
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110941265-006
[Google Scholar]
-
White, Peter
R. R.
2003 “Beyond modality and hedging:
A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective
stance.” Text23(2): 2594–2598.
[Google Scholar]
-
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00096.dol