Dialogue and speech centricity in the public sphere

References

1. Austin, John Langshaw
   1962 How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
   Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990)
3. Barber, Benjamin R.
   1984 Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakhtin, M. Mikhail
   1984 Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Poetics. Ed. byMichael Holquist, translated byCaryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
   https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 [Google Scholar]
5. Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
   1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Translated byVern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Benson, Rodney
   2013 Shaping Immigration News: A French-American Comparison. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139034326
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139034326 [Google Scholar]
7. Buckley v. Valeo
   Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S.1 (1976) 10.1086/scr.1976.3108757
   https://doi.org/10.1086/scr.1976.3108757
8. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
   Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S.310 (2010).
9. Clark, Eve V. and Josie Bernicot
   2008 “Repetition as Ratification. How Parents and Children Place Information in Common Ground.” Journal of Child Language35(2): 349–371. 10.1017/S0305000907008537
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008537 [Google Scholar]
10. Corradi Fiumara, Gemma
    1995 The Other Side of Language: A Philosophy of Listening. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Crick, Bernard
    1992 In Defense of Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Crick, Bernard
    2002 Democracy: A Very Short Introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Douglass, Frederick
    1860 (December14). “Frederick Douglass at Music Hall.” The Liberator30: 50.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Federal Communications Commission
    Federal Communications Commission 1949 “In the Matter of Editorializing by Broadcast Licensees. Report of the Commission.” No.8516.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gregorian, Vartan
    2002 (October17). “Libraries as Acts of Civic Renewal.” Speech to the Kansas City Club, Kansas City, Missouri. https://www.kclibrary.org/signature-events/evening-vartan-gregorian
16. Guo, Lei and Maxwell E. McCombs
    (eds.) 2016 The Power of Information Networks: New Directions for Agenda Setting. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Humboldt, Wilhelm von
    1963 Humanist Without Portfolio: An Anthology of the Writings of Wilhelm von Humboldt. Trans. byMarianne Cowan. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jakubinskij, Lev P.
    1979 “On Verbal Dialogue.“ Trans.Jane E. Knox. Dispositio. Revista Hispanica de Semiotica LiterariaIV (11–12): 321–336.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jaworski, Adam and Crispin Thurlow
    2009 “Taking an Elitist Stance.” InStance. Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. byAlexandra M. Jaffe, 195–226. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
20. Kleindienst v. Mandel
    Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S.753 (1972).
21. Kim, Son Ho
    2011 The Voice on Paper: A Dialogic Critique of Public Opinion Polling. Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania. https://www.proquest.com/docview/923280809/abstract/AC01B42ACF394644PQ/1
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lacey, Kate
    2013 Listening Publics: The Politics and Experience of Listening in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lamont v. Postmaster General
    Lamont v. Postmaster General, 381 U.S.301 (1965).
24. Lim, Sun Sun
    2020 “Manufacturing Hate 4.0. Can Media Studies Rise to the Challenge?” Television and New Media21(6): 602–607. 10.1177/1527476420918825
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420918825 [Google Scholar]
25. Lipari, Lisbeth
    1999 “Polling as Ritual.” Journal of Communication49(1): 83. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1999.tb02783.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02783.x [Google Scholar]
26. Lipari, Lisbeth
    2000 “Toward a Discourse Approach to Polling.” Discourse Studies2(2): 187–215. 10.1177/1461445600002002003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002003 [Google Scholar]
27. Lipari, Lisbeth
    2014a Listening, Thinking, Being. Toward an Ethics of Attunement. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lipari, Lisbeth
    2014b “On Interlistening and the Idea of Dialogue.” Theory and Psychology24(4): 504–523. 10.1177/0959354314540765
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314540765 [Google Scholar]
29. Lipari, Lisbeth
    2017 “The Speech We Do Not Speak. Dialogic Mind, Praxis, and Ethics.” Language and Dialogue7(1): 45–62. 10.1075/ld.7.1.04lip
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.1.04lip [Google Scholar]
30. Matzko, Paul
    2020 The Radio Right. How a Band of Broadcasters Took on the Federal Government and Built the Modern Conservative Movement. Kettering: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190073220.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190073220.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
31. McGee, Michael Calvin
    1980 “The ‘Ideograph’. A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology.” Quarterly Journal of Speech66(1): 1–16. 10.1080/00335638009383499
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383499 [Google Scholar]
32. Mill, John Stuart
    2001 On Liberty. Electronic resource. London: Electric Book Co.
    [Google Scholar]
33. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964) 10.1056/NEJM196402132700731
    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196402132700731
34. New York Times Co. v. United States
    New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S.713 (1971).
35. Norrick, Neal R.
    2009 “Ratifying and Rejecting Listener Assessments in the Course of Multi-Unit Turns.” Saarland Working Papers in Linguistics (SWPL) (3): 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Nystrand, Martin, Wu, Lawrence L., Gamoran, Adam, Zeiser, Susie and David A. Long
    2003 “Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse.” Discourse Processes35(2): 135–198. 10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3 [Google Scholar]
37. Peters, John Durham
    2005 Courting the Abyss: Free Speech and Liberal Tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226662756.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226662756.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
38. Potter, Nancy
    2000 “Giving Uptake.” Social Theory and Practice26(3): 479–508. 10.5840/soctheorpract200026315
    https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200026315 [Google Scholar]
39. Radio Act, Pub. L
    Radio Act, Pub. L 1927 No. 47 U.S.C. 4.
40. Red Lion Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. FCC
    Red Lion Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. FCC, 395 U.S.367 (1969).
41. Ryfe, David Michael
    2007 “The Future of Media Politics.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs10(4): 723–738. 10.1353/rap.2008.0034
    https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2008.0034 [Google Scholar]
42. Sandel, Michael
    2020 The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good?New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sbisà, Marina
    2007 “How to Read Austin.” Pragmatics17(3): 461–473. 10.1075/prag.17.3.06sbi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.3.06sbi [Google Scholar]
44. Schudson, Michael
    1997 “Why Conversation Is Not the Soul of Democracy.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication14(4): 297–309. 10.1080/15295039709367020
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039709367020 [Google Scholar]
45. Thomas v. Collins
    Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S.516 (1945).
46. Volosinov, Valentin Nikolaevich
    1986 Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. byLadislav Matejka and Irwin R. Titunik. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich
    1986 Thought and Language. Trans. byAlex Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Weigand, Edda and Istvan Kecskes
    (eds) 2018 From Pragmatics to Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.31
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31 [Google Scholar]