Governmentality-in-action

References

1. Alvesson, Mats and Hugh Willmott
   2002 “Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual”. Journal of Management Studies39(5): 619–644. 10.1111/1467‑6486.00305
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00305 [Google Scholar]
2. Benwell, Bethan and Elizabeth Stokoe
   2010 “Analysing Identity in Interaction: Contrasting Discourse, Genealogical, Narrative and Conversation Analysis”. InThe Sage Handbook of Identities, ed. byMargaret Wetherell and Chandra Talpade Mohanty, 82–101. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446200889.n6
   https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200889.n6 [Google Scholar]
3. Binkley, Sam
   2011 “Happiness, Positive Psychology and the Program of Neoliberal Governmentality”. Subjectivity4(4): 371–394. 10.1057/sub.2011.16
   https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2011.16 [Google Scholar]
4. Binkley, Sam
   2014 Happiness as Enterprise: An Essay on Neoliberal Life. New York: Suny Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bondi, Liz
   2005 “Working the Spaces of Neoliberal Subjectivity: Psychotherapeutic Technologies, Professionalisation and Counselling”. Antipode37(3): 497–514. 10.1111/j.0066‑4812.2005.00508.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00508.x [Google Scholar]
6. Bouton, Katie
   (2015, July17). “Recruiting for Cultural Fit”. Harvard Business Review (online). https://hbr.org/2015/07/recruiting-for-cultural-fit
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brownlie, Julie
   2004 “Tasting the Witches’ Brew: Foucault and Therapeutic Practices”. Sociology38(3): 515–532. 10.1177/0038038504043216
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038504043216 [Google Scholar]
8. Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall
   2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach”. Discourse Studies7(4–5): 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
9. Cabanas, Edgar, and Eva Illouz
   2019 Manufacturing Happy Citizens: How the Science and Industry of Happiness Control our Lives. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cameron, Kim and Robert Quinn
    1999 Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on The Competing Values Framework. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Clifton, Jonathan, Dorien Van De Mieroop, and Prachee Sehgal
    2018 “The Multimodal Enactment of Deontic and Epistemic Authority in Indian Meetings”. Pragmatics28(3): 333–360. 10.1075/prag.17011.cli
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17011.cli [Google Scholar]
12. Drew, Paul
    1991 “Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions”. InAsymmetries in Dialogue, ed. byIvanna Markovà and Klaus Foppa, 29–48. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Du Gay, Paul
    1996 Consumption and Identity at Work. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446221945
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221945 [Google Scholar]
14. Edley, Nigel
    2001 “Analysing Masculinity: Interpretative Repertoires, Ideological Dilemmas and Subject Positions.” InDiscourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, ed. byMargaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon Yates, 189–228. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Edley, Nigel and Margaret Wetherell
    1997 “Jockeying for Position: The Construction of Masculine Identities.” Discourse & Society8(2): 203–217. 10.1177/0957926597008002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008002004 [Google Scholar]
16. Fogde, Marinette
    2011 “Governing through career coaching: negotiations of self-marketing.” Organization18(1): 65–82. 10.1177/1350508410375644
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410375644 [Google Scholar]
17. Foucault, Michel
    1977 Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London. Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Foucault, Michel
    1978 “Politics and the Study of Discourse”. Ideology and Consciousness3: 7–26.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Foucault, Michel
    1988 “Technologies of the Self” inTechnologies of the Self, ed. byLuther H. Martin, Huck Gutman, and Patrick H. Hutton, 16–49. London: Tavistock.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Foucault, Michel
    1991 “Governmentality”. InThe Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. byGraham Burchell, ‎Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 87–104. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Foucault, Michel
    1997 Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984. Vol.1. New York: New Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gee, James Paul
    1999 An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gee, James Paul
    2015 “Discourse, Small d, Big D.” InThe International Encyclopaedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. byKaren Tracey1–5. New York: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi016
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi016 [Google Scholar]
25. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hacking, Ian
    2004 “Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: between Discourse in the Abstract and Face-to-Face Interaction”. Economy and Society33(3): 277–302. 10.1080/0308514042000225671
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225671 [Google Scholar]
27. Heritage, John
    2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge”. Research on Language & Social Interaction45(1): 30–52. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
28. Heritage, John and Rodney Watson
    1979 “Formulations as Conversational Objects”. InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. byGeorge Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hodges, Ian
    2002 “Moving Beyond Words: Therapeutic Discourse and Ethical Problematization.” Discourse Studies4(4): 455–479. 10.1177/14614456020040040401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040040401 [Google Scholar]
30. Landmark, Anne Marie Dalby, Pål Gulbrandsen, and Jan Svennevig
    2015 “Whose decision? Negotiating epistemic and deontic rights in medical treatment decisions.” Journal of Pragmatics78: 54–69. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.007 [Google Scholar]
31. Layard, Richard
    2005 Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Levinson, Stephen
    1992 “Activity Types and Language”. InTalk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Martinussen, Maree and Margaret Wetherell
    2019 “Affect, Practice and Contingency: Critical Discursive Psychology and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick”. Subjectivity12(2): 101–116. 10.1057/s41286‑019‑00071‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-019-00071-y [Google Scholar]
34. Miller, Gale and Kathryn Fox
    2004 “Building Bridges. The Possibility of Analytic Dialogue Between Ethnography, Conversation Analysis and Foucault”. InQualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice, ed. byDavid Silverman35–55. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984a “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shaped”. InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984b “Giving a source or basis: The practice in conversation of telling ‘how I know’.” Journal of Pragmatics8(5–6): 607–625. 10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90002‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90002-X [Google Scholar]
37. Potter, Jonathan and Margaret Wetherell
    1987 Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Raffnsøe, Sverre, Andrea Mennicken, and Peter Miller
    2019 “The Foucault Effect in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies40(2): 155–182. 10.1177/0170840617745110
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617745110 [Google Scholar]
39. Rampton, Ben
    2014 “Gumperz and Governmentality in the 21st Century: Interaction, Power and Subjectivity.” Tilburg Papers in Cultural Studies. Available at: https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/sites/default/files/download/TPCS_117_Rampton2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
40. Raymond, Geoffrey
    2000 “The Voice of Authority: The Local Accomplishment of Authoritative Discourse in Live News Broadcasts.” Discourse Studies2(3): 354–379. 10.1177/1461445600002003005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002003005 [Google Scholar]
41. Reynolds, Jill and Margaret Wetherell
    2003 “The Discursive Climate of Singleness: The Consequences for Women’s Negotiation of a Single Identity.” Feminism & Psychology13(4): 489–510. 10.1177/09593535030134014
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535030134014 [Google Scholar]
42. Rose, Nikolas
    1990 Governing the Soul. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Rose, Nikolas
    1998 Inventing Ourselves. Psychology, Power and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rose, Nikolas, Pat O’Malley, and Mariana Valverde
    2006 “Governmentality”. Annual Review of Law and Social Science2(1): 83–104. 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900 [Google Scholar]
45. Schegloff, Emanuel
    1997 “Whose text? Whose context?” Discourse & Society8(2): 165–187. 10.1177/0957926597008002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008002002 [Google Scholar]
46. Seligman, Martin
    2011 Flourish: A New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being – and How to Achieve them. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Stevanovic, Melisa and Anssi Peräkylä
    2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language & Social Interaction45(3): 297–321. 10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260 [Google Scholar]
48. Taylor, Stephanie
    2015 “Discursive and Psychosocial? Theorising a Complex Contemporary Subject.” Qualitative Research in Psychology12(1): 8–21. 10.1080/14780887.2014.958340
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.958340 [Google Scholar]
49. Wetherell, Margaret
    1998 “Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-Structuralism in Dialogue.” Discourse & Society9(3): 387–412. 10.1177/0957926598009003005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003005 [Google Scholar]
50. Wetherell, Margaret and Nigel Edley
    2009 “Masculinity Manoeuvres: Critical Discourse Psychology and the Analysis of Identity Strategies”. InThe New Sociolinguistics Reader, ed. byNikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski, 201–214. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑92299‑4_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-92299-4_14 [Google Scholar]
51. Wiggins, Sally and Jonathan Potter
    2017 “Discursive Psychology”. InThe Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, ed. byCarla Willig and Wendy Stainton Rogers, 93–110. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781526405555.n6
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n6 [Google Scholar]