1887
image of Communicating communication
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Recent years saw the rise of communication experts, operating in various contexts and enjoying high levels of popularity. The paper examines this expertise asking: What kind of expertise do communication experts hold? What is the communication they are expert in? And what can scholars of communication learn from experts who practice it professionally? Based on in-depth interviews with communication experts, we analyze what they believe are the components of their expertise and the reliance of this expertise on communication to communicate itself. We examine this recursive nature of expertise in communication by highlighting the relationship between these experts and laypeople, offering an explanation for the popularity of the former specifically in the era of “the death of expertise”.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00101.fia
2021-09-07
2021-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agrawal, Arun
    1995 “Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge: Some Critical Comments”. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor3 (3): 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, John Langshaw
    1962How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beck, Ulrich and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim
    2018The Normal Chaos of Love. Frankfurt am Main: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton
    2007Habits of the Heart, With a New Preface: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Besley, John C. and Andrea H. Tanner
    2011 “What Science Communication Scholars Think About Training Scientists to Communicate”. Science Communication33 (2): 239–263. 10.1177/1075547010386972
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010386972 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blackman, Lisa
    2004 “Self-help, Media Cultures and the Production of Female Psychopathology”. European Journal of Cultural Studies7 (2): 219–236. 10.1177/1367549404042496
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549404042496 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brownell, Sara E., Jordan V. Price, and Lawrence Steinman
    2013 “Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training”. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education12 (1): E6–E10.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bubela, Tania, Matthew C. Nisbet, Rick Borchelt, Fern Brunger, Cristine Critchley, Edna Einsiedel, Gail Geller
    2009 “Science Communication Reconsidered”. Nature Biotechnology27 (6): 514–518. 10.1038/nbt0609‑514
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0609-514 [Google Scholar]
  9. Burgman, Mark, Anna Carr, Lee Godden, Robin Gregory, Marissa McBride, Louisa Flander, and Lynn Maguire
    2011 “Redefining Expertise and Improving Ecological Judgment”. Conservation Letters4 (2): 81–87. 10.1111/j.1755‑263X.2011.00165.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00165.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Cameron, Deborah
    2000Good to Talk?: Living and Working in a Communication Culture. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Carbaugh, Donal A.
    1988Talking American: Cultural Discourses on Donahue. New York: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carbaugh, Donal
    2013 “On Dialogue Studies”. Journal of Dialogue Studies1 (1): 9–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Carr, E. Summerson
    2010 “Enactments of Expertise”. Annual Review of Anthropology39: 17–32. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104948
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104948 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang, Briankle G.
    1996Deconstructing Communication: Representation, Subject, and Economies of Exchange. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chi, Michelene T. H.
    2006 “Two Approaches to the Study of Experts’ Characteristics”. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, ed. byK. Anders Ericsson, Robert R. Hoffman, Aaron Kozbelt, and A. Mark Williams, 21–30. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816796.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.002 [Google Scholar]
  16. Collins, Harry M., and Robert Evans
    2007Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226113623.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226113623.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Crawford, Mary
    2004 “Mars and Venus Collide: A Discursive Analysis of Marital Self-Help Psychology”. Feminism & Psychology14 (1): 63–79. 10.1177/0959353504040305
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353504040305 [Google Scholar]
  18. Epstein, Steven
    1995 “The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials”. Science, Technology, & Human Values20 (4): 408–437. 10.1177/016224399502000402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399502000402 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ericsson, K. Anders
    2006 “The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance”. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, ed. byK. Anders Ericsson, Robert R. Hoffman, Aaron Kozbelt, and A. Mark Williams, 683–703. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816796.038
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.038 [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Anders Ericsson, Ralf T. Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-Römer
    1993 “The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance”. Psychological Review100 (3): 363. 10.1037/0033‑295X.100.3.363
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ericsson, K. Anders and Neil Charness
    1994 “Expert Performance: Its Structure and Acquisition”. American Psychologist49 (8): 725. 10.1037/0003‑066X.49.8.725
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.725 [Google Scholar]
  22. Evans, Robert
    2008 “The Sociology of Expertise: the Distribution of Social Fluency”. Sociology Compass2 (1): 281–298. 10.1111/j.1751‑9020.2007.00062.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00062.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Evetts, Julia, Harald A. Mieg, and Ulrike Felt
    2006 “Professionalization, Scientific Expertise, and Elitism: A Sociological Perspective”. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, ed. byEricsson, K. Anders, Robert R. Hoffman, Aaron Kozbelt, and A. Mark Williams, 105–123. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816796.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.007 [Google Scholar]
  24. Funtowicz, Silvio O. and Jerome R. Ravetz
    1993 “Science for the Post-Normal Age”. Futures25 (7): 739–755. 10.1016/0016‑3287(93)90022‑L
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L [Google Scholar]
  25. Giddens, Anthony
    1991Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. California: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1992The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gladwell, Malcolm
    2008Outliers: The Story of Success. New York: Little, Brown.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Glaser, Robert and Michelene T. Chi
    2014 “Overview”. InThe Nature of Expertise, ed. byMichelene T. Chi, Robert Glaser, and Marshall J. Farr, xv-xxviii. Hove: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Goffman, Ervin
    1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Greenwood, Royston, Stan X. Li, Rajshree Prakash, and David L. Deephouse
    2005 “Reputation, Diversification, and Organizational Explanations of Performance in Professional Service Firms”. Organization Science16 (6): 661–673. 10.1287/orsc.1050.0159
    https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0159 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hartelius, E. Johanna
    2010 “Wikipedia and the Emergence of Dialogic Expertise”. Southern Communication Journal75 (5): 505–526. 10.1080/10417940903377169
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940903377169 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hymes, Dell
    1972 “On Communicative Competence”. InSociolinguistics: Selected Readingsed. byJ. B. Pride and Janet Holmes, 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Illouz, Eva
    2003Oprah Winfrey and the Glamour of Misery: An Essay on Popular Culture. New York: Columbia University Press. 10.7312/illo11812
    https://doi.org/10.7312/illo11812 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2007Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. London: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2008Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520941311
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520941311 [Google Scholar]
  36. John, Nicholas A.
    2017The Age of Sharing. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kaneh-Shalit, Tamar
    2017 “‘The Goal Is Not to Cheer You Up’: Empathetic Care in Israeli Life Coaching”. Ethos45 (1): 98–115. 10.1111/etho.12155
    https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12155 [Google Scholar]
  38. Katriel, Tamar
    1990 “‘Griping’ as a Verbal Ritual in Some Israeli Discourse”. InCultural Communication and Intercultural Contact, ed. byDonal A. Carbaugh, 99–114. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2004Dialogic Moments: From Soul Talks to Talk Radio in Israeli Culture. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2016 “The Metapragmatics of Direct Utterances”. InInterdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. byAlessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 745–766. Chan: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑12616‑6_29
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_29 [Google Scholar]
  41. Katriel, Tamar and Gerry Philipsen
    1981 ““What We Need is Communication”: ‘Communication’ as a Cultural Category in Some American Speech”. Communication Monographs48 (4): 301–317. 10.1080/03637758109376064
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758109376064 [Google Scholar]
  42. Krippendorff, Klaus
    1994 “A Recursive Theory of Communication”. Communication Theory Today, ed. byDavid Crowley and David Mitchell, 78–104. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lewis, Tania
    2008Smart Living: Lifestyle Media and Popular Expertise. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Nichols, Tom
    2017The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and why It Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Perera, Ajith H., C. Ashton Drew, and Chris J. Johnson
    2012 “Experts, Expert Knowledge, and Their Roles in Landscape Ecological Applications”. InExpert Knowledge and Its Application in Landscape Ecology, ed. byAjith H. Perera, C. Ashton Drew and Chris J. Johnson, 1–10. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑1034‑8_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1034-8_1 [Google Scholar]
  46. Peters, John D.
    1999Speaking Into the Air: The History of the Idea of Communication. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pfister, Damien Smith
    2011 “Networked Expertise in the Era of Many-To-Many Communication: On Wikipedia and Invention”. Social Epistemology25 (3): 217–231. 10.1080/02691728.2011.578306
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.578306 [Google Scholar]
  48. Pinchevski, Amit
    2005By Way of Interruption: Levinas and the Ethics of Communication. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Radford, Tim
    2011 “Of Course Scientists Can Communicate”. Nature News469 (7331), 445–445. 10.1038/469445a
    https://doi.org/10.1038/469445a [Google Scholar]
  50. Sarangi, Srikant
    2001 “Editorial: On Demarcating the Space Between ‘Lay Expertise’ and ‘Expert Laity’. Text. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse21 (1–2): 3–11. 10.1515/text.1.21.1‑2.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.21.1-2.3 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schön, Donald A.
    1983The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Book Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sorial, Sarah
    2017 “The Legitimacy of Pseudo-Expert Discourse in the Public Sphere”. Metaphilosophy48 (3): 304–324. 10.1111/meta.12233
    https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12233 [Google Scholar]
  53. Stern, Paul C. and Fineberg, Harvey V.
    1996Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington: National Academies Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Taylor, Hazel
    2005 “A Critical Decision Interview Approach to Capturing Tacit Knowledge: Principles and Application”. International Journal of Knowledge Management1 (3): 25–39. 10.4018/jkm.2005070102
    https://doi.org/10.4018/jkm.2005070102 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2007 “Eliciting Tacit Knowledge Using the Critical Decision Interview Method“. InKnowledge Management in Modern Organizations, ed. byMurray E. Jennex, 285–301. Hershey, Pa.: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑59904‑261‑9.ch016
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-261-9.ch016 [Google Scholar]
  56. Treem, Jeffrey W.
    2012 “Communicating Expertise: Knowledge Performances in Professional-Service Firms”. Communication Monographs79 (1): 23–47. 10.1080/03637751.2011.646487
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2011.646487 [Google Scholar]
  57. Walton, Douglas
    1997Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Weigand, Edda
    2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2017 “IADA History. The Unity of Dialogue and its Multiple Faces”. Language and Dialogue7(1): 63–79. 10.1075/ld.7.1.05wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.1.05wei [Google Scholar]
  60. Woodstock, Margaret L.
    2002 Cure without Communication: Self-help Books and Popular Notions of Self and Communication, 1860–2000 [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Pennsylvania.
  61. Wortham, Stanton, Katherine Mortimer, Kathy Lee, Elaine Allard, and Kimberly Daniel White
    2011 “Interviews as Interactional Data”. Language in Society40 (1): 39–50. 10.1017/S0047404510000874
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000874 [Google Scholar]
  62. Wynne, Brian
    1996 “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide”. InRisk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, ed. byScott Lash, Bronislaw Szerszynski and Brian Wynne, 44–83. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Zeitz, Colleen M.
    1997 “Some Concrete Advantages of Abstraction: How Experts’ Representations Facilitate Reasoning”. InExpertise in Context: Human and Machine, ed. byPaul J. Feltovich, Kenneth M. Ford and Robert R. Hoffman, 43–65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00101.fia
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error