1887
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Following Bakhtin (e.g., [1999] 1984, 184), dialogue studies have assumed at least some form of parity between dialogic participants. But what happens when parity is significantly disrupted or lost entirely? In this report of cultural practice among the Hobongan living on the island of Borneo, I examine the results of lost parity on traditional Hobongan and Christian-influenced cultural practices. The Hobongan typically acknowledge the lack of parity and ignore it, or they accept the lack of parity and try to rejoin polyphony through conversion. Syncretism presents a more complex case because dialogue remains possible: both Hobongan and Christian-influenced practices are combined to avoid unpleasant dialogues.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00116.per
2022-03-07
2022-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Babcock, Tim G.
    1974 “Indigenous Ethnicity in Sarawak.” Sarawak Museum Journal22: 191–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    1999 [1984]Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, edited and translated byCaryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barkham, Patrick
    2008 (9November). “The Power of Speech”. The Guardian. https://theguardian.com/world/2008/nov/10/daniel-everett-amazon
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Conley, William W.
    1974 “Kenyah Receptivity and Response to Christianity.” Sarawak Museum Journal22(43): 311–321.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Czaykowska-Higgins, Eva
    2009 “Research Models, Community Engagement, and Linguistic Fieldwork: Reflections on Working with Canadian Indigenous Communities.” Language Documentation and Conservation3(1): 15–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.
    2001 “Places and Peoples: Field Sites and Informants.” InLinguistic Fieldwork, ed. byPaul Newman and Martha Ratliff, 55–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511810206.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810206.004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerdts, Donna B.
    2017 “Indigenous Linguists: Bringing Research into Language Revitalization.” International Journal of American Linguistics83(4): 607–617. 10.1086/693763
    https://doi.org/10.1086/693763 [Google Scholar]
  8. Leonard, Wesley Y.
    2017 “Producing Language Reclamation by Decolonising ‘Language’”. InLanguage Documentation and Description, vol.14, ed. ByWesley Y. Leonard and Haley de Korne, 15–36. London: EL Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. McGivney, Annette
    2021 (3July). “The Battle for Mount Rushmore: ‘It Should be Turned into Something Like the Holocaust Museum.’” The Guardian. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jul/03/mount-rushmore-south-dakota-indigenous-americans
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Niditch, Susan
    1996Oral World and Written Word: Ancient Israelite Literature. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ong, Walter J.
    2007 [2002]Orality and Literacy. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Pascual, Esther
    2014Fictive Interaction: The Conversation Frame in Thought, Language, and Discourse. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.47
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.47 [Google Scholar]
  13. Riederer, Rachel
    2019 “An Uncommon Victory for an Indigenous Tribe in the Amazon.” The New Yorker, 15May. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/an-uncommon-victory-for-an-indigenous-tribe-in-the-amazon
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Villa, Daniel J.
    2002 “Integrating Technology into Minority Language Preservation and Teaching Efforts: An Inside job.” Language Learning and Technology6(2): 92–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Weigand, Edda
    2010 “Language as Dialogue”. Intercultural Pragmatics7(3): 505–515. 10.1515/iprg.2010.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.022 [Google Scholar]
  16. Whittier, Herbert L. and Patricia R. Whittier
    1974 “The Apo Kayan area of East Kalimantan.” Sarawak Museum Journal22: 5–15.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00116.per
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Austronesian; Bakhtin; dialogue; Hobongan; Hovongan
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error