1887
image of In dialogue with non-humans or how women are silenced in incels’ discourse
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Dialogue plays a most important role in interpersonal relations creating and strengthening social cohesion. Conversely, the lack of dialogue – and more tellingly a deliberate resistance to it – leads to social friction and animosity. In this paper I focus on a strategy used to intentionally disable a possibility of a meaningful dialogue and to deny any voice to the “other”. Dehumanising the “other” by linguistically representing them as animals or machines exempts the perpetrator from any obligation towards the “other”, including the obligation to respect their rights. I adopt Haslam’s model of dehumanisation ( ) which shows how, by means of metaphorical language, women are dehumanised and denied the possibility to participate in a meaningful dialogue in the so called manosphere.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00119.pra
2022-03-22
2022-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bastian, Brock and Nick Haslam
    2011 “Experiencing Dehumanization: Cognitive and Emotional Effects of Everyday Dehumanization.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology33 (4): 295–303. 10.1080/01973533.2011.614132
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.614132 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brzuszkiewicz, Sara
    2020 “Incel Radical Milieu and External Locus of Control.” November. https://icct.nl/publication/incel-radical-milieu-and-external-locus-of-control/
  3. Byerly, Carolyn M.
    2020 “Incels Online Reframing Sexual Violence.” The Communication Review23 (4): 290–308. 10.1080/10714421.2020.1829305
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2020.1829305 [Google Scholar]
  4. Costello, Kimberly
    2013 Determinants and Consequences of Dehumanization: An Interspecies Model of Prejudice. PhD thesis available athttps://dr.library.brocku.ca/handle/10464/4180
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Costello, Kimberly and Gordon Hodson
    2014 “Explaining Dehumanization among Children: The Interspecies Model of Prejudice.” The British Journal of Social Psychology53 (1): 175–197. 10.1111/bjso.12016
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12016 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ging, Debbie
    2019 “Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere.” Men and Masculinities22 (4): 638–657. 10.1177/1097184X17706401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gothard, Kelly, David Rushing Dewhurst, Joshua R. Minot, Jane Lydia Adams, Christopher M. Danforth, and Peter Sheridan Dodds
    2021 “The Incel Lexicon: Deciphering the Emergent Cryptolect of a Global Misogynistic Community.” ArXiv:2105.12006 [Cs], May. arxiv.org/abs/2105.12006
  8. Haslam, Nick
    2006 “Dehumanization: An Integrative Review.” Personality and Social Psychology Review10 (3): 252–64. 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 [Google Scholar]
  9. Haslam, Nick, Steve Loughnan, and Pamela Sun
    2011 “Beastly: What Makes Animal Metaphors Offensive?” Journal of Language and Social Psychology30 (3): 311–325. 10.1177/0261927X11407168
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X11407168 [Google Scholar]
  10. Heritage, Frazer and Veronika Koller
    2020 “Incels, in-Groups, and Ideologies: The Representation of Gendered Social Actors in a Sexuality-Based Online Community.” Journal of Language and Sexuality9 (2): 152–178. 10.1075/jls.19014.her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.19014.her [Google Scholar]
  11. Hodson, Gordon, Cara C. MacInnis, and Kimberly Costello
    2014 “(Over)Valuing «Humanness» as an Aggravator of Intergroup Prejudices and Discrimination.” InHumanness and Dehumanization, ed. byPaul G. Bain, Jeroen Vaes, and Jacques-Philippe Leyens, 86–110. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hohenhaus, Peter
    2005 “Lexicalization and Institutionalization.” InHandbook of Word-Formation, ed. byPavol Štekauer and Rochelle Lieber, 64:353–73. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_15
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_15 [Google Scholar]
  13. “Incels: A Guide to Symbols and Terminology.” Moonshot. 26May 2020https://moonshotteam.com/incels-symbols-and-terminology/
  14. Jaki, Sylvia, Tom De Smedt, Maja Gwóźdź, Rudresh Panchal, Alexander Rossa, and Guy De Pauw
    2019 “Online Hatred of Women in the Incels. Me Forum: Linguistic Analysis and Automatic Detection.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict7 (2): 240–68. 10.1075/jlac.00026.jak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00026.jak [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones, Callum, Verity Trott, and Scott Wright
    2020 “Sluts and Soyboys: MGTOW and the Production of Misogynistic Online Harassment.” New Media & Society22 (10): 1903–21. 10.1177/1461444819887141
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819887141 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2002Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2015Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. 1 edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lakoff, George
    1993 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” InMetaphor and Thought (2nd ed.), ed. byAndrew Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. 1st edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Locke, Kenneth D.
    2005 “Connecting the Horizontal Dimension of Social Comparison with Self-Worth and Self-Confidence.” Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin31 (6): 795–803. 10.1177/0146167204271634
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271634 [Google Scholar]
  21. Musolff, Andreas
    2010Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic. 1st edition. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203847282
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847282 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2012 “Immigrants and Parasites: The History of a Bio-Social Metaphor.” Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 249–258. 10.1007/978‑3‑7091‑0950‑2_22
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0950-2_22 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nussbaum, Martha C.
    1995 “Objectification.” Philosophy & Public Affairs24 (4): 249–291. 10.1111/j.1088‑4963.1995.tb00032.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Omotoyinbo, Femi Richard
    2014 ‘Online Radicalisation: The Net or the Netizen?” Socialinės Technologijos01: 51–61. 10.13165/ST‑14‑4‑1‑04
    https://doi.org/10.13165/ST-14-4-1-04 [Google Scholar]
  25. Papadamou, Kostantinos, Savvas Zannettou, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gianluca Stringhini, and Michael Sirivianos
    2021 ‘“How over Is It?” «Understanding the Incel Community on YouTube.» InProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction5 (CSCW2): 1–25. 10.1145/3479556
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3479556 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pereira e Silva, Welton
    2021 “Argumentação em discursos de ódio no Facebook: uma categorização contributiva à Linguística Forense e à Linguística Computacional / Argumentation in hate speech on Facebook: a contributive categorization to Forensic Linguistics and Computational Linguistics.” Revista de Estudos da Linguagem29 (4): 2368–2395.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Perez, Nancy Pilar
    2013 “Roles of Women in Advertising : The Objectification of Women and the Shift to an Empowering Ad Frame.” https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/22407
  28. Prażmo, Ewelina
    2019 “ “Leftie Snowflakes” and Other Metaphtonymies in the British Political Discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics18 (3): 371–392. 10.1075/jlp.17073.pra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17073.pra [Google Scholar]
  29. 2020 “Foids Are Worse than Animals. A Cognitive Linguistics Analysis of Dehumanizing Metaphors in Online Discourse.” Topics in Linguistics21 (2): 16–27. 10.2478/topling‑2020‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2020-0007 [Google Scholar]
  30. Prażmo, Ewelina and Rafał Augustyn
    2020 “Parasites, Herbivores and Dried Fish: Dehumanising Metaphorical Blends in Japanese.” GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies20 (2). 10.17576/gema‑2020‑2002‑09
    https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2002-09 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ribeiro, Manoel Horta, Jeremy Blackburn, Barry Bradlyn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gianluca Stringhini, Summer Long, Stephanie Greenberg, and Savvas Zannettou
    2020 “The Evolution of the Manosphere Across the Web.” ArXiv:2001.07600 [Cs], May. arxiv.org/abs/2001.07600
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Savage, Rowan
    2007 “ “Disease Incarnate”: Biopolitical Discourse and Genocidal Dehumanisation in the Age of Modernity.” Journal of Historical Sociology20 (3): 404–440. 10.1111/j.1467‑6443.2007.00315.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.2007.00315.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Schröder, Ulrike
    2015 “Metaphorical Blends and Their Function in Discourse on Society: A Cross-Cultural Study.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies2 (1): 50–78. 10.1075/cogls.2.1.03sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.2.1.03sch [Google Scholar]
  34. Semino, Elena
    2010 “Unrealistic Scenarios, Metaphorical Blends and Rhetorical Strategies across Genres.” English Text Construction3 (2): 250–274. 10.1075/etc.3.2.07sem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.3.2.07sem [Google Scholar]
  35. Sindoni, Maria Grazia
    2017 ‘“Migrants Are Cockroaches”. Hate Speech in British Tabloids’. Civiltà Del Mediterraneo 28.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Stijelja, Stefan
    2021 “The Psychosocial Profile of Involuntary Celibates (Incels): A Review of Empirical Evidence.” 10.31234/osf.io/9mutg
    https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9mutg [Google Scholar]
  37. Sugiura, Lisa
    2021The Incel Rebellion: The Rise of the Manosphere and the Virtual War Against Women. Emerald Publishing Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Szymanski, Dawn M., Lauren B. Moffitt, and Erika R. Carr
    2011 “Sexual Objectification of Women: Advances to Theory and Research 1ψ7.” The Counseling Psychologist39 (1): 6–38. 10.1177/0011000010378402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378402 [Google Scholar]
  39. Teunis, Niels
    2007 “Sexual Objectification and the Construction of Whiteness in the Gay Male Community.” Culture, Health & Sexuality9 (3): 263–275. 10.1080/13691050601035597
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050601035597 [Google Scholar]
  40. Tipler, Caroline N. and Janet B. Ruscher
    2019 “Dehumanizing Representations of Women: The Shaping of Hostile Sexist Attitudes through Animalistic Metaphors.” Journal of Gender Studies28 (1): 109–118. 10.1080/09589236.2017.1411790
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1411790 [Google Scholar]
  41. Tirrell, Lynne
    2012 “Genocidal Language Games.” InSpeech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech, ed. byIshani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 174–221. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Torok, Robyn
    2013 “Developing an Explanatory Model for the Process of Online Radicalisation and Terrorism.” Security Informatics2 (1): 6. 10.1186/2190‑8532‑2‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-8532-2-6 [Google Scholar]
  43. Townsend, Emma
    2014 “Hate Speech or Genocidal Discourse? An Examination of Anti-Roma Sentiment in Contemporary Europe.” PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies11 (1). 10.5130/portal.v11i1.3287
    https://doi.org/10.5130/portal.v11i1.3287 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tranchese, Alessia and Lisa Sugiura
    2021 ““I Don’t Hate All Women, Just Those Stuck-Up Bitches”: How Incels and Mainstream Pornography Speak the Same Extreme Language of Misogyny.” Violence Against Women27 (14): 2709–2734. 10.1177/1077801221996453
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801221996453 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jorg Schmid
    2006An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics, 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Vance, Kaylee, Megan Sutter, Paul B. Perrin, and Martin Heesacker
    2015 “The Media’s Sexual Objectification of Women, Rape Myth Acceptance, and Interpersonal Violence.” Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma24 (5): 569–587. 10.1080/10926771.2015.1029179
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1029179 [Google Scholar]
  47. Waśniewska, Małgorzata
    2017 “The Socio-Parasite and Bio-Parasite Metaphorical Concepts in Racist Discourse.” Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies17 (2/2017): 46–61. 10.15290/cr.2017.17.2.03
    https://doi.org/10.15290/cr.2017.17.2.03 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2018 “A Dog or a Wolf – The Role of Connotations in Animalistic Metaphors and the Process of Dehumanisation.” New Horizons in English Studies, no.3 (August): 3. 10.17951/nh.2018.3.3
    https://doi.org/10.17951/nh.2018.3.3 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2020 “The Red Pill, Unicorns and White Knights: Cultural Symbolism and Conceptual Metaphor in the Slang of Online Incel Communities.” InCultural Conceptualizations in Language and Communication, ed. byBarbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 65–82. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑42734‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42734-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wills, Deborah
    2009At War with Metaphor: Media, Propaganda, and Racism in the War on Terror. Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Young, Olivia
    2019 “What Role Has Social Media Played in Violence Perpetrated by Incels?” Peace Studies Student Papers and Posters, May. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/peace_studies_student_work/1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00119.pra
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error