1887
Volume 11, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Understanding Dialogue. Language Use and Social Interaction

 
978-1-108-47361-3,

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00105.saf
2021-09-07
2021-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bell, Allan
    1984 “Language style as audience design.” Language in Society13(2): 145–204. 10.1017/S004740450001037X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
  2. Bratman, Michael E.
    1992 “Shared cooperative activity.” Philosophical Review101(2): 327–341. 10.2307/2185537
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2185537 [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark, Herbert H. and Gregory L. Murphy
    1982 “Audience design in meaning and reference.” Advances in Psychology9: 287–299. 10.1016/S0166‑4115(09)60059‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60059-5 [Google Scholar]
  4. Gardner, Howard
    1983Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Iacoboni, Marco
    2009 “Imitation, Empathy, and Mirror Neurons”. Annual Review of Psychology60: 653–670. 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604 [Google Scholar]
  7. Kecskes, Istvan
    2010 “The Paradox of Communication: A Socio-Cognitive Approach.” Pragmatics and Society1(1): 50–73. 10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec [Google Scholar]
  8. 2017 “From Pragmatics to Dialogue.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 78–92. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1979 “Activity types and language.” Linguistics17(5–6): 365–399. 10.1515/ling.1979.17.5‑6.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.5-6.365 [Google Scholar]
  10. Peirce, Charles S.
    1940The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings. ed. byJustus Buchler. New York: Harcourt.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Săftoiu, Răzvan
    2012 “An exercise in the theory of conversational resources.” Language and Dialogue2(2): 244–261. 10.1075/ld.2.2.04saf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.2.2.04saf [Google Scholar]
  12. Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rossano, Jan Peter de Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon, and Stephen C. Levinson
    2009 “Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106: 10587–10592. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106 [Google Scholar]
  13. Weigand, Edda
    2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  14. (ed.) 2017The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. New York and London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1953Philosophical Investigations. Macmillan Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00105.saf
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error