1887
Volume 11, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The current study aims to examine the realization of the speech act of advising among Egyptian university teachers. To this end, 50 Egyptian university teachers at a private university completed eight role-plays in which they gave solicited advice to their fellow teachers. The role-plays were recorded and later transcribed. The data were coded for the advising strategies as well as the initiators and internal/external modifiers. The results showed the participants’ preference for the use of direct advising. The results also showed a minimal influence for the advisor’s gender and years of teaching experience on the participants’ advising preferences. A major influence, however, was observed for the variable of social dominance as represented in the advisee’s academic rank. The results are interpreted in terms of the Mixed Game Model and earlier studies on the speech act of advising.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00099.dak
2021-08-03
2021-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alcón, Eva and Pilar Safont
    2001 “Occurrence of exhortative speech acts in ELT materials and natural speech data: A focus on request strategies and advice realization strategies.” SELL: Studies in English Language and Linguistics3: 5–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Araújo, Antonia Dilamar
    2012 “Academic genres in university contexts: An investigation of students’ book reviews writing as classroom assignments.” InInternational advances in writing research: Cultures, places, measures, ed. byCharles Bazerman , 319–333. New York: Parlor Press e WAC Clearinghouse. 10.37514/PER‑B.2012.0452.2.18
    https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2012.0452.2.18 [Google Scholar]
  3. Banikalef, Ala’Eddin Abdullah Ahmed
    2019 “The impact of culture and gender on the production of online speech acts among Jordanian Facebook users.” International Journal of Arabic-English studies19(2): 399–414.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1978 “Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena.” InQuestions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, ed. byEsther N. Goody, 56–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 1987Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chentsova-Dutton, Yulia E. and Alexandra Vaughn
    2012 “Let me tell you what to do: Cultural differences in advice-giving.” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology43(5): 687–703. 10.1177/0022022111402343
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111402343 [Google Scholar]
  7. El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam
    2017 “The compliment response strategies of Egyptian Arabic-English bilinguals.” Language and Dialogue7(3): 384–412. 10.1075/ld.7.3.03sal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.3.03sal [Google Scholar]
  8. 2018a “Investigating the apology strategies of Saudi learners of English: Foreign language learning in focus.” Pragmatics and Society9(4): 598–625. 10.1075/ps.16048.eld
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16048.eld [Google Scholar]
  9. 2018b “Saying “Yes” and “No” to requests: Is it the same in Egyptian and Saudi Arabic?” Language and Dialogue8(2): 235–260. 10.1075/ld.00014.eld
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00014.eld [Google Scholar]
  10. 2020 “The art of saying “No” to university students: A pragmatic analysis of the speech act of refusal in teacher-student role-plays.” Journal of Language and Education6(4): 55–75. 10.17323/jle.2020.11271
    https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.11271 [Google Scholar]
  11. El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam
    2021 “#StayHome A pragmatic analysis of COVID-19 health advice in Saudi and Australian tweets.” Language and Dialogue11(2): 223–245. 10.1075/ld.00089.dak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00089.dak [Google Scholar]
  12. in press “Compliments and compliment responses in Egyptian and Saudi Arabic: A variational pragmatic comparison.” Pragmatics and Society12(4). 10.1075/ps.18037.eld
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18037.eld [Google Scholar]
  13. El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam, Fatema Ambreen, Maria Zaheer, and Yulia Gusarova
    2019 “A pragmatic analysis of the speech act of criticizing in university teacher-student talk: The case of English as a lingua franca.” Pragmatics29(4): 493–520. 10.1075/prag.18028.eld
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18028.eld [Google Scholar]
  14. Feng, Hairong
    2015 “Understanding cultural variations in giving advice among Americans and Chinese.” Communication Research42(8). 10.1177/0093650213486668
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213486668 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fiske, Alan Page, Shinobu Kitayama, Hazel Rose Markus, and Richard E. Nisbett
    1998 “The cultural matrix of social psychology.” InThe handbook of social psychology, 4th edition, ed. byDaniel Todd Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardener Lindzey, 915–981. San Francisco: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Heritage, John and Sue Sefi
    1992 “Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers.” InTalk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 359–417. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hinkel, Eli
    1997 “Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple-choice data.” Applied Linguistics18(1): 1–26. 10.1093/applin/18.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hofstede, Geert
    2001Culture’s consequence: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hosni, Hala Rashed
    2020 “Advice giving in Egyptian Arabic and American English: A cross-linguistic, cross-cultural study. Journal of Pragmatics155: 193–212. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hyland, Fiona and Ken Hyland
    2001 “Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback.” Journal of Second Language Writing10: 185–212. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(01)00038‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8 [Google Scholar]
  21. Limberg, Holger
    2016 Teaching how to apologize: EFL textbooks and pragmatic input.” Language Teaching Research20(6): 700–718. 10.1177/1362168815590695
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815590695 [Google Scholar]
  22. Martínez-Flor, Alicia
    2003 Non-native speakers’ production of advice acts: The effects of proficiency.” RESLA16: 139–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mascuñana, Evelyn F., Myla June T. Patron, Warlito S. Catuary, and Hermiesela B. Duran
    2019 Compliment responses by college male and female Filipino second language learners of English.” Corpus Pragmatics3: 67–91. 10.1007/s41701‑018‑00048‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-018-00048-3 [Google Scholar]
  24. Moafian, Fatemeh, Naji Yazdi, and Abdullah Sarani
    2019 “The refusal of request speech act in Persian, English, and Balouchi languages: A cross-cultural and cross-linguistic study.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (published online ahead of print). doi:  10.1515/iral‑2018‑0357
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0357 [Google Scholar]
  25. Morkus, Nader
    2014 “Refusals in Egyptian Arabic and American English.” Journal of Pragmatics, 70: 86–107. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Morsi, Rehab
    2010 The speech act of thanking in Egyptian Arabic. Unpublished Master’s thesis atBall State University, USA. Retrieved fromhttps://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/123456789/193733
  27. Mughazy, Mustafa A.
    2000 “Pragmatics of the evil eye in Egyptian Arabic.” Studies in the Linguistics Sciences30(2), 147–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nkwain, Joseph
    2011 “Complimenting and face: A pragma-stylistic analysis of appraisal speech acts in Cameroon Pidgin English. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia43(1): 60–79. 10.1080/03740463.2011.589992
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2011.589992 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pounds, Gabrina
    2018 “Patient-centred communication in ask-the-expert healthcare websites. Applied Linguistics39(2): 117–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rieger, Caroline L.
    2017 “I want a real apology” A discursive pragmatics perspective on apologies.” Pragmatics27(4): 553–590. 10.1075/prag.27.4.04rie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.4.04rie [Google Scholar]
  31. Runblad, Gabriella and Huijun Chen
    2015 “Advice-giving in newspaper weather commentaries.” Journal of Pragmatics89: 14–30. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  32. Shaw, Chloe and Alexa Hepburn
    2013 “Managing moral implications of advice in informal interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction46(4): 344–362. 10.1080/08351813.2013.839095
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.839095 [Google Scholar]
  33. Shishavan, Homa Babai and Farzad Sharifian
    2016 “The refusal speech act in a cross-cultural perspective: A study of Iranian English-language learners and Anglo-American speakers.” Language and Communication47: 75–88. 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Tannen, Deborah
    1986That’s not what I meant. New York: Ballantine Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 1990You just don’t understand. New York: Ballantine Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1994Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Trosborg, Anna
    1995Interlanguage pragmatics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter and Co. 10.1515/9783110885286
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsui, Amy
    1994English conversations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. van Poppel, Lotte
    2019 “Anticipating resistance to health advice: A speech act perspective.” Discourse Processes56(3), 256–269. 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1470440
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1470440 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wardhaugh, Ronald
    1985How conversation works. Cambridge MA: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Weigand, Edda
    2009Language as dialogue. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2010a “Language as dialogue.” Intercultural Pragmatics7(3): 505–515. 10.1515/iprg.2010.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.022 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2010bDialogue. The mixed game. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2015 “Dialogue in the stream of life.” Language and Dialogue5(2): 197–223. 10.1075/ld.5.2.01wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.2.01wei [Google Scholar]
  45. 2017 “The mixed game model: A holistic theory.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 347–366. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wilson, Steven R. and Adrianne W. Kunkel
    2000 “Identity implications of influence goals: similarities in perceived face threats and facework across sex and close relationships.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 195–221. 10.1177/0261927X00019002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X00019002002 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wong, Harry and Rosemary Wong
    2009The first days of school: How to be an effective teacher. Mountain View: Wong Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00099.dak
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00099.dak
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): advising; mixed game model; pragmatics; speech act; university teachers
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error